Considerations on privacy in the era of digitally logged lives

The continuous advancements in wearable sensing technologies enable the easy collection and publishing of visual lifelog data. The widespread adaptation of visual lifelog technologies would have the potential to pose challenges for ensuring the personal privacy of subjects and bystanders in lifelog data. This paper presents preliminary findings from a study of lifeloggers with the aim of better understanding their concerns regarding privacy in lifelog data.,In this study, we have collected a visual dataset of 64,837 images from 25 lifelogging participants over a period of two days each, and we conducted an interactive session (face to face conversation) with each participant in order to capture their concerns when sharing the lifelog data across three specified categories (i.e. Private (Only for Me), Semi-Private (Family/Friends) and Public).,In general, we found that participants tend to err on the side of conservative privacy settings and that there is a noticeable difference in what different participants are willing to share. In summary, we found that the categories of images that the participants wished to be kept private included personally identifiable information and professional information; categories of images that could be shared with family/friends include family moments or content related to daily routine lifestyle, and other visual lifelog data could potentially be made public).,We analysed the potential differences in the willingness of 25 participants to share data. In addition, reasons for being a volunteer to collect lifelog data and how the lifelogging device affected the lifestyle of the lifelogger are analysed. Based on the findings of this study, we propose a set of challenges for the anonymisation of lifelog data that should be solved when supporting lifelog data sharing.

[1]  J. Phelps,et al.  Privacy Concerns and Consumer Willingness to Provide Personal Information , 2000 .

[2]  Elin Palm The Dimensions of Privacy , 2005 .

[3]  S. Marshall,et al.  An ethical framework for automated, wearable cameras in health behavior research. , 2013, American journal of preventive medicine.

[4]  Heather J. Ruskin,et al.  NTCIR-12 Lifelog Data Analytics , 2016, LTA@MM.

[5]  L. Signal,et al.  Capturing exposures: using automated cameras to document environmental determinants of obesity. , 2015, Health promotion international.

[6]  Bahram Jalali,et al.  Making silicon lase. , 2007, Scientific American.

[7]  Steven Simske,et al.  Beyond quantified self: data for wellbeing , 2014, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[8]  Joseph Gray Jackson,et al.  Privacy and Freedom , 1968 .

[9]  Jiang Zhou,et al.  The use of wearable cameras in assessing children's dietary intake and behaviours in China , 2019, Appetite.

[10]  Abdelmalek Benattayallah,et al.  An fMRI study of long-term everyday memory using SenseCam , 2011, Memory.

[11]  Rami Albatal,et al.  A privacy by design approach to lifelogging , 2014 .

[12]  Michael Riegler,et al.  Building a Disclosed Lifelog Dataset: Challenges, Principles and Processes , 2017, CBMI.

[13]  K. O’Hara,et al.  Lifelogging: Privacy and empowerment with memories for life , 2008 .

[14]  Rami Albatal,et al.  Negative FaceBlurring: A Privacy-by-Design Approach to Visual Lifelogging with Google Glass , 2014, CIKM.

[15]  A. Bandara,et al.  Open Research Online , 2020 .

[16]  P. Barnard,et al.  Exploring the basis and boundary conditions of SenseCam-facilitated recollection , 2011, Memory.

[17]  Marc Langheinrich,et al.  Remembering through lifelogging: A survey of human memory augmentation , 2016, Pervasive Mob. Comput..

[18]  Kelly A. Mackintosh,et al.  Can Wearable Cameras Be Used to Validate School-Aged Children’s Lifestyle Behaviours? , 2019, Children.

[19]  Alan F. Smeaton,et al.  LifeLogging: Personal Big Data , 2014, Found. Trends Inf. Retr..

[20]  Steve Hodges,et al.  Neuropsychological Rehabilitation , 2013 .

[21]  Jean-Christophe Nebel,et al.  Recognition of Activities of Daily Living with Egocentric Vision: A Review , 2016, Sensors.

[22]  P. Schofield,et al.  The use of a wearable camera to explore daily functioning of older adults living with persistent pain: Methodological reflections and recommendations , 2018, Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering.

[23]  Refik Molva,et al.  Safebook: A privacy-preserving online social network leveraging on real-life trust , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[24]  Rami Albatal,et al.  NTCIR Lifelog: The First Test Collection for Lifelog Research , 2016, SIGIR.

[25]  David J. Crandall,et al.  Enhancing Lifelogging Privacy by Detecting Screens , 2016, CHI.

[26]  Alan F. Smeaton,et al.  An Examination of a Large Visual Lifelog , 2008, AIRS.

[27]  Jiang Zhou,et al.  Kids'Cam: An Objective Methodology to Study the World in Which Children Live. , 2017, American journal of preventive medicine.

[28]  Vannevar Bush,et al.  As we may think , 1945, INTR.

[29]  Heather J. Ruskin,et al.  Finding Motifs in Large Personal Lifelogs , 2016, AH.

[30]  David J. Crandall,et al.  Sensitive Lifelogs: A Privacy Analysis of Photos from Wearable Cameras , 2015, CHI.

[31]  Adir Even,et al.  The metadata enigma , 2006, CACM.

[32]  Blaine A. Price,et al.  Logging you, Logging me , 2017, Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol..

[33]  G. Bell,et al.  A digital life , 2007 .

[34]  Gordon Bell,et al.  MyLifeBits: a personal database for everything , 2006, CACM.

[35]  Joemon M. Jose,et al.  Exploring lifelog sharing and privacy , 2016, UbiComp Adjunct.