Snap: A time critical decision‐making framework for MOUT simulations

Deliberative reasoning based on the rational analysis of various alternatives often requires too much information and may be too slow in time critical situations. In these situations, humans rely mainly on their intuitions rather than some structured decision‐making processes. An important and challenging problem in Military Operations on Urban Terrain (MOUT) simulations is how to generate realistic tactical behaviors for the non‐player characters (also known as bots), as these bots often need to make quick decisions in time‐critical and uncertain situations. In this paper, we describe our work on Snap, a time critical decision‐making framework for the bots in MOUT simulations. The novel features of Snap include case‐based reasoning (CBR) and thin slicing. CBR is used to make quick decisions by comparing the current situation with past experience cases. Thin slicing is used to model human's ability to quickly form up situation awareness under uncertain and complex situations using key cues from partial information. To assess the effectiveness of Snap, we have integrated it into Twilight City, a virtual environment for MOUT simulations. Experimental results show that Snap is very effective in generating quick decisions during time critical situations for MOUT simulations. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  John E. Laird,et al.  Synthetic Adversaries for Urban Combat Training , 2004, AI Mag..

[2]  John E. Laird,et al.  Variability in Human Behavior Modeling for Military Simulations , 2003 .

[3]  John W. Karagosian.  Streetfighting: The Rifle Platoon in MOUT , 2002 .

[4]  M. Daily,et al.  A review of time critical decision making models and human cognitive processes , 2006, 2006 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[5]  Gary Klein,et al.  Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions , 2017 .

[6]  John R. Ballard.  Fighting for Fallujah: A New Dawn for Iraq , 2006 .

[7]  Barry Smyth,et al.  Retrieval, reuse, revision and retention in case-based reasoning , 2005, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[8]  Suiping Zhou,et al.  Twilight City – A Virtual Environment for Mout , 2008 .

[9]  Andrew N. Marshall,et al.  Gamebots: A 3D Virtual World Test-Bed For Multi-Agent Research , 2001 .

[10]  Van Nederveen,et al.  Science, Strategy and War: The Strategic Theory of John Boyd , 2008 .

[11]  Patricia L. McDermott,et al.  Military Operations in Urban Terrain (MOUT): Decision Making in Action , 2001 .

[12]  C. P. Stacey,et al.  Official History of the Canadian Army in the Second World War , 1956 .

[13]  Sharon Alayne Widmayer.  Schema Theory : An Introduction , 2002 .

[14]  Duane P. Schultz.  Panic in the Military , 1971 .

[15]  Kenneth L. Evans.  What Squad Leaders Want to Know in Battle , 2006 .

[16]  W. Brewer,et al.  Role of schemata in memory for places , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.