The Angio-Seal™ femoral closure device allows immediate ambulation after coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention.
暂无分享,去创建一个
M. Pfisterer | J. Jensen | S. Galatius | R. Jeger | C. Kaiser | J. Madsen | A. Hvelplund | R. Osterwalder | M. Bredahl
[1] F. Kahl,et al. Trends in vascular complications after diagnostic cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention via the femoral artery, 1998 to 2007. , 2008, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.
[2] F. Eberli,et al. Drug-eluting or bare-metal stents for large coronary vessel stenting? The BASKET-PROVE (PROspective Validation Examination) trial: study protocol and design. , 2008, American heart journal.
[3] M. Matheny,et al. A propensity analysis of the risk of vascular complications after cardiac catheterization procedures with the use of vascular closure devices. , 2007, American heart journal.
[4] M. Behan,et al. A randomised controlled trial comparing the routine use of an Angio‐Seal STS device strategy with conventional femoral haemostasis methods in a district general hospital , 2007, International journal of clinical practice.
[5] C. O'shaughnessy,et al. The StarClose® vascular closure system: Interventional results from the CLIP study , 2006, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[6] R. Caputo,et al. Safety and efficacy of staple‐mediated femoral arteriotomy closure: Results from a randomized multicenter study , 2006, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[7] W. Little,et al. Vascular complications with newer generations of angioseal vascular closure devices. , 2006, Journal of interventional cardiology.
[8] R. Brindis,et al. Risk of local adverse events following cardiac catheterization by hemostasis device use - phase II. , 2005, The Journal of invasive cardiology.
[9] B. Chevalier,et al. Effect of a closure device on complication rates in high‐local‐risk patients: Results of a randomized multicenter trial , 2003, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[10] S. Sdringola,et al. Outcome of access site in patients treated with platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in the era of closure devices , 2003, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[11] H. Brunner-La Rocca,et al. Comparison of costs and safety of a suture‐mediated closure device with conventional manual compression after coronary artery interventions , 2002, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[12] J. Lasala,et al. Safety and efficacy of suture‐mediated closure after percutaneous coronary interventions , 2001, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[13] L. Ohno-Machado,et al. Vascular closure devices and the risk of vascular complications after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients receiving glycoprotein IIb-IIIa inhibitors. , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.
[14] W. Boden,et al. Suture closure of the femoral arteriotomy following invasive cardiac procedures: A detailed analysis of efficacy, complications, and the impact of early ambulation in 1,200 consecutive, unselected cases , 2001, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[15] B. Horne,et al. Femoral arterial puncture management after percutaneous coronary procedures: a comparison of clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction between manual compression and two different vascular closure devices. , 2001, The Journal of invasive cardiology.
[16] E. Topol,et al. Safety of femoral closure devices after percutaneous coronary interventions in the era of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa platelet blockade. , 2000, The American journal of cardiology.
[17] H. Rickli,et al. Early sheath removal after coronary artery interventions with use of a suture-mediated closure device: clinical outcome and results of Doppler US evaluation. , 2000, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.
[18] S. Yasuda,et al. A Randomised Controlled Trial of Prostar PlusTMfor Haemostasis in Patients After Coronary Angioplasty , 2000 .
[19] D. Baim,et al. Suture-mediated closure of the femoral access site after cardiac catheterization: results of the suture to ambulate aNd discharge (STAND I and STAND II) trials. , 2000, The American journal of cardiology.
[20] S. Hosoda,et al. [Efficacy of hemostatic puncture closing device for hemostasis and early ambulation after coronary angiography and angioplasty: results of a multicenter trial]. , 1999, Journal of cardiology.
[21] U. Gerckens,et al. Management of arterial puncture site after catheterization procedures: evaluating a suture-mediated closure device. , 1999, The American journal of cardiology.
[22] S. Silber,et al. Usefulness of collagen plugging with VasoSeal after PTCA as compared to manual compression with identical sheath dwell times. , 1998, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.
[23] C. Simpfendorfer,et al. Efficacy and Safety of a Hemostatic Puncture Closure Device With Early Ambulation After Coronary Angiography fn1 , 1998 .
[24] P. Probst,et al. Use of a Collagen Plug Versus Manual Compression for Sealing Arterial Puncture Site After Cardiac Catheterization , 1997, Angiology.
[25] M. Leon,et al. Rapid arterial hemostasis and decreased access site complications after cardiac catheterization and angioplasty: results of a randomized trial of a novel hemostatic device. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[26] V. Flintoft,et al. A single center randomized trial assessing use of a vascular hemostasis device vs. conventional manual compression following PTCA: what are the potential resource savings? , 1995, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.
[27] J. Brinker,et al. A multicenter randomized trial comparing a percutaneous collagen hemostasis device with conventional manual compression after diagnostic angiography and angioplasty. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[28] W. Burger,et al. Collagen application for sealing of arterial puncture sites in comparison to pressure dressing: a randomized trial. , 1992, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.
[29] J. Spinelli,et al. Suture closure of femoral arterial puncture sites after coronary angioplasty followed by same-day discharge. , 2000, American heart journal.