Studying Interest Measures for Association Rules through a Logical Model

Many papers have addressed the task of proposing a set of convenient axioms that a good rule interestingness measure should fulfil. We provide a new study of the principles proposed until now by means of the logic model proposed by Hajek et al.14 In this model association rules can be viewed as general relations of two itemsets quantified by means of a convenient quantifier.28 Moreover, we propose and justify the addition of two new principles to the three proposed by Piatetsky-Shapiro.27 We also use the logic approach for studying the relation between the different classes of quantifiers and these axioms. We define new classes of quantifiers according to the notions of strong and very strong rules, and we present a quantifier based on the certainty factor measure,317 studying its most salient features.

[1]  Thomas Sudkamp,et al.  Examples, counterexamples, and measuring fuzzy associations , 2005, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[2]  John A. Major,et al.  Selecting among rules induced from a hurricane database , 1993, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems.

[3]  Daniel Sánchez,et al.  Fuzzy association rules: general model and applications , 2003, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[4]  Edward H. Shortliffe,et al.  A model of inexact reasoning in medicine , 1990 .

[5]  Alex Alves Freitas,et al.  On rule interestingness measures , 1999, Knowl. Based Syst..

[6]  B. Shekar,et al.  A Framework for Evaluating Knowledge-Based Interestingness of Association Rules , 2004, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak..

[7]  Jan Rauch,et al.  Logic of Association Rules , 2004, Applied Intelligence.

[8]  Chris Cornelis,et al.  Elicitation of fuzzy association rules from positive and negative examples , 2005, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[9]  Eyke Hüllermeier,et al.  A systematic approach to the assessment of fuzzy association rules , 2006, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.

[10]  Rajeev Motwani,et al.  Beyond Market Baskets: Generalizing Association Rules to Dependence Rules , 1998, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.

[11]  Tomáš Havránek Statistical quantifiers in observational calculi: An application in GUHA-methods , 1975 .

[12]  Kenneth McGarry,et al.  A survey of interestingness measures for knowledge discovery , 2005, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[13]  Petr Hájek,et al.  The GUHA method of automatic hypotheses determination , 1966, Computing.