Evaluation of Stationary Colposcope and the Gynocular, by the Swede Score Systematic Colposcopic System in VIA Positive Women

Objective This study aimed to evaluate cervical lesions by the Swede coloscopy system, histologic finding, liquid-based cytology, and human papillomavirus (HPV) in women who resulted positive for visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid (VIA) by using a pocket-sized battery-driven colposcope, the Gynocular (Gynius AB, Sweden). Methods This study was a crossover, randomized clinical trial at the colposcopy clinic of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University in Dhaka, Bangladesh, with 540 VIA-positive women. Swede scores were obtained by the Gynocular and stationary colposcope, as well as samples for liquid-based cytology, HPV, and cervical biopsies. The Swede scores were compared against the histologic diagnosis and used as criterion standard. The percentage agreement and the κ statistic for the Gynocular and standard colposcope were also calculated. Results The Gynocular and stationary colposcope showed high agreement in Swede scores with a κ statistic of 0.998, P value of less than 0.0001, and no difference in detecting cervical lesions in biopsy. Biopsy detected cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2+ (CIN2, CIN3, and invasive cancer) in 38 (7%) of the women, whereas liquid-based cytology detected CIN2+ in 13 (2.5%) of the women. Forty-four (8.6%) women who were tested resulted positive for HPV; 20 (3.9%) women had HPV-16, 2 (0.4%) had HPV-18, and 22 (4.3%) had other high-risk HPV. Conclusions Our study showed that few VIA-positive women had CIN2+ lesions or HPV infection. Colposcopy by Swede score identified significantly more CIN2+ lesions than liquid-based cytology and could offer a more accurate screening and selection for immediate treatment of cervical lesions in low-resource settings.

[1]  G. L. La Sala,et al.  Primary Tuberculosis of the Uterine Cervix: Keep It in Mind , 2014, Journal of lower genital tract disease.

[2]  J. Ferlay,et al.  Worldwide burden of gynaecological cancer: the size of the problem. , 2006, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[3]  I. Milsom,et al.  The performance of a new scoring system for colposcopy in detecting high‐grade dysplasia in the uterine cervix , 2005, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[4]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[5]  J. Biswas,et al.  Prevalence of high‐risk human papillomavirus and cervical intraepithelial neoplasias in a previously unscreened population—A pooled analysis from three studies , 2013, International journal of cancer.

[6]  J. Sellors,et al.  Use of an expanded gold standard to estimate the accuracy of colposcopy and visual inspection with acetic acid , 2010, International journal of cancer.

[7]  B. Strander,et al.  The Swede Score: Evaluation of a Scoring System Designed to Improve the Predictive Value of Colposcopy , 2010, Journal of lower genital tract disease.

[8]  A. Nessa,et al.  Screening for cervical neoplasia in Bangladesh using visual inspection with acetic acid , 2010, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[9]  R. Sankaranarayanan,et al.  Accuracy of concurrent visual and cytology screening in detecting cervical cancer precursors in rural India , 2012, International journal of cancer.

[10]  J. T. Cox More questions about the accuracy of colposcopy: what does this mean for cervical cancer prevention? , 2008, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  C. Mahé,et al.  Accuracy of conventional cytology: results from a multicentre screening study in India , 2004, Journal of medical screening.

[12]  American society for colposcopy and cervical pathology. , 1997, Journal of lower genital tract disease.

[13]  H. Fox,et al.  "CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA" , 1982, The Lancet.

[14]  M Arbyn,et al.  Accuracy of colposcopy‐directed punch biopsies: a systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2012, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[15]  S. Pimple,et al.  Evaluation of colposcopy vs cytology as secondary test to triage women found positive on visual inspection test. , 2010, Indian journal of cancer.

[16]  A. Nessa,et al.  Screening for and management of high‐grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in Bangladesh: A cross‐sectional study comparing two protocols , 2013, The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research.

[17]  Jack Cuzick,et al.  Cervical screening by visual inspection, HPV testing, liquid‐based and conventional cytology in Amazonian Peru , 2007, International journal of cancer.

[18]  M. Schiffman,et al.  A Population-Based Study of Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid (VIA) for Cervical Screening in Rural Nigeria , 2013, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[19]  Daniel Altman,et al.  Agreement of Colposcope and Gynocular in Assessment of Cervical Lesions by Swede Score: A Randomized, Crossover Pilot Trial , 2013, Journal of lower genital tract disease.

[20]  M. Schiffman,et al.  American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer , 2012, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[21]  V. Cogliano International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) , 2018, The Grants Register 2019.

[22]  A. Nessa,et al.  Clinical trials of cancer screening in the developing world and their impact on cancer healthcare. , 2011, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.