Radiotherapy planning of the pelvis using distortion corrected MR images: the removal of system distortions.

Image distortion is an important consideration in the use of magnetic resonance (MR) images for radiotherapy planning. The distortion is a consequence of system distortion (arising from main magnetic field inhomogeneity and nonlinearities in the applied magnetic field gradients) and of effects arising from the object/patient being imaged. A two stage protocol has been developed to correct both system and object-induced distortion in pelvic images which incorporates measures to maintain the quality, accuracy and consistency of the imaging and correction procedures. The first stage of the correction procedure is described here and involves the removal of system distortion. Object- (patient-) induced effects will be described in a subsequent work. Images are acquired with the patient lying on a flat rigid bed, which reproduces treatment conditions. A frame of marker tubes surrounding the patient and attached to the bed provides quality assurance data in each image. System distortions in the three orthogonal planes are mapped using a separate phantom, which fits closely within the quality control frame. Software has been written which automates the measurement and checking of the many marker positions which the test objects generate and which ensures that patient data are acquired using a consistent imaging protocol. Results are presented which show that the scanner and the phantoms used in measuring distortion give highly reproducible results with mean changes of the order of 0.1 mm between repeated measurements of marker positions in the same imaging session. Effective correction for in plane components of system distortion is demonstrated.

[1]  M Thelen,et al.  MRI-assisted radiation therapy planning of brain tumors--clinical experiences in 17 patients. , 1991, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[2]  D. Hill,et al.  Accurate frameless registration of MR and CT images of the head: applications in planning surgery and radiation therapy. , 1994, Radiology.

[3]  B. Dawant,et al.  Effect of geometrical distortion correction in MR on image registration accuracy. , 1996, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[4]  L D Cromwell,et al.  MR imaging in radiation therapy planning. Work in progress. , 1985, Radiology.

[5]  A. Aisen,et al.  Integration of magnetic resonance imaging into radiation therapy treatment planning: I. Technical considerations. , 1987, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  L R Schad,et al.  MRA-guided stereotactic radiation treatment planning for cerebral angiomas. , 1992, Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics.

[7]  M A Moerland,et al.  Brain tumor delineation based on CT and MR imaging. Implications for radiotherapy treatment planning. , 1993, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al].

[8]  J. Michael Fitzpatrick,et al.  A technique for accurate magnetic resonance imaging in the presence of field inhomogeneities , 1992, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[9]  D L McShan,et al.  The clinical utility of magnetic resonance imaging in 3-dimensional treatment planning of brain neoplasms. , 1992, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  O Henriksen,et al.  Quality assessment in in vivo NMR spectroscopy: III. Clinical test objects: design, construction, and solutions. , 1995, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[11]  Gary H. Glover,et al.  MR susceptibility misregistration correction , 1993, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[12]  M A Moerland,et al.  Analysis of machine-dependent and object-induced geometric distortion in 2DFT MR imaging. , 1992, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[13]  D. Dearnaley,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): considerations and applications in radiotherapy treatment planning. , 1997, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.