Deciphering protein dynamics from NMR data using explicit structure sampling and selection.

Perhaps one of the most prominent realizations of recent years is the critical role that protein dynamics plays in many facets of cellular function. While characterization of protein dynamics is fundamental to our understanding of protein function, the ability to explicitly detect an ensemble of protein conformations from dynamics data is a paramount challenge in structural biology. Here, we report a new computational method, Sample and Select, for determining the ensemble of protein conformations consistent with NMR dynamics data. This method can be generalized and extended to different sources of dynamics data, enabling broad applicability in deciphering protein dynamics at different timescales. The structural ensemble derived from Sample and Select will provide structural and dynamic information that should aid us in understanding and manipulating protein function.

[1]  Rieko Ishima,et al.  Protein dynamics from NMR , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[2]  J. Hermans,et al.  Comparison of a QM/MM force field and molecular mechanics force fields in simulations of alanine and glycine “dipeptides” (Ace‐Ala‐Nme and Ace‐Gly‐Nme) in water in relation to the problem of modeling the unfolded peptide backbone in solution , 2003, Proteins.

[3]  A. Szabó,et al.  Model-free approach to the interpretation of nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in macromolecules. 1. Theory and range of validity , 1982 .

[4]  S. Buldyrev,et al.  Folding Trp-cage to NMR resolution native structure using a coarse-grained protein model. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[5]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath , 1984 .

[6]  H. Stanley,et al.  Discrete molecular dynamics studies of the folding of a protein-like model. , 1998, Folding & design.

[7]  Simulated and NMR-derived backbone dynamics of a protein with significant flexibility: a comparison of spectral densities for the betaARK1 PH domain. , 2001, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[8]  Comparison of 2H and 13C NMR Relaxation Techniques for the Study of Protein Methyl Group Dynamics in Solution , 1999 .

[9]  Tim Hesterberg,et al.  Monte Carlo Strategies in Scientific Computing , 2002, Technometrics.

[10]  Jeremy C. Smith,et al.  The role of dynamics in enzyme activity. , 2003, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[11]  Hao Hu,et al.  Increased rigidity of eglin c at acidic pH: evidence from NMR spin relaxation and MD simulations. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[12]  C. Brooks,et al.  Recent advances in the development and application of implicit solvent models in biomolecule simulations. , 2004, Current opinion in structural biology.

[13]  Peter A. Kollman,et al.  AMBER, a package of computer programs for applying molecular mechanics, normal mode analysis, molecular dynamics and free energy calculations to simulate the structural and energetic properties of molecules , 1995 .

[14]  G. Lipari Model-free approach to the interpretation of nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in macromolecules , 1982 .

[15]  J. Thornton,et al.  PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures , 1993 .

[16]  David A Case,et al.  Molecular dynamics and NMR spin relaxation in proteins. , 2002, Accounts of chemical research.

[17]  Feng Ding,et al.  Folding of Cu, Zn superoxide dismutase and familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  A. Palmer,et al.  Temperature dependence of intramolecular dynamics of the basic leucine zipper of GCN4: implications for the entropy of association with DNA. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  J. Berg,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules , 2002, Nature Structural Biology.

[20]  V. Hornak,et al.  Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters , 2006, Proteins.

[21]  Bernard R. Brooks,et al.  Molecular Dynamics of Staphylococcal Nuclease: Comparison of Simulation with 15N and 13C NMR Relaxation Data , 1998 .

[22]  C. Dobson,et al.  Structural determinants of protein dynamics: analysis of 15N NMR relaxation measurements for main-chain and side-chain nuclei of hen egg white lysozyme. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[23]  M. DePristo,et al.  Simultaneous determination of protein structure and dynamics , 2005, Nature.

[24]  Nikolay V Dokholyan,et al.  Insights into Allosteric Control of Vinculin Function from Its Large Scale Conformational Dynamics* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[25]  J. Thornton,et al.  Stereochemical quality of protein structure coordinates , 1992, Proteins.

[26]  Dynamics and entropy of a calmodulin-peptide complex studied by NMR and molecular dynamics. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[27]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[28]  S. Lowen The Biophysical Journal , 1960, Nature.

[29]  Feng Ding,et al.  Simple but predictive protein models. , 2005, Trends in biotechnology.

[30]  M. Karplus,et al.  The origin of protein sidechain order parameter distributions. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[31]  G. Ciccotti,et al.  Numerical Integration of the Cartesian Equations of Motion of a System with Constraints: Molecular Dynamics of n-Alkanes , 1977 .

[32]  Andrew L. Lee,et al.  Relating side-chain mobility in proteins to rotameric transitions: Insights from molecular dynamics simulations and NMR , 2005, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[33]  A. Bax Weak alignment offers new NMR opportunities to study protein structure and dynamics , 2003, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[34]  F. Ding,et al.  New insights into FAK signaling and localization based on detection of a FAT domain folding intermediate. , 2004, Structure.

[35]  M. Vendruscolo,et al.  Determination of protein structures consistent with NMR order parameters. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[36]  J. B. Johnson,et al.  Ligand binding to heme proteins: connection between dynamics and function. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[37]  M. Buck,et al.  Backbone dynamics of the ribonuclease binase active site area using multinuclear ((15)N and (13)CO) NMR relaxation and computational molecular dynamics. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[38]  M. Moorhouse,et al.  The Protein Databank , 2005 .

[39]  A. Joshua Wand,et al.  Dynamic activation of protein function: A view emerging from NMR spectroscopy , 2001, Nature Structural Biology.

[40]  A. Palmer,et al.  Dynamic properties of proteins from NMR spectroscopy. , 1993, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[41]  K. Lindorff-Larsen,et al.  Interpreting Dynamically-Averaged Scalar Couplings in Proteins , 2005, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[42]  P. Sopp Cluster analysis. , 1996, Veterinary immunology and immunopathology.

[43]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[44]  Feng Ding,et al.  Emergence of Protein Fold Families through Rational Design , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[45]  Lewis E. Kay,et al.  New Tools Provide New Insights in NMR Studies of Protein Dynamics , 2006, Science.

[46]  D. Kern,et al.  The role of dynamics in allosteric regulation. , 2003, Current opinion in structural biology.

[47]  J. Bushweller,et al.  CBFβ allosterically regulates the Runx1 Runt domain via a dynamic conformational equilibrium , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[48]  A. Palmer,et al.  Nmr probes of molecular dynamics: overview and comparison with other techniques. , 2001, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[49]  J. Forman-Kay,et al.  Calculation of ensembles of structures representing the unfolded state of an SH3 domain. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[50]  A. Bax,et al.  Rotational diffusion anisotropy of human ubiquitin from 15N NMR relaxation , 1995 .

[51]  Hydrophobic core fluidity of homologous protein domains: relation of side-chain dynamics to core composition and packing. , 2004, Biochemistry.