Bus Following Model: A Case Study in Edinburgh

A number of car following models have been developed and calibrated for the purpose of understanding and simulating the behaviour of driving under various traffic and transportation management systems. Such studies are useful for safety impact studies, network analysis and capacity analysis. However bus following is a special behaviour, which impacts on other traffic especially in the absence of dedicated bus lanes. This paper reports on a study in the City of Edinburgh which was undertaken to investigate and understand the behaviour of buses in the city. A commuter bus equipped with a data logging device was followed by an instrumented vehicle to collect data to study bus following behaviour. A model of distance difference as a function of the acceleration/deceleration, speed and speed difference has been developed for bus following behaviour. The GHR model was used to investigate and calibrate the parameters of the model of the car following a bus. The study findings show that the speed and acceleration of the following vehicle are influenced by the leading commuter bus in both acceleration and deceleration regimes. The results also show that a car following a bus behaves differently to a car following a car. This is because of the limited visibility, huge delays for buses on the corridor and the different driving characteristics of the bus with respect to the car.

[1]  Said M. Easa,et al.  Development of New and Improved Driver-sensitive Car-following Model , 2010 .

[2]  E. Montroll,et al.  Traffic Dynamics: Studies in Car Following , 1958 .

[3]  Mike McDonald,et al.  Car-following: a historical review , 1999 .

[4]  T. Ranney Psychological factors that influence car-following and car-following model development , 1999 .

[5]  Kyung-Soo Chon,et al.  A car-following model applied reaction times distribution and perceptual threshold , 2005 .

[6]  T. Kim Understanding and Modeling Driver Behavior in Dense Traffic Flow , 2002 .

[7]  A. May,et al.  NON-INTEGER CAR-FOLLOWING MODELS , 1967 .

[8]  L. C. Edie Car-Following and Steady-State Theory for Noncongested Traffic , 1961 .

[9]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Empirical Analysis of Two-Leader Car-Following Behavior , 2006 .

[10]  D. Gazis,et al.  Nonlinear Follow-the-Leader Models of Traffic Flow , 1961 .

[11]  Edward Chung,et al.  Evaluation of the GHR car following model for traffic safety studies , 2012 .

[12]  H. Greenberg An Analysis of Traffic Flow , 1959 .

[13]  P. G. Gipps,et al.  A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation , 1981 .

[14]  Prakash Ranjitkar,et al.  CAR-FOLLOWING MODELS: AN EXPERIMENT BASED BENCHMARKING , 2005 .

[15]  H Ozaki,et al.  REACTION AND ANTICIPATION IN THE CAR-FOLLOWING BEHAVIOR. , 1993 .

[16]  Taehyung Kim,et al.  Analysis of Variability in Car-Following Behavior Over Long-Term Driving Maneuvers , 2005 .

[17]  Dihua Sun,et al.  Microscopic car-following model for the traffic flow: the state of the art , 2012 .

[18]  Hussein Dia,et al.  Comparative evaluation of microscopic car-following behavior , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[19]  J Treiterer,et al.  THE HYSTERESIS PHENOMENON IN TRAFFIC FLOW , 1974 .

[20]  Mike McDonald,et al.  Motorway driver behaviour: studies on car following , 2002 .

[21]  Gordon F. Newell,et al.  A THEORY OF PLATOON FORMATION IN TUNNEL TRAFFIC , 1959 .