The Angio-Seal™ femoral closure device allows immediate ambulation after coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention.

AIMS To test the safety of immediate mobilisation of patients undergoing coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) closed with Angio-Seal™ -a femoral vascular closure device. METHODS AND RESULTS First, a randomised controlled trial of immediate mobilisation vs. delayed ambulation was performed followed by a prospective validation registry to test the obtained results in a real-world situation. The randomised trial comprised 300 patients; the validation registry comprised 1,097 patients. Primary endpoints were complications defined as: small haematoma <5 cm and/or minor bleeding/oozing from the puncture site, haematomas ≥ 5 cm, bleeding needing transfusion, bleeding needing surgical attention, pseudoaneurysm and vasovagal reaction. In the randomised trial, overall complications were similar in both groups (16.0%vs.18.8%; p=0.53). Small haematomas/small bleedings/oozing were the most frequent (12.2% vs.15.3; p=0.44). There were no bleedings needing transfusion or surgical attention, and no pseudoaneurysms occurred. The prospective registry showed similar results. In the standard-care cohort, complications were similar to those in the implementation cohort (9.6% vs.11.3%; p=0.41), mainly consisting of small haematomas/minor bleedings/oozing (6.1% vs.7.3%; p=0.49). No bleedings needed transfusion or surgical attention. Pseudoaneurysms occurred in 1 (0.34%) vs. 3 (0.37%; p=0.94) and vasovagal reactions in three (1.0%) vs. four (0.5%; p=0.33) patients. It was possible to mobilise 87% of patients in the implementation cohort. CONCLUSIONS In patients undergoing coronary angiography or PCI, the use of immediate mobilisation after Angio-Seal™ deployment is safe. With routine use of a femoral vascular closure device, approximately 87% of patients are suitable for immediate mobilisation.

[1]  F. Kahl,et al.  Trends in vascular complications after diagnostic cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention via the femoral artery, 1998 to 2007. , 2008, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[2]  F. Eberli,et al.  Drug-eluting or bare-metal stents for large coronary vessel stenting? The BASKET-PROVE (PROspective Validation Examination) trial: study protocol and design. , 2008, American heart journal.

[3]  M. Matheny,et al.  A propensity analysis of the risk of vascular complications after cardiac catheterization procedures with the use of vascular closure devices. , 2007, American heart journal.

[4]  M. Behan,et al.  A randomised controlled trial comparing the routine use of an Angio‐Seal STS device strategy with conventional femoral haemostasis methods in a district general hospital , 2007, International journal of clinical practice.

[5]  C. O'shaughnessy,et al.  The StarClose® vascular closure system: Interventional results from the CLIP study , 2006, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[6]  R. Caputo,et al.  Safety and efficacy of staple‐mediated femoral arteriotomy closure: Results from a randomized multicenter study , 2006, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[7]  W. Little,et al.  Vascular complications with newer generations of angioseal vascular closure devices. , 2006, Journal of interventional cardiology.

[8]  R. Brindis,et al.  Risk of local adverse events following cardiac catheterization by hemostasis device use - phase II. , 2005, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[9]  B. Chevalier,et al.  Effect of a closure device on complication rates in high‐local‐risk patients: Results of a randomized multicenter trial , 2003, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[10]  S. Sdringola,et al.  Outcome of access site in patients treated with platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in the era of closure devices , 2003, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[11]  H. Brunner-La Rocca,et al.  Comparison of costs and safety of a suture‐mediated closure device with conventional manual compression after coronary artery interventions , 2002, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[12]  J. Lasala,et al.  Safety and efficacy of suture‐mediated closure after percutaneous coronary interventions , 2001, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[13]  L. Ohno-Machado,et al.  Vascular closure devices and the risk of vascular complications after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients receiving glycoprotein IIb-IIIa inhibitors. , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[14]  W. Boden,et al.  Suture closure of the femoral arteriotomy following invasive cardiac procedures: A detailed analysis of efficacy, complications, and the impact of early ambulation in 1,200 consecutive, unselected cases , 2001, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[15]  B. Horne,et al.  Femoral arterial puncture management after percutaneous coronary procedures: a comparison of clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction between manual compression and two different vascular closure devices. , 2001, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[16]  E. Topol,et al.  Safety of femoral closure devices after percutaneous coronary interventions in the era of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa platelet blockade. , 2000, The American journal of cardiology.

[17]  H. Rickli,et al.  Early sheath removal after coronary artery interventions with use of a suture-mediated closure device: clinical outcome and results of Doppler US evaluation. , 2000, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[18]  S. Yasuda,et al.  A Randomised Controlled Trial of Prostar PlusTMfor Haemostasis in Patients After Coronary Angioplasty , 2000 .

[19]  D. Baim,et al.  Suture-mediated closure of the femoral access site after cardiac catheterization: results of the suture to ambulate aNd discharge (STAND I and STAND II) trials. , 2000, The American journal of cardiology.

[20]  S. Hosoda,et al.  [Efficacy of hemostatic puncture closing device for hemostasis and early ambulation after coronary angiography and angioplasty: results of a multicenter trial]. , 1999, Journal of cardiology.

[21]  U. Gerckens,et al.  Management of arterial puncture site after catheterization procedures: evaluating a suture-mediated closure device. , 1999, The American journal of cardiology.

[22]  S. Silber,et al.  Usefulness of collagen plugging with VasoSeal after PTCA as compared to manual compression with identical sheath dwell times. , 1998, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[23]  C. Simpfendorfer,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of a Hemostatic Puncture Closure Device With Early Ambulation After Coronary Angiography fn1 , 1998 .

[24]  P. Probst,et al.  Use of a Collagen Plug Versus Manual Compression for Sealing Arterial Puncture Site After Cardiac Catheterization , 1997, Angiology.

[25]  M. Leon,et al.  Rapid arterial hemostasis and decreased access site complications after cardiac catheterization and angioplasty: results of a randomized trial of a novel hemostatic device. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  V. Flintoft,et al.  A single center randomized trial assessing use of a vascular hemostasis device vs. conventional manual compression following PTCA: what are the potential resource savings? , 1995, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[27]  J. Brinker,et al.  A multicenter randomized trial comparing a percutaneous collagen hemostasis device with conventional manual compression after diagnostic angiography and angioplasty. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[28]  W. Burger,et al.  Collagen application for sealing of arterial puncture sites in comparison to pressure dressing: a randomized trial. , 1992, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[29]  J. Spinelli,et al.  Suture closure of femoral arterial puncture sites after coronary angioplasty followed by same-day discharge. , 2000, American heart journal.