International spillovers and absorptive capacity: A cross-country cross-sector analysis based on patents and citations

This paper provides an empirical assessment of the effect of national and international knowledge spillovers on innovation at a finely defined sectoral level for six major industrialised countries over the period 1981-1995. International spillovers are always found to be effective in increasing innovative productivity. The paper then uses self-citations to investigate the role of prior R&D experience in enhancing a country?s ability to understand and improve upon external knowledge (absorptive capacity). The empirical results show that absorptive capacity increases the elasticity of a country?s innovation to both national and international spillovers. The larger the gap of a country with the technological leaders, the weaker is this effect, but the larger is the country?s potential to increase it.

[1]  Wolfgang Keller,et al.  Are international R&D spillovers trade-related?: Analyzing spillovers among randomly matched trade partners , 1998 .

[2]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Patents and R&D: is There a Lag? , 1984 .

[3]  P. Allison,et al.  7. Fixed-Effects Negative Binomial Regression Models , 2002 .

[4]  Rainer Frietsch,et al.  Linking Technology Areas to Industrial Sectors , 2003 .

[5]  Jacques Mairesse,et al.  Exploring the Relationship between R&D and Productivity in French Manufacturing Firms , 1992 .

[6]  A. Pakes,et al.  Patents and R&D at the Firm Level: A First Look , 1984 .

[7]  G. Peri Knowledge Flows, R&D Spillovers and Innovation , 2003 .

[8]  Megan MacGarvie,et al.  How well do patent citations measure flows of technology? Evidence from French innovation surveys , 2005 .

[9]  J. Bernstein,et al.  Research and Development and Intraindustry Spillovers: an Empirical Application of Dynamic Duality , 1986 .

[10]  Richard Blundell,et al.  Individual effects and dynamics in count data models , 2002 .

[11]  Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  International R&D spillovers: A comment , 1998 .

[12]  L. Bottazzi,et al.  Innovation and Spillovers in Regions: Evidence from European Patent Data , 2002 .

[13]  Danny Quah,et al.  Empirics for Growth and Distribution: Stratification, Polarization, and Convergence Clubs , 1997 .

[14]  Brent R. Moulton Random group effects and the precision of regression estimates , 1986 .

[15]  Céline Nauges,et al.  Unit Roots: Identification and Testing in Micro Panels , 2005 .

[16]  Jonathan Eaton,et al.  International Technology Diffusion: Theory and Measurement , 1999 .

[17]  L. Bottazzi,et al.  The Dynamics of R&D and Innovation in the Short-Run and in the Long-Run , 2004 .

[18]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  Identifying Technology Spillovers and Product Market Rivalry , 2005 .

[19]  Jacques Michel,et al.  Patent citation analysis.A closer look at the basic input data from patent search reports , 2001, Scientometrics.

[20]  Lee G. Branstetter Are knowledge spillovers international or intranational in scope? ☆: Microeconometric evidence from the U.S. and Japan , 2001 .

[21]  Z. Griliches R&D and Productivity: The Unfinished Business , 1998 .

[22]  Jonathan Eaton,et al.  Trade in Ideas: Patenting and Productivity in the OECD , 1995 .

[23]  G. Grossman,et al.  Innovation and growth in the global economy , 1993 .

[24]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship , 1984 .

[25]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[26]  Pravin K. Trivedi,et al.  Regression Analysis of Count Data , 1998 .

[27]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  Patents, Citations and Innovations , 2002 .

[28]  J. V. Reenen,et al.  The Profitability of Innovating Firms , 1993 .

[29]  R. Blundell,et al.  Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms , 1999 .

[30]  Z. Griliches The Search for R&D Spillovers , 1991 .

[31]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  R&D and Productivity: The Unfinished Business , 1998 .

[32]  Giovanni Peri,et al.  The International Dynamics of R&D and Innovation in the Long Run and in the Short Run , 2007 .

[33]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  Knowledge Spillovers in Europe: A Patent Citations Analysis , 2002 .

[34]  R. Griffith,et al.  Technology Sourcing: An Empirical Analysis Using Firm-Level Patent Data , 2004 .

[35]  R. Winkelmann Econometric Analysis of Count Data , 1997 .

[36]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Patents and R and D at the Firm Level: A First Look , 1980 .

[37]  Rainer Frietsch,et al.  Linking Technology Areas to Industrial Sectors Final Report to the European Commission, DG Research , 2003 .

[38]  Bruno Crépon,et al.  estimating the innovation function from patent numbers: gmm on count panel data ¤ , 1997 .

[39]  Stephen J. Redding,et al.  Mapping The Two Faces Of R&D: Productivity Growth In A Panel Of OECD Industries , 2000 .

[40]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth , 1979 .

[41]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  How Rapidly Does New Industrial Technology Leak Out , 1985 .

[42]  Z. Griliches Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[43]  Stephen J. Redding,et al.  Evolving patterns of international trade , 2000 .

[44]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[45]  A. Jaffe Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms&Apos; Patents, Profits and Market Value , 1986 .

[46]  Giovanni Peri,et al.  Determinants of Knowledge Flows and Their Effect on Innovation , 2005, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[47]  Michele Cincera,et al.  International R&D spillovers: a survey , 2001 .