Subbasal Nerve Regeneration After Penetrating Keratoplasty

PURPOSE To evaluate subbasal nerve regeneration, corneal sensitivity, and tear film function after penetrating keratoplasty. METHODS Twenty keratoplasty patients were assessed before and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after penetrating keratoplasty by using noncontact corneal esthesiometry, tear breakup time measurement, the phenol red thread test, and confocal microscopy. Ten healthy control subjects were also assessed by using these techniques on 1 occasion. Subbasal nerve images were analyzed by using customized software to evaluate nerve regeneration. RESULTS Before surgery, the subbasal nerve plexus could be imaged only in 11 patients because of the existence of pathology. Significant deficits in nerve morphology were apparent in these patients compared with control subjects. No subbasal nerves were detected over the 12-month postoperative period. Central corneal sensitivity decreased significantly after surgery and returned to near normal levels after 12 months. Tear breakup time was significantly shorter at 3 and 12 months after keratoplasty. There were no significant differences in the phenol red thread test results before and after surgery. CONCLUSIONS There is no direct association between subbasal nerve fiber regeneration, central corneal sensitivity, and tear film stability and volume. The apparent recovery of corneal sensitivity to normal levels 12 months postoperatively, in the absence of clinically observable subbasal nerves, may be a methodologic phenomenon related to the inability of current-generation confocal microscopes to image fine regenerating nerves that mediate corneal sensibility.

[1]  C. McGhee,et al.  Corneal innervation and cellular changes after corneal transplantation: an in vivo confocal microscopy study. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[2]  Dipika V Patel,et al.  Contemporary in vivo confocal microscopy of the living human cornea using white light and laser scanning techniques: a major review , 2007, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[3]  N. Efron,et al.  A longitudinal case series investigating cellular changes to the transplanted cornea using confocal microscopy. , 2006, Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association.

[4]  Dipika V Patel,et al.  Mapping of the normal human corneal sub-Basal nerve plexus by in vivo laser scanning confocal microscopy. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[5]  D. Dartt Dysfunctional neural regulation of lacrimal gland secretion and its role in the pathogenesis of dry eye syndromes. , 2004, The ocular surface.

[6]  A J Bron,et al.  Functional aspects of the tear film lipid layer. , 2004, Experimental eye research.

[7]  Nathan Efron,et al.  Corneal nerve tortuosity in diabetic patients with neuropathy. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[8]  R. Dana,et al.  Assessment of visual function after corneal transplantation: the quality of life and psychometric assessment after corneal transplantation (Q-PACT) study. , 2003, American journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  F. Kruse,et al.  Corneal nerves: structure, contents and function. , 2003, Experimental eye research.

[10]  C. McGhee,et al.  Assessing the sub‐basal nerve plexus of the living healthy human cornea by in vivo confocal microscopy , 2002, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[11]  K. Tsubota,et al.  Dry eye after refractive surgery , 2001, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[12]  N Efron,et al.  Morphology of Corneal Nerves Using Confocal Microscopy , 2001, Cornea.

[13]  J. Alió,et al.  Corneal sensitivity and some properties of the tear film after laser in situ keratomileusis. , 2001, Journal of refractive surgery.

[14]  J. B. Lee,et al.  Comparison of tear secretion and tear film instability after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis , 2000, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[15]  S. Wilson Corneal sensitivity after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis for low myopia. , 1999, Journal of refractive surgery.

[16]  J. Lawrenson,et al.  Reliability of the Non‐Contact Corneal Aesthesiometer and its comparison with the Cochet–Bonnet aesthesiometer , 1998, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[17]  G F Vrensen,et al.  Architecture of human corneal nerves. , 1997, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[18]  R. Guthoff,et al.  Corneal reinnervation following penetrating keratoplasty--correlation of esthesiometry and confocal microscopy. , 1996, German journal of ophthalmology.

[19]  J. Marshall,et al.  A new non-contact corneal aesthesiometer (NCCA). , 1996, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[20]  R. Brancato,et al.  Corneal nerve damage and regeneration after excimer laser photokeratectomy in rabbit eyes. , 1994, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[21]  J. Jester,et al.  Return of human corneal sensitivity after penetrating keratoplasty. , 1988, Archives of ophthalmology.

[22]  A. Safran,et al.  Corneal hypoesthesia. , 1988, Survey of ophthalmology.

[23]  M. Böhnke,et al.  [Development of corneal sensitivity following keratoplasty]. , 1987, Fortschritte der Ophthalmologie : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft.

[24]  B. Holden,et al.  Histochemical evidence of limited reinnervation of human corneal grafts , 1985, Acta ophthalmologica.

[25]  M. Ruben,et al.  Keratoplasty sensitivity. , 1979, The British journal of ophthalmology.