Precision and reliability of retinal thickness measurements in foveal and extrafoveal areas of healthy and diabetic eyes.

PURPOSE To determine the precision and reliability of retinal thickness measurements with an optical coherence tomograph (Stratus OCT 3; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA) and a retinal thickness analyzer (RTA; Talia Technology Ltd., Neve-Ilan, Israel) in foveal, parafoveal, and perifoveal areas. METHODS Three measurements of all areas were performed within 1 hour on the same day with each instrument in the eyes of healthy volunteers and diabetic patients. The latter group was divided into eyes with and without macular edema. RESULTS Measurement precision, expressed as the 95% limits of agreement (LA 95%), was significantly higher (i.e., a lower LA 95%, P < 0.01) for the OCT in comparison to the RTA in virtually all areas of the retina. Moreover, measurement reliability, expressed as the intraclass correlation coefficient, was high with the OCT (>0.90) and moderate to low with the RTA (0.26-0.89). A direct influence of macular edema itself on measurement precision of para- and perifoveal areas was found in the OCT measurements. CONCLUSIONS The high measurement precision and reliability of the OCT suggests that this instrument is currently the most suitable technique for detection and follow-up of diabetic macular edema. When macular edema is present, the OCT can reliably detect changes of at least 36 microm at the fovea, 55 microm in parafoveal areas below a thickness of 744 microm, and 42 microm in perifoveal areas below a thickness of 1011 microm.

[1]  A Erginay,et al.  Reproducibility of retinal mapping using optical coherence tomography. , 2001, Archives of ophthalmology.

[2]  D. Weinberger,et al.  Retinal thickness variation in the diabetic patient measured by the retinal thickness analyser , 1998, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[3]  Francesco Bandello,et al.  Repeatability and reproducibility of fast macular thickness mapping with stratus optical coherence tomography. , 2005, Archives of ophthalmology.

[4]  A Yoshida,et al.  RETINAL THICKNESS MEASUREMENTS WITH OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY AND THE SCANNING RETINAL THICKNESS ANALYZER , 2001, Retina.

[5]  Rob G L van der Heijde,et al.  RETINAL THICKNESS ANALYSIS (RTA): An Objective Method to Assess and Quantify the Retinal Thickness in Healthy Controls and in Diabetics Without Diabetic Retinopathy , 2002, Retina.

[6]  D. Altman,et al.  Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading , 1995, The Lancet.

[7]  S. Asrani,et al.  A new method for rapid mapping of the retinal thickness at the posterior pole. , 1996, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[8]  K. Emi,et al.  Quantitative assessment of macular thickness in normal subjects and patients with diabetic retinopathy by scanning retinal thickness analyser , 1999, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  P. Campochiaro,et al.  Comparison between retinal thickness analyzer and optical coherence tomography for assessment of foveal thickness in eyes with macular disease. , 2002, American journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  Eric A. Swanson,et al.  Quantitative Assessment of Macular Edema With Optical Coherence Tomography , 1995 .

[11]  H. Lemij,et al.  Estimating the clinical usefulness of optic disc biometry for detecting glaucomatous change over time , 2006, Eye.

[12]  T. Wong,et al.  Management of diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review. , 2007, JAMA.

[13]  Su-Qin Yu,et al.  Quantitative in vivo retinal thickness measurement in chinese healthy subjects with retinal thickness analyzer. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[14]  G. Wollstein,et al.  Reproducibility of nerve fiber thickness, macular thickness, and optic nerve head measurements using StratusOCT. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.