Digital Twin Based Optimization of a Manufacturing Execution System to Handle High Degrees of Customer Specifications

Lean production principles have greatly contributed to the efficient and customer-oriented mass production of goods and services. A core element of lean production is the focus on cycle times and designing production controls and buffers around any bottlenecks in the system. Hence, a production line organized by lean principles will operate in a static or at least quasi-static way. While the individualization of products is an interesting business approach, it can influence cycle times and in-time production. This work demonstrates how performance losses induced by highly variable cycle times can be recovered using a digital twin. The unit under analysis is an industrial joiner’s workshop. Due to the high variance in cycle time, the joinery fails its production target, even if all machines are below 80% usage. Using a discrete event simulation of the production line, different production strategies can be evaluated efficiently and systematically. It is successfully shown that the performance losses due to the highly variable cycle times can be compensated using a digital twin in combination with optimization strategies. This is achieved by operating the system in a non-static mode, exploiting the flexibilities within the systems.

[1]  Chao Zhang,et al.  A data- and knowledge-driven framework for digital twin manufacturing cell , 2019, Procedia CIRP.

[2]  Jason Yon,et al.  Characterising the Digital Twin: A systematic literature review , 2020, CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology.

[3]  Sang Do Noh,et al.  Digital twin-based cyber physical production system architectural framework for personalized production , 2019, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[4]  Nidhal Rezg,et al.  Contribution of simulation to the optimization of maintenance strategies for a randomly failing production system , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Dmitry Ivanov,et al.  An adaptive framework for aligning (re)planning decisions on supply chain strategy, design, tactics, and operations , 2010 .

[6]  Do Ngoc Hien,et al.  Lean Line Balancing for an Electronics Assembly Line , 2016 .

[7]  Jeffrey K. Liker,et al.  The Toyota Production System and art: making highly customized and creative products the Toyota way , 2007 .

[8]  Felix T.S. Chan,et al.  Defining a Digital Twin-based Cyber-Physical Production System for autonomous manufacturing in smart shop floors , 2019, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[9]  Julia Siderska Application of Tecnomatix Plant Simulation for Modeling Production and Logistics Processes , 2016 .

[10]  Asli Yagmur Akbulut,et al.  The role of ERP tools in supply chain information sharing, cooperation, and cost optimization , 2005 .

[11]  Jeffrey D. Ullman,et al.  NP-Complete Scheduling Problems , 1975, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[12]  Dominik Deradjat,et al.  Decision trees for implementing rapid manufacturing for mass customisation , 2018, CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology.

[13]  Per Hilletofth,et al.  Agent based decision support in the supply chain context , 2012, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[14]  Hajar Fatorachian,et al.  Impact of Industry 4.0 on supply chain performance , 2020, Production Planning & Control.

[15]  Bruno G. Rüttimann,et al.  Lean and Industry 4.0—Twins, Partners, or Contenders? A Due Clarification Regarding the Supposed Clash of Two Production Systems , 2016 .

[16]  Herwig Winkler,et al.  Integrating the Digital Twin of the manufacturing system into a decision support system for improving the order management process , 2018 .