Model-Based Adaptive Behavior Framework for Optimal Acoustic Communication and Sensing by Marine Robots

In this paper, a hybrid data- and model-based autonomous environmental adaptation framework is presented which allows autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) with acoustic sensors to follow a path which optimizes their ability to maintain connectivity with an acoustic contact for optimal sensing or communication. The adaptation framework is implemented within the behavior-based mission-oriented operating suite-interval programming (MOOS-IvP) marine autonomy architecture and uses a new embedded high-fidelity acoustic modeling infrastructure, the generic robotic acoustic model (GRAM), to provide real-time estimates of the acoustic environment under changing environmental and situational scenarios. A set of behaviors that combine adaptation to the current acoustic environment with strategies that extend the decision horizon beyond that of typical behavior-based systems have been developed, implemented, and demonstrated in a series of field experiments and virtual experiments in a MOOS-IvP simulation.

[1]  J. Preisig,et al.  Estimation of Rapidly Time-Varying Sparse Channels , 2007, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[2]  Henrik Schmidt,et al.  Cooperative autonomy for contact investigation , 2010, OCEANS'10 IEEE SYDNEY.

[3]  Carlos Silvestre,et al.  Mission Control of the Marius Autonomous Underwater Vehicle: System Design, Implementation and Sea Trials , 1998, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[4]  Hanumant Singh,et al.  Power systems for autonomous underwater vehicles , 2001 .

[5]  Lee Freitag,et al.  Analysis of channel effects on direct-sequence and frequency-hopped spread-spectrum acoustic communication , 2001 .

[6]  James Preisig,et al.  Acoustic propagation considerations for underwater acoustic communications network development , 2006, Underwater Networks.

[7]  A. Baggeroer,et al.  Acoustic telemetry - An overview , 1984, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[8]  A.J. Shafer,et al.  Autonomous cooperation of heterogeneous platforms for sea-based search tasks , 2008, OCEANS 2008.

[9]  Mark Porter,et al.  The KRAKEN normal mode program , 1992 .

[10]  Chen Tung Chen,et al.  Speed of sound in seawater at high pressures , 1977 .

[11]  Henrik Schmidt,et al.  Autonomous adaptive environmental assessment and feature tracking via autonomous underwater vehicles , 2010, OCEANS'10 IEEE SYDNEY.

[12]  John J. Leonard,et al.  Nested autonomy for unmanned marine vehicles with MOOS‐IvP , 2010, J. Field Robotics.

[13]  M. Stojanovic,et al.  Underwater Acoustic Communications: Design Considerations on the Physical Layer , 2008, 2008 Fifth Annual Conference on Wireless on Demand Network Systems and Services.

[14]  John J. Leonard,et al.  Adaptive Control of Heterogeneous Marine Sensor Platforms in an Autonomous Sensor Network , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[15]  D. T. Hughes,et al.  Sensible behaviour strategies for AUVs in ASW scenarios , 2010, OCEANS'10 IEEE SYDNEY.

[16]  Henrik Schmidt,et al.  Unified command and control for heterogeneous marine sensing networks , 2010, J. Field Robotics.

[17]  Rodney A. Brooks,et al.  Intelligence Without Reason , 1991, IJCAI.

[18]  Michael B. Porter,et al.  Computational Ocean Acoustics , 1994 .

[19]  A. Pascoal,et al.  Mission Control of the MARIUS AUV : System Design , Implementation , and Sea Trials , 2002 .