Preferences for Energy Efficiency vs. Renewables: What Is the Willingness to Pay to Reduce CO2 Emissions?

Concerns about climate change are growing, and so is the demand for information about the costs and benefits of mitigating greenhouse gas emissions. This paper seeks to estimate the benefits of climate change mitigation, as measured by the public's willingness to pay for such policies. We investigate the preferences of Italian and Czech households towards climate change mitigation policy options directly related to residential energy use. We use discrete choice experiments, which are administered in a standardized fashion to representative samples in the two countries through computer-assisted web interviews. Our preferred estimates of the willingness to pay per ton of CO2 emissions avoided is €133 for the Italians and €94 Euro for the Czech respondents (at 2014 purchasing power parity). We find evidence of considerable heterogeneity in WTP driven by income. The two samples differ in their within-sample income elasticities of WTP, but comparison across the two countries suggests an income elasticity of WTP of one—or even greater than one for certain mixed logit specifications.

[1]  Henrik Lindhjem,et al.  Reliability of Meta-analytic Benefit Transfers of International Value of Statistical Life Estimates: Tests and Illustrations , 2015 .

[2]  Steffen Kallbekken,et al.  The demand for earmarking: Results from a focus group study , 2010 .

[3]  H. L. Miller,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis , 2007 .

[4]  Carol L. Silva,et al.  Testing for Budget Constraint Effects in a National Advisory Referendum Survey on the Kyoto Protocol , 2005 .

[5]  J. Schade,et al.  Acceptability of urban transport pricing strategies , 2003 .

[6]  Using contingent valuation to explore willingness to pay for renewable energy: A comparison of collective and voluntary payment vehicles , 2002 .

[7]  L. Persson,et al.  To tax, or not to tax: preferences for climate policy attributes , 2012 .

[8]  Håkon Sælen,et al.  A choice experiment on fuel taxation and earmarking in Norway , 2011 .

[9]  Jiří Karásek,et al.  Green Investment Scheme: Experience and results in the Czech Republic , 2016 .

[10]  Todd L. Cherry,et al.  Do you not like Pigou, or do you not understand him? Tax aversion and revenue recycling in the lab , 2011 .

[11]  E. Lanzi,et al.  Plan or React? Analysis of Adaptation Costs and Benefits Using Integrated Assessment Models , 2011 .

[12]  David N. Barton,et al.  The transferability of benefit transfer: contingent valuation of water quality improvements in Costa Rica , 2002 .

[13]  Michael Greenstone,et al.  Using and improving the social cost of carbon , 2014, Science.

[14]  Martin Achtnicht,et al.  German Car Buyers' Willingness to Pay to Reduce Co2 Emissions , 2012 .

[15]  Richard A. Berk,et al.  Public Perceptions of Climate Change: A 'Willingness to Pay' Assessment , 1998 .

[16]  George MacKerron,et al.  Willingness to pay for carbon offset certification and co-benefits among (high-)flying young adults in the UK , 2009 .

[17]  P. Urwin,et al.  Citizen versus consumer: challenges in the UK green power market , 2001 .

[18]  Robert P. Berrens,et al.  Would developing country commitments affect US households' support for a modified Kyoto Protocol? , 2004 .

[19]  Anna Alberini,et al.  How Effective are Energy-Efficiency Incentive Programs? Evidence from Italian Homeowners , 2014 .

[20]  S. Schneider,et al.  Climate Change 2001: Synthesis Report: A contribution of Working Groups I, II, and III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2001 .

[21]  Alberto Longo,et al.  The Internalization of Externalities in the Production of Electricity: Willingness to Pay for the Attributes of a Policy for Renewable Energy , 2006 .

[22]  J. Garvill,et al.  Acceptability of travel demand management measures: The importance of problem awareness, personal norm, freedom, and fairness , 2006 .

[23]  Richard T. Carson,et al.  Contingent Valuation: A Comprehensive Bibliography and History , 2012 .

[24]  Milan Ščasný,et al.  Public acceptability of climate change mitigation policies: a discrete choice experiment , 2017 .

[25]  N. Hanley,et al.  Is the Income Elasticity of the Willingness to Pay for Pollution Control Constant? , 2017 .

[26]  D. Skuras,et al.  The income elasticity of Willingness-To-Pay (WTP) revisited: A meta-analysis of studies for restoring Good Ecological Status (GES) of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive (WFD). , 2016, Journal of environmental management.

[27]  Dimitrios Andreopoulos,et al.  To transfer or not to transfer? Evidence from validity and reliability tests for international transfers of non-market adaptation benefits in river basins. , 2017, Journal of environmental management.

[28]  D. Pearce.  Framework for Assessing the Distribution of Environmental Quality , 2006 .

[29]  Richard S. J. Tol,et al.  Targets for global climate policy: an overview , 2013 .

[30]  Makoto Akai,et al.  Willingness to pay for green electricity in Japan as estimated through contingent valuation method , 2004 .

[31]  N. Stern.  What is the Economics of Climate Change , 2006 .

[32]  Milan Ščasný,et al.  Study on benefit transfer in an international setting. How to improve welfare estimates in the case of the countries' income heterogeneity? , 2010 .

[33]  Timo Goeschl,et al.  Willingness to Pay for Voluntary Climate Action and Its Determinants: Field-Experimental Evidence , 2014 .

[34]  Andreas Löschel,et al.  The Demand for Climate Protection - Empirical Evidence from Germany , 2013 .

[35]  Richard S.J. Tol,et al.  The marginal damage costs of carbon-dioxide emissions’ , 2005 .

[36]  P. Riera,et al.  Is the income elasticity of environmental improvements less than one? , 1996 .

[37]  Nick Hanley,et al.  Are There Income Effects on Global Willingness to Pay for Biodiversity Conservation? , 2009 .

[38]  A. Longo,et al.  Willingness to Pay for Ancillary Benefits of Climate Change Mitigation , 2012 .

[39]  R. Zeckhauser,et al.  The Perception and Valuation of the Risks of Climate Change: A Rational and Behavioral Blend , 2005 .

[40]  M. Schlesinger,et al.  Country-Specific Market Impacts of Climate Change , 2000 .

[41]  Roy Brouwer,et al.  “A convenient truth”: air travel passengers’ willingness to pay to offset their CO2 emissions , 2008 .

[42]  Thilo Muthke,et al.  National and International Benefit Transfer Testing with a Rigorous Test Procedure , 2004 .

[43]  Robert P. Berrens,et al.  Information and effort in contingent valuation surveys: application to global climate change using national internet samples ☆ , 2004 .

[44]  Kenneth Train,et al.  Customers' Choice Among Retail Energy Suppliers: The Willingness-to-Pay for Service Attributes , 2000 .

[45]  K. Train.  Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2003 .

[46]  Joshua M. Duke,et al.  Socioeconomic adjustments and choice experiment benefit function transfer: Evaluating the common wisdom , 2010 .

[47]  U. Ebert.  Environmental Goods and the Distribution of Income , 2003 .

[48]  M. Greenstone,et al.  Developing a Social Cost of Carbon for US Regulatory Analysis: A Methodology and Interpretation , 2013, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[49]  Income inequality and willingness to pay for environmental public goods , 2017 .

[50]  B. Roe,et al.  US consumers' willingness to pay for green electricity , 2001 .

[51]  Ståle Navrud,et al.  International benefit transfer: Methods and validity tests , 2006 .

[52]  R. Brännlund,et al.  Climate Policy Measures: What do people prefer ? , 2009 .

[53]  Christopher E. Clarke.  A Question of Balance , 2008 .

[54]  J. Meyerhoff,et al.  Choosing a Functional Form for an International Benefit Transfer: Evidence from a Nine-country Valuation Experiment , 2017 .