Directionally selective retinal ganglion cells suppress luminance responses during natural viewing

The ON-OFF directionally selective cells of the retina respond preferentially to movement in a preferred direction, but under laboratory conditions they are also sensitive to changes in the luminance of the stationary stimulus. If the response of these neurons contains information about both direction and luminance downstream neurons are faced with the challenge of extracting the motion component, a computation that may be difficult under certain viewing conditions. Here, we show that during natural viewing the response to luminance is suppressed, leaving a relatively pure motion signal that gets transmitted to the brain.

[1]  K A Martin,et al.  A brief history of the "feature detector". , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[2]  Kyle Johnson,et al.  Parallel Mechanisms Encode Direction in the Retina , 2011, Neuron.

[3]  S. Solomon,et al.  Inner retinal inhibition shapes the receptive field of retinal ganglion cells in primate , 2013, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  D. I. Vaney,et al.  Distinct Roles for Inhibition in Spatial and Temporal Tuning of Local Edge Detectors in the Rabbit Retina , 2014, PloS one.

[5]  Richard H Masland,et al.  Functional inhibition in direction-selective retinal ganglion cells: spatiotemporal extent and intralaminar interactions. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  H. Barlow,et al.  Selective Sensitivity to Direction of Movement in Ganglion Cells of the Rabbit Retina , 1963, Science.

[7]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Amplitude spectra of natural images. , 1992, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[8]  A. Hughes.  Topographical relationships between the anatomy and physiology of the rabbit visual system , 1971, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[9]  Nicole C. Rust,et al.  Do We Know What the Early Visual System Does? , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  Seunghoon Lee,et al.  The Synaptic Mechanism of Direction Selectivity in Distal Processes of Starburst Amacrine Cells , 2006, Neuron.

[11]  Heinz Wässle,et al.  Parallel processing in the mammalian retina , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[12]  Bin Lin,et al.  Populations of wide‐field amacrine cells in the mouse retina , 2006, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[13]  Botond Roska,et al.  Ambient Illumination Toggles a Neuronal Circuit Switch in the Retina and Visual Perception at Cone Threshold , 2013, Neuron.

[14]  W. Levick,et al.  Spatial-temporal response characteristics of the ON-OFF direction selective ganglion cells in the rabbit retina , 2000, Neuroscience Letters.

[15]  W R Taylor,et al.  TTX attenuates surround inhibition in rabbit retinal ganglion cells , 1999, Visual Neuroscience.

[16]  K. Briggman,et al.  Specific Wiring of Distinct Amacrine Cells in the Directionally Selective Retinal Circuit Permits Independent Coding of Direction and Size , 2015, Neuron.

[17]  Frank S. Werblin,et al.  Mechanisms and circuitry underlying directional selectivity in the retina , 2002, Nature.

[18]  H. Barlow,et al.  The mechanism of directionally selective units in rabbit's retina. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  D. Baylor,et al.  Mosaic arrangement of ganglion cell receptive fields in rabbit retina. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  Redundancy in the Population Code of the Retina , 2005, Neuron.

[21]  N. Daw,et al.  Directionally sensitive ganglion cells in the rabbit retina: specificity for stimulus direction, size, and speed. , 1975, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  D J Field,et al.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[23]  Chuan-Chin Chiao,et al.  Contextual tuning of direction-selective retinal ganglion cells , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  Botond Roska,et al.  Parallel processing in retinal ganglion cells: how integration of space-time patterns of excitation and inhibition form the spiking output. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  P. Cook,et al.  Lateral inhibition in the inner retina is important for spatial tuning of ganglion cells , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  H B Barlow,et al.  PATTERN RECOGNITION AND THE RESPONSES OF SENSORY NEURONS * , 1969, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[27]  H. Barlow,et al.  Retinal ganglion cells responding selectively to direction and speed of image motion in the rabbit , 1964, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  B. Völgyi,et al.  Morphology and physiology of the polyaxonal amacrine cells in the rabbit retina , 2001, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[29]  Rodrigo F. Salazar,et al.  Responses to natural scenes in cat V1. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  E. V. Famiglietti,et al.  Starburst amacrine cells: morphological constancy and systematic variation in the anisotropic field of rabbit retinal neurons , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[31]  D. Kerschensteiner,et al.  An excitatory amacrine cell detects object motion and provides feature-selective input to ganglion cells in the mouse retina , 2015, eLife.

[32]  W. Levick,et al.  Properties of rarely encountered types of ganglion cells in the cat's retina and on overall classification , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[33]  J. Touryan,et al.  Spatial Structure of Complex Cell Receptive Fields Measured with Natural Images , 2005, Neuron.

[34]  Garrett B Stanley,et al.  The episodic nature of spike trains in the early visual pathway. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  R C Reid,et al.  Efficient Coding of Natural Scenes in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus: Experimental Test of a Computational Theory , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  Curtis L Baker,et al.  Natural versus Synthetic Stimuli for Estimating Receptive Field Models: A Comparison of Predictive Robustness , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  V. Balasubramanian,et al.  Lag normalization in an electrically coupled neural network , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[38]  William Bialek,et al.  Statistics of Natural Images: Scaling in the Woods , 1993, NIPS.

[39]  Gidon Felsen,et al.  A natural approach to studying vision , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[40]  Feng Qi Han,et al.  Cortical Sensitivity to Visual Features in Natural Scenes , 2005, PLoS biology.

[41]  J. Gallant,et al.  Natural Stimulus Statistics Alter the Receptive Field Structure of V1 Neurons , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  Stephen A. Baccus,et al.  Segregation of object and background motion in the retina , 2003, Nature.

[43]  Seunghoon Lee,et al.  An Unconventional Glutamatergic Circuit in the Retina Formed by vGluT3 Amacrine Cells , 2014, Neuron.

[44]  J. Atick,et al.  STATISTICS OF NATURAL TIME-VARYING IMAGES , 1995 .