Objective: The aim of this study is to design a sampling inspection plan with human error which is changing according to inspection time. Background: Typical sampling inspection plans have been established typically based on an assumption of the perfect inspection without human error. However, most of all inspection tasks include human errors in the process of inspection. Therefore, a sampling inspection plan should be designed with consideration of imperfect inspection. Method: A model for single sampling inspection plans were proposed for the cases that visual inspection error rate is changing according to inspection time. Additionally, a sampling inspection plan for an optimal inspection time was proposed. In order to show an applied example of the proposed model, an experiment for visual inspection task was performed and the inspection error rates were measured according to the inspection time. Results: Inspection error rates changed according to inspection time. The inspection error rate could be reflected on the single sampling inspection plans for attribute. In particular, inspection error rate in an optimal inspection time may be used for a reasonable single sampling plan in a practical view. Conclusion: Human error rate in inspection tasks should be reflected on typical single sampling inspection plans. A sampling inspection plan with consideration of human error requires more sampling number than a typical sampling plan with perfect inspection. Application: The result of this research may help to determine more practical sampling inspection plan rather than typical one.
[1]
Kenneth E. Case,et al.
The Dodge CSP-1 Continuous Sampling Plan Under Inspection Error1
,
1973
.
[2]
R. McKenzie.
ON THE ACCURACY OF INSPECTORS
,
1958
.
[3]
B. L. Foote,et al.
An Approach to Compensate for Uncertainty in Knowledge of Inspector Error
,
1982
.
[4]
Colin G. Drury,et al.
Signal detection for human error correction in quality control
,
1995
.
[5]
T H Monk.
Sequential effects in visual search.
,
1974,
Acta psychologica.
[6]
Ulrich Menzefricke,et al.
The Effects of Variability in Inspector Error
,
1984
.
[7]
Kenneth E. Case,et al.
The Distribution of Observed Defectives in Attribute Acceptance Sampling Plans Under Inspection Error
,
1976
.
[8]
Kenneth E. Case,et al.
The Effect of Inspection Error on Average Outgoing Quality
,
1975
.
[9]
C G Drury,et al.
Predicting Search Performance for Multiple Targets
,
1980,
Human factors.