Transcranial stimulation over right inferior frontal gyrus increases the weight given to private information during sequential decision-making

&NA; Decision makers often follow other similarly situated people in making decisions, creating a sequential decision‐making context. Although rational behavior is often to make the same choice as previous decision makers, which can result in an information cascade, people may assign inappropriately higher weight to their own private information and discount public information about predecessors' choices. Recent findings suggest that overweighting private information may be associated with increased activities in the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG). In the present study, we employed transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and developed a computational model to examine the causal relationship between right IFG (rIFG) and overweighting private information. Specifically, we applied three types of tDCS over rIFG while participants were completing a sequential decision‐making task. Our results showed that anodal stimulation significantly increased the weight given to private information and decreased the response time in making a decision when private information conflicted with public information, but cathodal stimulation did not have such impacts. Importantly, the effect of anodal stimulation was significant in some conditions when information conflict or task difficulty reached a threshold that might trigger cognitive control‐related processes. Our findings revealed the important role of rIFG in trade‐off between considering private and public information during sequential decision‐making.

[1]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Individual-level loss aversion in riskless and risky choices , 2022, Theory and Decision.

[2]  Jianbiao Li,et al.  Electrophysiological Precursor of Information Cascade: Evidence from N200 , 2018 .

[3]  S. Morioka,et al.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Temporoparietal Junction and Inferior Frontal Cortex Improves Imitation-Inhibition and Perspective-Taking with no Effect on the Autism-Spectrum Quotient Score , 2017, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[4]  Arndis Simonsen,et al.  Independent Neural Computation of Value from Other People's Confidence , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  T. Zaehle,et al.  Improving Interference Control in ADHD Patients with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) , 2016, Front. Cell. Neurosci..

[6]  G. Galfano,et al.  Assessing the effects of tDCS over a delayed response inhibition task by targeting the right inferior frontal gyrus and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex , 2015, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  Jörg Rieskamp,et al.  Neural correlates of informational cascades: brain mechanisms of social influence on belief updating. , 2015, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[8]  L. Maloney,et al.  Neural Mechanisms for Integrating Prior Knowledge and Likelihood in Value-Based Probabilistic Inference , 2015, Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  Sukhvinder S. Obhi,et al.  Task-dependent and distinct roles of the temporoparietal junction and inferior frontal cortex in the control of imitation , 2014, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[10]  Yong Tan,et al.  Do I Follow My Friends or the Crowd? Information Cascades in Online Movie Ratings , 2014, Manag. Sci..

[11]  C. Miniussi,et al.  A Simultaneous Modulation of Reactive and Proactive Inhibition Processes by Anodal tDCS on the Right Inferior Frontal Cortex , 2014, PloS one.

[12]  Holger Andreas Rau,et al.  The Disposition Effect and Loss Aversion: Do Gender Differences Matter? , 2014 .

[13]  E. Fehr,et al.  Changing Social Norm Compliance with Noninvasive Brain Stimulation , 2013, Science.

[14]  Yufei Ren,et al.  Overconfidence in Newsvendor Orders: An Experimental Study , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[15]  Daniel C. Javitt,et al.  Activation of Inhibition: Diminishing Impulsive Behavior by Direct Current Stimulation over the Inferior Frontal Gyrus , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Speech Facilitation by Left Inferior Frontal Cortex Stimulation , 2011, Current Biology.

[17]  Christopher J. Ellis,et al.  Information Cascades and Revolutionary Regime Transitions , 2011 .

[18]  M. Koslowsky,et al.  tDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: a meta-analytical review , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  John Duncan,et al.  The role of the right inferior frontal gyrus: inhibition and attentional control , 2010, NeuroImage.

[20]  Alessandra Rufa,et al.  Overconfident Behavior In Informational Cascades: An Eye-Tracking Study , 2009 .

[21]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Self-control in decision-making involves modulation of the vmPFC valuation system , 2009, NeuroImage.

[22]  Glenn J. Browne,et al.  Sequential Adoption Theory: A Theory for Understanding Herding Behavior in Early Adoption of Novel Technologies , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Georg Weizsäcker Do We Follow Others When We Should? A Simple Test of Rational Expectations , 2010 .

[24]  L. Cohen,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008 , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[25]  Jonathan R. Folstein,et al.  Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[26]  U. Fischbacher z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments , 1999 .

[27]  Sabrina M. Tom,et al.  The Neural Basis of Loss Aversion in Decision-Making Under Risk , 2007, Science.

[28]  A. Rubinstein Instinctive and Cognitive Reasoning: A Study of Response Times , 2006 .

[29]  S. Frederick Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 19, Number 4—Fall 2005—Pages 25–42 Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making , 2022 .

[30]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Neural Circuits Underlying Imitation Learning of Hand Actions An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2004, Neuron.

[31]  Jacob K. Goeree,et al.  Self-Correcting Information Cascades , 2004 .

[32]  T. Robbins,et al.  Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. , 2004, Psychological review.

[34]  Yuping Wang,et al.  The sequential processing of visual feature conjunction mismatches in the human brain. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[35]  John D. E. Gabrieli,et al.  Material-dependent and material-independent selection processes in the frontal and parietal lobes: an event-related fMRI investigation of response competition , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects , 2002 .

[37]  Dorothea Kübler,et al.  Limited Depth of Reasoning and Failure of Cascade Formation in the Laboratory , 2001 .

[38]  Martin Weber,et al.  Information Aggregation with Random Ordering: Cascades and Overconfidence , 2003 .

[39]  J. Cohen,et al.  Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. , 2000, Science.

[40]  Joerg Oechssler,et al.  Informational cascades in the laboratory: Do they occur for the right reasons? , 2000 .

[41]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  Information Cascades in the Laboratory , 1998 .

[42]  A. Banerjee,et al.  A Simple Model of Herd Behavior , 1992 .

[43]  S. Bikhchandani,et al.  You have printed the following article : A Theory of Fads , Fashion , Custom , and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades , 2007 .

[44]  G. Logan On the ability to inhibit thought and action , 1984 .

[45]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .