Mapping sociocultural controversies across digital media platforms: one week of #gamergate on Twitter, YouTube, and Tumblr

ABSTRACT Social media play a prominent role in mediating issues of public concern, not only providing the stage on which public debates play out but also shaping their topics and dynamics. Building on and extending existing approaches to both issue mapping and social media analysis, this article explores ways of accounting for popular media practices and the special case of ‘born digital’ sociocultural controversies. We present a case study of the GamerGate controversy with a particular focus on a spike in activity associated with a 2015 Law and Order: SVU episode about gender-based violence and harassment in games culture that was widely interpreted as being based on events associated with GamerGate. The case highlights the importance and challenges of accounting for the cultural dynamics of digital media within and across platforms.

[1]  N. Marres.  Why Map Issues? On Controversy Analysis as a Digital Method , 2015, Science, technology & human values.

[2]  Cherie Todd.  COMMENTARY: GamerGate and Resistance to the Diversification of Gaming Culture , 2015 .

[3]  S. Livingstone.  Audiences and Publics: When Cultural Engagement Matters for the Public Sphere , 2005 .

[4]  A. Bruns,et al.  Twitter hashtags from ad hoc to calculated publics , 2015 .

[5]  M. Gibbs,et al.  #Funeral and Instagram: death, social media, and platform vernacular , 2015 .

[6]  Zizi Papacharissi.  Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics , 2014 .

[7]  Christian Christensen.  Wave-Riding and Hashtag-Jumping: Twitter, Minority ‘Third Parties’ and the 2012 US Elections , 2013 .

[8]  Adrienne Massanari,et al.  #Gamergate and The Fappening: How Reddit’s algorithm, governance, and culture support toxic technocultures , 2017, New Media Soc..

[9]  Tommaso Venturini,et al.  Building on faults: How to represent controversies with digital methods , 2012, Public understanding of science.

[10]  Nancy Fraser.  Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy , 2016, Public Space Reader.

[11]  Meng Yuan.  A private sphere: democracy in a digital age , 2012 .

[12]  Sonia Livingstone,et al.  On the relation between audiences and publics , 2005 .

[13]  Bernhard Rieder,et al.  Studying Facebook via data extraction: the Netvizz application , 2013, WebSci.

[14]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Chatting through pictures? A classification of images tweeted in one week in the UK and USA , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[15]  N. Marres,et al.  Mapping Controversies with Social Media: The Case for Symmetry , 2015 .

[16]  D. Gaonkar.  Publics and counterpublics , 2002 .

[17]  Susan Bridget McHugh,et al.  The Queen of America Goes to Washington City: Essays on Sex and Citizenship (review) , 1998 .

[18]  K. Foot,et al.  Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society , 2014 .

[19]  N. Marres,et al.  Landscaping climate change: a mapping technique for understanding science and technology debates on the World Wide Web , 2000 .

[20]  Pablo J. Boczkowski,et al.  The Relevance of Algorithms , 2013 .

[21]  Michaela Mueller.  Acting in An Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy , 2011 .

[22]  A. Galloway,et al.  Hashtag as Hybrid Forum: The Case of #agchatoz , 2015 .

[23]  Kevin Driscoll,et al.  Searching and Clustering Methodologies , 2015 .

[24]  R. Rogers,et al.  Issue Mapping for an Ageing Europe , 2015 .