Empowering project teams: toward an integrative conceptualization of empowerment

Despite its long history, empowerment still remains a diffuse concept; a characteristic that has retarded its development and appropriate use. The theoretical underpinnings of empowerment are explicated in order to provide a thorough understanding and the much needed clarity. Towards this, two distinct approaches to the empowerment concept, structural and psychological, are differentiated and their complementarities articulated. Integrating the managerial or organisational acts/practices supportive of empowerment (structural approach) and employee cognition of empowerment (psychological approach) presents a unifying perspective that facilitates better understanding of the dynamics of the empowerment process. A multilevel perspective that exposes a paradox of empowerment in project teams is also explored and the implications for research and practice of such an integrative-multilevel conceptualisation consequently outlined.

[1]  J. Mathieu,et al.  Empowerment and team effectiveness: an empirical test of an integrated model. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[2]  Mary Anne Devanna.  Men and Women of the Corporation , 1978 .

[3]  Anita M. M. Liu,et al.  WORK EMPOWERMENT AS AN ANTECEDENT OF ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT IN THE HONG KONG QUANTITY SURVEYING PROFESSION , 2006 .

[4]  S. Seibert.  TAKING EMPOWERMENT TO THE NEXT LEVEL : A MULTIPLE-LEVEL MODEL OF EMPOWERMENT , PERFORMANCE , AND SATISFACTION , 2004 .

[5]  Stephen W. Nason,et al.  A Dimensional Analysis of the Relationship between Psychological Empowerment and Effectiveness Satisfaction, and Strain , 1997 .

[6]  C. S. Koberg,et al.  Antecedents and Outcomes of Empowerment , 1999 .

[7]  Claus W. Langfred.  The paradox of self‐management: individual and group autonomy in work groups , 2000 .

[8]  A. Bryman,et al.  MANAGEMENT, TRANSIENCE AND SUBCONTRACTING: THE CASE OF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE , 1988 .

[9]  Russ Forrester,et al.  Empowerment: Rejuvenating a potent idea , 2000 .

[10]  S. Smithson,et al.  Employee Empowerment in Manufacturing: A Study of Organisations in the UK , 2002 .

[11]  J. Hackman,et al.  The design of work teams , 1987 .

[12]  George B. Graen,et al.  Individual Self-Management: Analysis of Professionals' Self-Managing Activities in Functional and Cross-Functional Work Teams , 1998 .

[13]  Sanjay T. Menon,et al.  Employee Empowerment: An Integrative Psychological Approach , 2001 .

[14]  Robert C. Ford,et al.  Empowerment: A matter of degree , 1995 .

[15]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[16]  A. Dainty,et al.  Human Resource Management in Construction Projects: Strategic and Operational Approaches , 2003 .

[17]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Employee empowerment in construction: an implementation model for process improvement , 2000 .

[18]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  Beyond Self-Management: Antecedents and Consequences of Team Empowerment , 1999 .

[19]  Andrew R.J. Dainty,et al.  Empowerment within the UK construction sector , 2002 .

[20]  K. Thomas,et al.  Cognitive Elements of Empowerment: An “Interpretive” Model of Intrinsic Task Motivation , 1990 .

[21]  A. Bandura.  Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[22]  G. Spreitzer.  PSYCHOLOGICAL EMPOWERMENT IN THE WORKPLACE: DIMENSIONS, MEASUREMENT, AND VALIDATION , 1995 .

[23]  Andrew R.J. Dainty,et al.  Employee perceptions of empowerment , 2005 .

[24]  R. N. Kanungo,et al.  The Empowerment Process: Integrating Theory and Practice , 1988 .

[25]  E. Lawler,et al.  Empowering Service Employees , 1995 .

[26]  Cynthia Hardy,et al.  The Power Behind Empowerment: Implications for Research and Practice , 1998 .

[27]  Anthony Walker,et al.  Project Management in Construction , 1984 .