Agreement Testing Theorems on Layered Set Systems

We introduce a framework of layered subsets, and give a sufficient condition for when a set system supports an agreement test. Agreement testing is a certain type of property testing that generalizes PCP tests such as the plane vs. plane test. Previous work has shown that high dimensional expansion is useful for agreement tests. We extend these results to more general families of subsets, beyond simplicial complexes. These include – Agreement tests for set systems whose sets are faces of high dimensional expanders. Our new tests apply to all dimensions of complexes both in case of two-sided expansion and in the case of one-sided partite expansion. This improves and extends an earlier work of Dinur and Kaufman (FOCS 2017) and applies to matroids, and potentially many additional complexes. – Agreement tests for set systems whose sets are neighborhoods of vertices in a high dimensional expander. This family resembles the expander neighborhood family used in the gap-amplification proof of the PCP theorem. This set system is quite natural yet does not sit in a simplicial complex, and demonstrates some versatility in our proof technique. – Agreement tests on families of subspaces (also known as the Grassmann poset). This extends the classical low degree agreement tests beyond the setting of low degree polynomials. Our analysis relies on a new random walk on simplicial complexes which we call the “complement random walk” and which may be of independent interest. This random walk generalizes the non-lazy random walk on a graph to higher dimensions, and has significantly better expansion than previously-studied random walks on simplicial complexes.

[1]  Guy Kindler,et al.  Towards a proof of the 2-to-1 games conjecture? , 2018, Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex..

[2]  Tali Kaufman,et al.  High Dimensional Random Walks and Colorful Expansion , 2016, ITCS.

[3]  Irit Dinur,et al.  The PCP theorem by gap amplification , 2006, STOC.

[4]  Omer Reingold,et al.  Assignment testers: towards a combinatorial proof of the PCP-theorem , 2004, 45th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[5]  A. Lubotzky,et al.  RAMANUJAN COMPLEXES OF TYPE Ad , 2007 .

[6]  Alexander Lubotzky,et al.  Mixing Properties and the Chromatic Number of Ramanujan Complexes , 2014, 1407.7700.

[7]  Tali Kaufman,et al.  High Order Random Walks: Beyond Spectral Gap , 2017, APPROX-RANDOM.

[8]  David Steurer,et al.  Direct Product Testing , 2014, 2014 IEEE 29th Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC).

[9]  Nima Anari,et al.  Log-concave polynomials II: high-dimensional walks and an FPRAS for counting bases of a matroid , 2018, STOC.

[10]  Howard Garland,et al.  p-Adic Curvature and the Cohomology of Discrete Subgroups of p-Adic Groups , 1973 .

[11]  Izhar Oppenheim,et al.  Local Spectral Expansion Approach to High Dimensional Expanders Part II: Mixing and Geometrical Overlapping , 2014, Discret. Comput. Geom..

[12]  Subhash Khot,et al.  Pseudorandom Sets in Grassmann Graph Have Near-Perfect Expansion , 2018, 2018 IEEE 59th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS).

[13]  Alexander Lubotzky,et al.  Explicit constructions of Ramanujan complexes of type , 2005, Eur. J. Comb..

[14]  Izhar Oppenheim,et al.  Local Spectral Expansion Approach to High Dimensional Expanders Part I: Descent of Spectral Gaps , 2014, Discret. Comput. Geom..

[15]  Ronitt Rubinfeld,et al.  Robust Characterizations of Polynomials with Applications to Program Testing , 1996, SIAM J. Comput..

[16]  Pravesh Kothari,et al.  Small-Set Expansion in Shortcode Graph and the 2-to-2 Conjecture , 2018, Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex..

[17]  Ran Raz,et al.  A sub-constant error-probability low-degree test, and a sub-constant error-probability PCP characterization of NP , 1997, STOC '97.

[18]  Irit Dinur,et al.  Locally Testing Direct Product in the Low Error Range , 2008, 2008 49th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[19]  Tali Kaufman,et al.  High dimensional expanders and property testing , 2014, ITCS.

[20]  Irit Dinur,et al.  Cube vs. Cube Low Degree Test , 2016, Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex..

[21]  Oded Goldreich,et al.  A Combinatorial Consistency Lemma with Application to Proving the PCP Theorem , 1997, SIAM J. Comput..

[22]  Tali Kaufman,et al.  Bounded degree cosystolic expanders of every dimension , 2015, STOC.

[23]  Irit Dinur,et al.  High Dimensional Expanders Imply Agreement Expanders , 2017, 2017 IEEE 58th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS).

[24]  Irit Dinur,et al.  Exponentially Small Soundness for the Direct Product Z-test , 2017, Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex..

[25]  Madhur Tulsiani,et al.  Approximating Constraint Satisfaction Problems on High-Dimensional Expanders , 2019, 2019 IEEE 60th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS).

[26]  Madhu Sudan,et al.  Improved Low-Degree Testing and its Applications , 1997, STOC '97.

[27]  Alexander Lubotzky,et al.  Ramanujan complexes of typeÃd , 2005 .

[28]  Subhash Khot,et al.  On independent sets, 2-to-2 games, and Grassmann graphs , 2017, Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex..

[29]  Irit Dinur,et al.  Analyzing Boolean functions on the biased hypercube via higher-dimensional agreement tests: [Extended abstract] , 2019, SODA.

[30]  Yotam Dikstein,et al.  Boolean function analysis on high-dimensional expanders , 2018, Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex..

[31]  Avi Wigderson,et al.  New direct-product testers and 2-query PCPs , 2009, STOC '09.