Robust vibration serviceability assessment of footbridges subjected to pedestrian excitation: strategy and applications

Abstract The present paper proposes a strategy for the robust vibration serviceability assessment of footbridges. The response of the footbridge to vertical walking loading is predicted by simulating continuous flows of pedestrians on the structure. In the calculations, both variability in the walking characteristics and human-structure interaction effects are accounted for. Uncertainty in the modal parameters of the footbridge is considered in a multi-interval approach. The resulting range in predicted response levels is subsequently compared to vibration comfort criteria. A case study serves as illustration of the procedure. First, the response of the footbridge is evaluated in a multi-interval assessment showing how the predicted vibration levels are affected by uncertainties. The multi-interval approach allows understanding how uncertainties in the modal parameters of the structure affects the response. Second, the procedure is applied for the design of Tuned Mass Dampers (TMD). The TMD parameters are tuned by solving an optimisation problem such that an effective reduction of the accelerations under realistic walking scenarios is ensured. The total TMD mass is minimised, considered as the determining factor for the cost of the TMD. A higher TMD mass is needed to satisfy the vibration serviceability constraints for higher levels of uncertainty, showing the trade-off between cost and robustness.

[1]  Álvaro Cunha,et al.  Structural health monitoring of a stress-ribbon footbridge , 2013 .

[2]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  Numerical and experimental evaluation of the dynamic performance of a footbridge with tuned mass dampers , 2016 .

[3]  Stana Živanović,et al.  Benchmark Footbridge for Vibration Serviceability Assessment under the Vertical Component of Pedestrian Load , 2012 .

[4]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  Mathematical models for the apparent masses of standing subjects exposed to vertical whole-body vibration , 2003 .

[5]  Piotr Omenzetter,et al.  A spectral density approach for modelling continuous vertical forces on pedestrian structures due to walking , 2004 .

[6]  Helbing,et al.  Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. , 1995, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[7]  Lubos Buzna,et al.  Self-Organized Pedestrian Crowd Dynamics: Experiments, Simulations, and Design Solutions , 2005, Transp. Sci..

[8]  Federica Tubino,et al.  Equivalent spectral model and maximum dynamic response for the serviceability analysis of footbridges , 2012 .

[9]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  Robust design of a TMD for the vibration serviceability of a footbridge , 2016 .

[10]  E. Agu,et al.  Influence of the random dynamic parameters of the human body on the dynamic characteristics of the coupled system of structure–crowd , 2011 .

[11]  A. Kiureghian Structural Response to Stationary Excitation , 1980 .

[12]  Quanwang Li,et al.  Crowd-induced random vibration of footbridge and vibration control using multiple tuned mass dampers , 2010 .

[13]  Babak Moaveni,et al.  Environmental effects on the identified natural frequencies of the Dowling Hall Footbridge , 2011 .

[14]  Christian Frier,et al.  Sensitivity of Footbridge Vibrations to Stochastic Walking Parameters , 2010 .

[15]  David Moens,et al.  A survey of non-probabilistic uncertainty treatment in finite element analysis , 2005 .

[16]  Alessandro Corbetta,et al.  Modelling framework for dynamic interaction between multiple pedestrians and vertical vibrations of footbridges , 2016 .

[17]  Geert Lombaert,et al.  The impact of vertical human-structure interaction on the response of footbridges to pedestrian excitation , 2017 .

[18]  Luca Bruno,et al.  An interpretative model of the pedestrian fundamental relation , 2007 .

[19]  Francesco Ricciardelli,et al.  Lateral Walking-Induced Forces on Footbridges , 2007 .

[20]  John S. Owen,et al.  Experimental identification of the lateral human–structure interaction mechanism and assessment of the inverted-pendulum biomechanical model , 2014 .

[21]  Federica Tubino,et al.  Serviceability assessment of footbridges in unrestricted pedestrian traffic conditions , 2016 .

[22]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF THE STANDING HUMAN BODY EXPOSED TO VERTICAL VIBRATION: INFLUENCE OF POSTURE AND VIBRATION MAGNITUDE , 1998 .

[23]  André Preumont,et al.  On the peak factor of stationary Gaussian processes , 1985 .

[24]  A G Davenport,et al.  NOTE ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE LARGEST VALUE OF A RANDOM FUNCTION WITH APPLICATION TO GUST LOADING. , 1964 .

[25]  Onur Avci,et al.  Amplitude-Dependent Damping in Vibration Serviceability: Case of a Laboratory Footbridge , 2016 .

[26]  Paul Reynolds,et al.  Vibration serviceability of footbridges under human-induced excitation : a literature review , 2005 .

[27]  Michael Hanss,et al.  Applied Fuzzy Arithmetic: An Introduction with Engineering Applications , 2004 .

[28]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[29]  Kelly A. Salyards,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of the Influence of Human-Structure Interaction for Vibration Serviceability , 2014 .

[30]  Aleksandar Pavic,et al.  Identification of mass–spring–damper model of walking humans , 2016 .

[31]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  Prediction of peak response values of structures with and without TMD subjected to random pedestrian flows , 2016 .

[32]  Geert Lombaert,et al.  Vibration serviceability of footbridges: Evaluation of the current codes of practice , 2014 .

[33]  Colin Christopher Caprani,et al.  Formulation of human-structure interaction system models for vertical vibration , 2016 .

[34]  A. Ruina,et al.  Multiple walking speed-frequency relations are predicted by constrained optimization. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.

[35]  Steen Krenk Dynamic Response to Pedestrian Loads with Statistical Frequency Distribution , 2012 .