A generalized framework for computational design and mutational scanning of T-cell receptor binding interfaces.

T-cell receptors (TCRs) have emerged as a new class of therapeutics, most prominently for cancer where they are the key components of new cellular therapies as well as soluble biologics. Many studies have generated high affinity TCRs in order to enhance sensitivity. Recent outcomes, however, have suggested that fine manipulation of TCR binding, with an emphasis on specificity may be more valuable than large affinity increments. Structure-guided design is ideally suited for this role, and here we studied the generality of structure-guided design as applied to TCRs. We found that a previous approach, which successfully optimized the binding of a therapeutic TCR, had poor accuracy when applied to a broader set of TCR interfaces. We thus sought to develop a more general purpose TCR design framework. After assembling a large dataset of experimental data spanning multiple interfaces, we trained a new scoring function that accounted for unique features of each interface. Together with other improvements, such as explicit inclusion of molecular flexibility, this permitted the design new affinity-enhancing mutations in multiple TCRs, including those not used in training. Our approach also captured the impacts of mutations and substitutions in the peptide/MHC ligand, and recapitulated recent findings regarding TCR specificity, indicating utility in more general mutational scanning of TCR-pMHC interfaces.

[1]  B. Corthésy,et al.  Multi-Faceted Functions of Secretory IgA at Mucosal Surfaces , 2013, Front. Immunol..

[2]  Steven A. Rosenberg,et al.  Adoptive immunotherapy for cancer: harnessing the T cell response , 2012, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[3]  R. R. Hocking The analysis and selection of variables in linear regression , 1976 .

[4]  S. Rosenberg,et al.  Gene therapy with human and mouse T-cell receptors mediates cancer regression and targets normal tissues expressing cognate antigen. , 2009, Blood.

[5]  Duncan Poole,et al.  Routine Microsecond Molecular Dynamics Simulations with AMBER on GPUs. 1. Generalized Born , 2012, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[6]  Shohei Koide,et al.  The importance of being tyrosine: lessons in molecular recognition from minimalist synthetic binding proteins. , 2009, ACS chemical biology.

[7]  Kurt H Piepenbrink,et al.  T cell receptor cross-reactivity directed by antigen-dependent tuning of peptide-MHC molecular flexibility. , 2009, Immunity.

[8]  Brian M. Baker,et al.  Conformational changes and flexibility in T-cell receptor recognition of peptide–MHC complexes , 2008, The Biochemical journal.

[9]  D. Baker,et al.  Computational design of a protein-based enzyme inhibitor. , 2013, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  B. Baker,et al.  Disparate degrees of hypervariable loop flexibility control T-cell receptor cross-reactivity, specificity, and binding mechanism. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  Rafael Brüschweiler,et al.  General framework for studying the dynamics of folded and nonfolded proteins by NMR relaxation spectroscopy and MD simulation. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[12]  J. Slansky,et al.  Mobilizing the low-avidity T cell repertoire to kill tumors. , 2007, Seminars in cancer biology.

[13]  Samuel L. DeLuca,et al.  Practically Useful: What the Rosetta Protein Modeling Suite Can Do for You , 2010, Biochemistry.

[14]  Cory M. Ayres,et al.  Differential utilization of binding loop flexibility in T cell receptor ligand selection and cross-reactivity , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[15]  Sri Krishna,et al.  TCR contact residue hydrophobicity is a hallmark of immunogenic CD8+ T cell epitopes , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Tongguang Wang,et al.  Cancer Regression and Neurological Toxicity Following Anti-MAGE-A3 TCR Gene Therapy , 2013, Journal of immunotherapy.

[17]  Huynh-Hoa Bui,et al.  WATGEN: An algorithm for modeling water networks at protein–protein interfaces , 2007, J. Comput. Chem..

[18]  David Baker,et al.  PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 58:893–904 (2005) A “Solvated Rotamer ” Approach to Modeling Water- Mediated Hydrogen Bonds at Protein–Protein Interfaces , 2022 .

[19]  B. Baker,et al.  Engineering the binding properties of the T cell receptor:peptide:MHC ternary complex that governs T cell activity. , 2009, Molecular immunology.

[20]  J. Mccammon,et al.  Accounting for Receptor Flexibility and Enhanced Sampling Methods in Computer‐Aided Drug Design , 2013, Chemical biology & drug design.

[21]  Daniel R Roe,et al.  PTRAJ and CPPTRAJ: Software for Processing and Analysis of Molecular Dynamics Trajectory Data. , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[22]  D. Baker,et al.  A simple physical model for binding energy hot spots in protein–protein complexes , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Benjamin A. Shoemaker,et al.  Speeding molecular recognition by using the folding funnel: the fly-casting mechanism. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Yi Li,et al.  High-Affinity TCRs Generated by Phage Display Provide CD4+ T Cells with the Ability to Recognize and Kill Tumor Cell Lines1 , 2007, The Journal of Immunology.

[25]  Andrew K. Sewell,et al.  Hydrophobic CDR3 residues promote the development of self-reactive T cells , 2016, Nature Immunology.

[26]  Yi Li,et al.  Directed evolution of human T-cell receptors with picomolar affinities by phage display , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[27]  B. Baker,et al.  Structural and dynamic control of T‐cell receptor specificity, cross‐reactivity, and binding mechanism , 2012, Immunological reviews.

[28]  S. Fields,et al.  Deep mutational scanning: a new style of protein science , 2014, Nature Methods.

[29]  H. Bosshard,et al.  Protein stabilization by salt bridges: concepts, experimental approaches and clarification of some misunderstandings , 2004, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[30]  Pinak Chakrabarti,et al.  Hydration of protein–protein interfaces , 2005, Proteins.

[31]  L. K. Ely,et al.  The CDR3 regions of an immunodominant T cell receptor dictate the 'energetic landscape' of peptide-MHC recognition , 2005, Nature Immunology.

[32]  Sylvain Arlot,et al.  A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection , 2009, 0907.4728.

[33]  Adrian A Canutescu,et al.  Cyclic coordinate descent: A robotics algorithm for protein loop closure , 2003, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[34]  Duncan Poole,et al.  Routine Microsecond Molecular Dynamics Simulations with AMBER on GPUs. 2. Explicit Solvent Particle Mesh Ewald. , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[35]  J. Mccammon,et al.  Exploring the role of receptor flexibility in structure-based drug discovery. , 2014, Biophysical chemistry.

[36]  David Baker,et al.  Macromolecular modeling with rosetta. , 2008, Annual review of biochemistry.

[37]  B. Tidor,et al.  Do salt bridges stabilize proteins? A continuum electrostatic analysis , 1994, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[38]  Chris de Graaf,et al.  Binding mode prediction of cytochrome p450 and thymidine kinase protein-ligand complexes by consideration of water and rescoring in automated docking. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[39]  K D Wittrup,et al.  In vitro evolution of a T cell receptor with high affinity for peptide/MHC. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  Brian M Baker,et al.  Two different T cell receptors use different thermodynamic strategies to recognize the same peptide/MHC ligand. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[41]  B. Jakobsen,et al.  ImmTACs: Novel bi-specific agents for targeted cancer therapy. , 2013, Oncoimmunology.

[42]  B. Baker,et al.  TCRs Used in Cancer Gene Therapy Cross-React with MART-1/Melan-A Tumor Antigens via Distinct Mechanisms , 2011, The Journal of Immunology.

[43]  Cyril F. Reboul,et al.  Epitope Flexibility and Dynamic Footprint Revealed by Molecular Dynamics of a pMHC-TCR Complex , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[44]  M. Karplus,et al.  Effective energy function for proteins in solution , 1999, Proteins.

[45]  P. Bradley,et al.  Toward High-Resolution de Novo Structure Prediction for Small Proteins , 2005, Science.

[46]  Sergey Lyskov,et al.  PyRosetta: a script-based interface for implementing molecular modeling algorithms using Rosetta , 2010, Bioinform..

[47]  N. Singh,et al.  An Engineered Switch in T Cell Receptor Specificity Leads to an Unusual but Functional Binding Geometry. , 2016, Structure.

[48]  B. Baker,et al.  Limitations of time-resolved fluorescence suggested by molecular simulations: assessing the dynamics of T cell receptor binding loops. , 2012, Biophysical journal.

[49]  Genshiro Kitagawa,et al.  Selected papers of Hirotugu Akaike , 1998 .

[50]  B Rotenberg,et al.  Highly confined ions store charge more efficiently in supercapacitors , 2013, Nature Communications.

[51]  Zhiping Weng,et al.  Prediction of protein–protein binding free energies , 2012, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[52]  K. M. Armstrong,et al.  Fluorine substitutions in an antigenic peptide selectively modulate T-cell receptor binding in a minimally perturbing manner. , 2009, The Biochemical journal.

[53]  Brian M Baker,et al.  T cell receptor binding transition states and recognition of peptide/MHC. , 2007, Biochemistry.

[54]  Julie C. Mitchell,et al.  Community‐wide evaluation of methods for predicting the effect of mutations on protein–protein interactions , 2013, Proteins.

[55]  Jack Snoeyink,et al.  Scientific benchmarks for guiding macromolecular energy function improvement. , 2013, Methods in enzymology.

[56]  Zhiping Weng,et al.  How structural adaptability exists alongside HLA-A2 bias in the human αβ TCR repertoire , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  M. Merino,et al.  T Cells Targeting Carcinoembryonic Antigen Can Mediate Regression of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer but Induce Severe Transient Colitis. , 2011, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[58]  D. Baker,et al.  Role of conformational sampling in computing mutation‐induced changes in protein structure and stability , 2011, Proteins.

[59]  J. Janin,et al.  Wet and dry interfaces: the role of solvent in protein-protein and protein-DNA recognition. , 1999, Structure.

[60]  Zhiping Weng,et al.  Structure‐based design of a T‐cell receptor leads to nearly 100‐fold improvement in binding affinity for pepMHC , 2009, Proteins.

[61]  Zhiping Weng,et al.  Computational Design of the Affinity and Specificity of a Therapeutic T Cell Receptor , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[62]  Ross C. Walker,et al.  An overview of the Amber biomolecular simulation package , 2013 .

[63]  Timothy A. Whitehead,et al.  Optimization of affinity, specificity and function of designed influenza inhibitors using deep sequencing , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[64]  G. Schreiber,et al.  Assessing computational methods for predicting protein stability upon mutation: good on average but not in the details. , 2009, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[65]  R. Zinkernagel,et al.  Immunological surveillance against altered self components by sensitised T lymphocytes in lymphocytes choriomeningitis , 1974, Nature.

[66]  Moushumi Hossain,et al.  Loss of T Cell Antigen Recognition Arising from Changes in Peptide and Major Histocompatibility Complex Protein Flexibility , 2011, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[67]  Kengo Kinoshita,et al.  Community-wide assessment of protein-interface modeling suggests improvements to design methodology. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[68]  Adam Bagg,et al.  Cardiovascular toxicity and titin cross-reactivity of affinity-enhanced T cells in myeloma and melanoma. , 2013, Blood.

[69]  Zhiping Weng,et al.  Backbone flexibility of CDR3 and immune recognition of antigens. , 2014, Journal of molecular biology.

[70]  Timothy Cardozo,et al.  Specific Increase in Potency via Structure-Based Design of a TCR , 2014, The Journal of Immunology.

[71]  D. Mason,et al.  A very high level of crossreactivity is an essential feature of the T-cell receptor. , 1998, Immunology today.

[72]  B. Kuhlman,et al.  A comparison of successful and failed protein interface designs highlights the challenges of designing buried hydrogen bonds , 2013, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[73]  David M. Kranz,et al.  Structural interplay between germline and adaptive recognition determines TCR-peptide-MHC cross-reactivity , 2015, Nature Immunology.

[74]  James McCluskey,et al.  T cell antigen receptor recognition of antigen-presenting molecules. , 2015, Annual review of immunology.

[75]  R. Phillips,et al.  Control of HIV-1 immune escape by CD8 T cells expressing enhanced T-cell receptor , 2008, Nature Medicine.

[76]  D. Wiley,et al.  Two human T cell receptors bind in a similar diagonal mode to the HLA-A2/Tax peptide complex using different TCR amino acids. , 1998, Immunity.

[77]  Philippe Derreumaux,et al.  Flexibility and binding affinity in protein–ligand, protein–protein and multi-component protein interactions: limitations of current computational approaches , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.