Advanced REACH Tool: A Bayesian Model for Occupational Exposure Assessment

This paper describes a Bayesian model for the assessment of inhalation exposures in an occupational setting; the methodology underpins a freely available web-based application for exposure assessment, the Advanced REACH Tool (ART). The ART is a higher tier exposure tool that combines disparate sources of information within a Bayesian statistical framework. The information is obtained from expert knowledge expressed in a calibrated mechanistic model of exposure assessment, data on inter- and intra-individual variability in exposures from the literature, and context-specific exposure measurements. The ART provides central estimates and credible intervals for different percentiles of the exposure distribution, for full-shift and long-term average exposures. The ART can produce exposure estimates in the absence of measurements, but the precision of the estimates improves as more data become available. The methodology presented in this paper is able to utilize partially analogous data, a novel approach designed to make efficient use of a sparsely populated measurement database although some additional research is still required before practical implementation. The methodology is demonstrated using two worked examples: an exposure to copper pyrithione in the spraying of antifouling paints and an exposure to ethyl acetate in shoe repair.

[1]  Erik Tielemans,et al.  Classification of occupational activities for assessment of inhalation exposure. , 2011, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[2]  S. Spaan,et al.  Variability in endotoxin exposure levels and consequences for exposure assessment. , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[3]  Hans Kromhout,et al.  The Advanced REACH Tool (ART): incorporation of an exposure measurement database. , 2013, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[4]  Gurumurthy Ramachandran,et al.  Toward better exposure assessment strategies--the new NIOSH initiative. , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[5]  Erik Tielemans,et al.  'Stoffenmanager', a web-based control banding tool using an exposure process model. , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[6]  J Tickner,et al.  Evaluation and further development of EASE model 2.0. , 2005, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[7]  C. Rubingh,et al.  Quantitative self-assessment of exposure to solvents among shoe repair men. , 2007, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[8]  Raymond Vincent,et al.  CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR PROBABILITIES OF EXCEEDING THRESHOLD LIMITS WITH CENSORED LOG‐NORMAL DATA , 1996 .

[9]  Andrew Thomas,et al.  The BUGS project: Evolution, critique and future directions , 2009, Statistics in medicine.

[10]  Thomas Mathew,et al.  Model-based imputation approach for data analysis in the presence of non-detects. , 2009, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[11]  Stephen P. Brooks,et al.  Markov chain Monte Carlo method and its application , 1998 .

[12]  H. Kromhout,et al.  Are variance components of exposure heterogeneous between time periods and factories in the European carbon black industry? , 2006, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[13]  P. Hewett,et al.  A comparison of several methods for analyzing censored data. , 2007, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[14]  H. Kromhout,et al.  Cross-validation and refinement of the Stoffenmanager as a first tier exposure assessment tool for REACH , 2009, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[15]  W. Chan,et al.  A meta-analytic approach for characterizing the within-worker and between-worker sources of variation in occupational exposure. , 2006, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[16]  D. Helsel,et al.  Much ado about next to nothing: incorporating nondetects in science. , 2010, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[17]  W. Fransman,et al.  Development and evaluation of an exposure control efficacy library (ECEL). , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[18]  Lawrence L. Kupper,et al.  Application of mixed models to assess exposures monitored by construction workers during hot processes , 1999 .

[19]  Hans Kromhout,et al.  Advanced REACH Tool (ART): calibration of the mechanistic model. , 2011, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[20]  E. Symanski,et al.  A comprehensive evaluation of within- and between-worker components of occupational exposure to chemical agents. , 1993, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[21]  P. Sottas,et al.  An empirical hierarchical Bayesian unification of occupational exposure assessment methods , 2009, Statistics in medicine.

[22]  L. Kupper,et al.  Application of mixed models to assess exposures monitored by construction workers during hot processes. , 1999, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[23]  Hans Kromhout,et al.  Advanced Reach Tool (ART): development of the mechanistic model. , 2011, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[24]  N. Warren,et al.  Trends in blood lead levels in UK workers, 1995–2007 , 2010, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[25]  G W Hughson,et al.  Determination of dermal exposures during mixing, spraying and wiping activities. , 2004, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[26]  Sudipto Banerjee,et al.  Rating Exposure Control Using Bayesian Decision Analysis , 2006, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[27]  Derk Brouwer,et al.  Advanced REACH Tool: development and application of the substance emission potential modifying factor. , 2011, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[28]  Wouter Fransman,et al.  Revisiting the effect of room size and general ventilation on the relationship between near- and far-field air concentrations. , 2011, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[29]  Hans Kromhout,et al.  Advanced REACH Tool (ART): overview of version 1.0 and research needs. , 2011, The Annals of occupational hygiene.