An Examination of Lag Effects in Relationships between Information Technology Investment and Firm-Level Performance

We focus on two issues that have hinder ed understanding of the IT investment - firm performance relationship: the variety of firm performance measures used and the existence of a time -lag for performance effects. We develop t heoretical a rguments concerning the nature of different classes of performance measures and the ir abilit ies to capture the effects of IT investment initiatives as well as the nature of the lag effect for different types of IT investments. Our empirical findings gener ally confirm our theoretical arguments. Automate IT investments demonstrate the most evident impacts on firm performance as they were observed for three categories of firm performance: Production costs , profitability, and market valuation . Transform IT i nvestments performance impacts are most evident with profitability. Secon dly, our findings provide mixed evidence regarding the nature of the l ag between the time of an IT investment and its influence on firm performance. Specifically, for accounting -bas ed performance metrics, transform IT investments exhibit a longer time -lag than automate IT investments ; for market -based performance metrics, the reverse was observed. Finally , it appears that informate IT investment s may be the most challenging type of IT investment to link to firm performance.

[1]  Wonseok Oh,et al.  On the Assessment of the Strategic Value of Information Technologies: Conceptual and Analytical Approaches , 2007, MIS Q..

[2]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Value Implications of Investments in Information Technology , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[3]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Advanced Business Intelligence at Cardinal Health , 2005, MIS Q. Executive.

[4]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Managing Online in Perpetual Perfect Storms: Insights from IndyMac Bank , 2005, MIS Q. Executive.

[5]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[6]  Vernon J. Richardson,et al.  The Value Relevance of Announcements of Transformational Information Technology Investments , 2003, MIS Q..

[7]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Information technology and economic performance , 2003, ACM Comput. Surv..

[8]  Radhika Santhanam,et al.  Issues in Linking Information Technology Capability to Firm Performance , 2003, MIS Q..

[9]  Vernon J. Richardson,et al.  Returns on Investments in Information Technology: A Research Synthesis , 2002, J. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Intangible Assets: Computers and Organizational Capital , 2002 .

[11]  Edward J. Zajac,et al.  Decoupling Policy from Practice: The Case of Stock Repurchase Programs , 2001 .

[12]  Vernon J. Richardson,et al.  Examining the Shareholder Wealth Effects of Announcements of Newly Created CIO Positions , 2001, MIS Q..

[13]  Varun Grover,et al.  Research Report: A Reexamination of IT Investment and the Market Value of the Firm - An Event Study Methodology , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[14]  David W. Stewart,et al.  Signaling Strategies in Competitive Interaction: Building Reputations and Hiding the Truth , 2001 .

[15]  D. Jorgenson.  Information Technology and the U.S. Economy , 2001 .

[16]  Barbara Bigelow,et al.  Presenting Structural Innovation in an Institutional Environment: Hospitals' Use of Impression Management , 2000 .

[17]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Information Technology Payoff in the Health-Care Industry: A Longitudinal Study , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Anandhi S. Bharadwaj,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation , 2000, MIS Q..

[19]  Sundar G. Bharadwaj,et al.  Information Technology Effects on Firm Performance as Measured by Tobin's q , 1999 .

[20]  V. Sambamurthy,et al.  Information Technology Assimilation in Firms: The Influence of Senior Leadership and IT Infrastructures , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[21]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  Beyond the productivity paradox , 1998, CACM.

[22]  Chung-ki Min,et al.  The substitution of information technology for other factors of production: a Firm Level Analysis , 1997 .

[23]  Mike Adams,et al.  Ritualism, opportunism and corporate disclosure in the New Zealand life insurance industry: field evidence , 1997 .

[24]  Edgar Brunner,et al.  A unified approach to rank tests for mixed models , 1997 .

[25]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  Productivity, Business Profitability, and Consumer Surplus: Three Different Measures of Information Technology Value , 1996, MIS Q..

[26]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Paradox Lost? Firm-Level Evidence on the Returns to Information Systems Spending , 1996 .

[27]  Vijay Gurbaxani,et al.  A process oriented framework for assessing the business value of information technology , 1995, DATB.

[28]  Kimberly D. Elsbach.  MANAGING ORGANIZATIONAL LEGITIMACY IN THE CALIFORNIA CATTLE INDUSTRY - THE CONSTRUCTION AND EFFECTIVENESS OF VERBAL ACCOUNTS , 1994 .

[29]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  The productivity paradox of information technology , 1993, CACM.

[30]  Ken Peffers,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology Investment Announcements on the Market Value of the Firm , 1993, Inf. Syst. Res..

[31]  Peter Weill,et al.  The Relationship Between Investment in Information Technology and Firm Performance: A Study of the Valve Manufacturing Sector , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[32]  Baruch Lev,et al.  Information Disclosure Strategy , 1992 .

[33]  T. S. Robertson,et al.  Toward a theory of competitive market signaling: A research agenda , 1991 .

[34]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[35]  Blake Ives,et al.  Executive Involvement and Participation in the Management of Information Technology , 1991, MIS Q..

[36]  Blake Ives,et al.  Information Technology and Corporate Strategy: A View from the Top , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[37]  Paul A. Strassmann,et al.  The Business Value of Computers: An Executive's Guide , 1990 .

[38]  Shoshana Zuboff,et al.  Of Mice and Managers@@@In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power , 1992 .

[39]  Steven N. Kaplan,et al.  The effects of management buyouts on operating performance and value , 1989 .

[40]  J. Meindl,et al.  Corporate attributions as strategic illusions of management control. , 1984 .

[41]  Barton A. Weitz,et al.  Attributions in the Board Room: Causal Reasoning in Corporate Annual Reports , 1983 .

[42]  J. Pfeffer.  Management as symbolic action: the creation and maintenance of organizational paradigms , 1981 .

[43]  E. H. Bowman.  Strategy, Annual Reports, and Alchemy , 1978 .

[44]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[45]  N. Denzin.  The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods , 1977 .

[46]  J. Kimberly.  Organizational size and the structuralist perspective: a review, critique, and proposal , 1976 .

[47]  E. Schein.  The role of the CEO in the management of change : the case of information technology , 1975 .

[48]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .