Evaluation of the 'Lequesne's false profile' of the hip in patients with hip osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVES To compare the value of Lequesne's false profile (LFP) radiograph of the hip and antero-posterior (AP) X-ray of the pelvis in the assessment of joint space narrowing (JSN) and osteophyte (Ost) in patients with hip osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS AP and LFP radiographs of the hip were performed using a standardized method in 50 consecutive patients with hip OA. JSN and Ost were graded at different days by a single observer blinded for patients identity, using a six point scale (JSN:0-5) and a four point scale (Ost:0-3) from AP and LFP respectively. Scores obtained from AP and LFP were compared. RESULTS Mean JSN grade was significantly higher for LFP (2. 7+/-1.0) than AP (2.4+/-1.2) (P=0.001). It was identical for AP and LFP in 28 patients (56%) while the highest grade was found on LFP in 16 (32%) and on AP in 6 (12%). No significant difference between LFP and AP was found for osteophyte grading. CONCLUSION These data suggest that the combination AP+LFP provide more information than AP alone for the evaluation of joint space narrowing in about one third of patients. LFP may be helpful for the radiographic assessment of OA changes particularly in structure modifying drugs evaluation.

[1]  E. Vignon,et al.  Quantitative measurement of joint space narrowing progression in hip osteoarthritis: a longitudinal retrospective study of patients treated by total hip arthroplasty. , 1998, British journal of rheumatology.

[2]  M. Dougados,et al.  Osteoarthritis of the hip: agreement between joint space width measurements on standing and supine conventional radiographs , 1998, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[3]  E. Vignon,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of joint space width in femorotibial osteoarthritis: comparison of three radiographic views. , 1998, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[4]  R. Dussault,et al.  Radiographic measurements of dysplastic adult hips , 1997, Skeletal Radiology.

[5]  M. Dougados,et al.  Knee joint space width measurement: an experimental study of the influence of radiographic procedure and joint positioning. , 1996, British journal of rheumatology.

[6]  M. Dougados,et al.  Radiological progression of hip osteoarthritis: definition, risk factors and correlations with clinical status. , 1996, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[7]  M. Dougados,et al.  Predictors of the need for total hip replacement in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip. , 1995, Revue du rhumatisme.

[8]  E Vignon,et al.  Quantitative assessment of radiographic normal and osteoarthritic hip joint space. , 1995, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[9]  W. Vennart,et al.  Osteoarthritis and magnetic resonance imaging: potential and problems. , 1995, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[10]  M. Nevitt,et al.  Reliability of new indices of radiographic osteoarthritis of the hand and hip and lumbar disc degeneration. , 1993, The Journal of rheumatology.

[11]  M. Doherty,et al.  Radiographic patterns and associations of osteoarthritis of the hip. , 1992, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[12]  M. Helvie,et al.  Overview: new methods in imaging osteoarthritis. , 1991, The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement.

[13]  W. Murphy,et al.  The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hand. , 1990, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[14]  E. Vignon,et al.  The effects of position on the radiographic joint space in osteoarthritis of the hip. , 1997, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[15]  M Lequesne,et al.  Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis. , 1995, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[16]  P. Mathieu,et al.  Vitesse de pincement de l'interligne articulaire dans la coxarthrose , 1994 .