On the ranking of chemicals based on their PBT characteristics: comparison of different ranking methodologies using selected POPs as an illustrative example.

Knowledge of the environmental behavior of chemicals is a fundamental part of the risk assessment process. The present paper discusses various methods of ranking of a series of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) according to the persistence, bioaccumulation and toxicity (PBT) characteristics. Traditionally ranking has been done as an absolute (total) ranking applying various multicriteria data analysis methods like simple additive ranking (SAR) or various utility functions (UFs) based rankings. An attractive alternative to these ranking methodologies appears to be partial order ranking (POR). The present paper compares different ranking methods like SAR, UF and POR. Significant discrepancies between the rankings are noted and it is concluded that partial order ranking, as a method without any pre-assumptions concerning possible relation between the single parameters, appears as the most attractive ranking methodology. In addition to the initial ranking partial order methodology offers a wide variety of analytical tools to elucidate the interplay between the objects to be ranked and the ranking parameters. In the present study is included an analysis of the relative importance of the single P, B and T parameters.

[1]  Rainer Bruggemann,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analyses. Viewing MCDA in terms of both process and aggregation methods: some thoughts, motivated by the paper of Huang, Keisler and Linkov. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[2]  Ganapati P. Patil,et al.  Multicriteria prioritization and partial order in environmental sciences , 2010, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[3]  Rainer Brüggemann,et al.  Estimation of Averaged Ranks by a Local Partial Order Model , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[4]  G. Munda.  Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation for a Sustainable Economy , 2007 .

[5]  Lars Carlsen.  Assessment of chemicals applying partial order ranking techniques. , 2008, Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening.

[6]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: ten years of applications and trends. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[7]  Annoni Paola,et al.  Weighting intervals and ranking, exemplified by leaching potential of pesticides , 2013 .

[8]  Ole John Nielsen,et al.  Comparison of the combined monitoring-based and modelling-based priority setting scheme with partial order theory and random linear extensions for ranking of chemical substances. , 2002, Chemosphere.

[9]  Bernard De Baets,et al.  Exploiting the Lattice of Ideals Representation of a Poset , 2006, Fundam. Informaticae.

[10]  Rainer Brüggemann,et al.  Evaluating the relationship between chemical exposure and cryptorchidism , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[11]  Rainer Brüggemann,et al.  Applying the Concept of Partially Ordered Sets on the Ranking of Near-Shore Sediments by a Battery of Tests , 2001, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[12]  Ganapati P. Patil,et al.  Ranking and Prioritization for Multi-indicator Systems: Introduction to Partial Order Applications , 2011 .

[13]  Rainer Brüggemann,et al.  A hitchhiker's guide to poset ranking. , 2008, Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening.

[14]  Lior Pachter,et al.  Convex Rank Tests and Semigraphoids , 2007, SIAM J. Discret. Math..

[15]  Rainer Brüggemann,et al.  Introduction to partial order theory exemplified by the Evaluation of Sampling Sites , 2006 .