Effects of Noise on the Information Content of Remote Sensing Images

Abstract Remote sensing images are used to estimate certain geophysical parameters or detect the presence or extent of geophysical phenomena. The amount of information extracted from remotely sensed data is dependent upon the type of sensor, the portion of the electromagnetic spectrum used, the quality of the data recorded, and certain physical limitations. There are other limiting factors involved in processing the data once they have been collected. In addition to noise added inherently by the sensor, image processing techniques also corrupt the image with noise in varying degrees. One of the measures to quantify information content is classification accuracy. Although the image information content reduces as the image is corrupted with noise, in certain applications there may not be as great a loss as one might expect. This can be attributed to the fact that although the value of a pixel may change as a result of corruption due to noise, the same pixel may in most cases, be correctly classified. Our research reveals that this loss in information is exponentially related to the variance of the added noise. The model is seen to be applicable for Landsat TM as well as multi‐look and single‐look SIR‐C imagery. We observe that the relationship is independent of the type of noise (Gaussian, Gamma, or exponential). However, the rate of information loss increases with increasing correlation distance in the case of spatially correlated noise. The rate of information loss also increases with the number of classes chosen for classifying the scene. Using our mathematical model for information content as a function of noise variance, one can specify an “allowable” signal‐to‐noise ratio for a specific application.

[1]  T. M. Lillesand,et al.  Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation , 1980 .

[2]  Richard Moore Tradeoff between Picture Element Dimensions and Noncoherent Averaging in Side-Looking Airborne Radar , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[3]  V.S. Frost,et al.  The Information Content of Synthetic Aperture Radar Images of Terrain , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[4]  J. C. Price,et al.  Comparison of the Information Content of Data from the LANDSAT-4 Thematic Mapper And the Multispectral Scanner , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  M Fuderer,et al.  The information content of MR images. , 1988, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[6]  Y. Sinitsyn,et al.  Information content of radar remote sensing systems of earth from space , 1989 .

[7]  I. J. Dowman,et al.  Information content of high resolution satellite imagery , 1989 .

[8]  F. O. Huck,et al.  An information theory of image gathering , 1991, Inf. Sci..

[9]  D. Blacknell,et al.  Information content of coherent images , 1993 .

[10]  R.M. Narayanan,et al.  Statistical characteristics of simulated radar imagery from bare soil surfaces: effects of surface roughness and soil moisture variability , 1994, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[11]  Joseph A. O'Sullivan,et al.  Information-Theoretic Image Formation , 1998, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[12]  Rick S. Blum,et al.  On estimating the quality of noisy images , 1998, Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, ICASSP '98 (Cat. No.98CH36181).

[13]  Ram M. Narayanan,et al.  Characterization of information content in remote sensing imagery , 1998, IGARSS '98. Sensing and Managing the Environment. 1998 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing. Symposium Proceedings. (Cat. No.98CH36174).

[14]  Ram M. Narayanan,et al.  Effect of gray-scale resolution on information content of remote sensing imagery , 1999, Optics & Photonics.

[15]  Steven W. McLaughlin,et al.  InformationTheoretic Image Formation , 2000 .

[16]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Land cover classification from hyperspectral remotely sensed data: an investigation of spectral, spatial and noise issues , 2001, IGARSS 2001. Scanning the Present and Resolving the Future. Proceedings. IEEE 2001 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (Cat. No.01CH37217).

[17]  Ronald G. Driggers,et al.  Surveillance and Reconnaissance Imaging Systems: Modeling and Performance Prediction , 2001 .