Ubiquitous computing to support co-located clinical teams: Using the semiotics of physical objects in system design

OBJECTIVES Co-located teams often use material objects to communicate messages in collaboration. Modern desktop computing systems with abstract graphical user interface (GUIs) fail to support this material dimension of inter-personal communication. The aim of this study is to investigate how tangible user interfaces can be used in computer systems to better support collaborative routines among co-located clinical teams. METHODS The semiotics of physical objects used in team collaboration was analyzed from data collected during 1 month of observations at an emergency room. The resulting set of communication patterns was used as a framework when designing an experimental system. Following the principles of augmented reality, physical objects were mapped into a physical user interface with the goal of maintaining the symbolic value of those objects. RESULTS NOSTOS is an experimental ubiquitous computing environment that takes advantage of interaction devices integrated into the traditional clinical environment, including digital pens, walk-up displays, and a digital desk. The design uses familiar workplace tools to function as user interfaces to the computer in order to exploit established cognitive and collaborative routines. CONCLUSION Paper-based tangible user interfaces and digital desks are promising technologies for co-located clinical teams. A key issue that needs to be solved before employing such solutions in practice is associated with limited feedback from the passive paper interfaces.

[1]  C. Goodwin,et al.  Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon , 1992 .

[2]  Allison Druin,et al.  Single display groupware: a model for co-present collaboration , 1999, CHI '99.

[3]  B. Latour Visualization and cognition: thinking with eyes and hands , 1986 .

[4]  Eva Hornecker,et al.  Understanding the Benefits of Graspable Interfaces for Cooperative Use , 2002, COOP.

[5]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[6]  William Buxton,et al.  Graspable user interfaces , 1996 .

[7]  Arthur D. Fisk,et al.  Supporting Perception in the Service of Dynamic Decision Making , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[8]  Christopher Nemeth How Cognitive Artifacts Support Distributed Cognition in Acute Care , 2003 .

[9]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Cognitive artifacts , 1991 .

[10]  Hassan Gomaa,et al.  Prototyping as a tool in the specification of user requirements , 1981, ICSE '81.

[11]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Designing Interaction: Psychology at the Human-Computer Interface , 1991 .

[12]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  A comparison of reading paper and on-line documents , 1997, CHI.

[13]  Hirokazu Kato,et al.  Collaborative augmented reality , 2002, CACM.

[14]  Roy Want,et al.  Bridging physical and virtual worlds with electronic tags , 1999, CHI '99.

[15]  Tom Rodden,et al.  Designing with ethnography: a presentation framework for design , 1997, DIS '97.

[16]  Henrik Eriksson,et al.  Groupware for Case Management and Inter-Organizational Collaboration: The Virtual Rehabilitation Team , 2001, MedInfo.

[17]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  A tangible interface for organizing information using a grid , 2002, CHI.

[18]  A. Levison,et al.  Knowledge and society , 1966 .

[19]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  The myth of the paperless office , 2001 .

[20]  James H. Aylor,et al.  Computer for the 21st Century , 1999, Computer.

[21]  Marc Berg,et al.  Accumulating and Coordinating: Occasions for Information Technologies in Medical Work , 1999, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[22]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  How do people organize their desks?: Implications for the design of office information systems , 1983, TOIS.

[23]  E. Hutchins Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[24]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Emerging frameworks for tangible user interfaces , 2000, IBM Syst. J..

[25]  Wendy E. Mackay,et al.  Is paper safer? The role of paper flight strips in air traffic control , 1999, TCHI.

[26]  S. Kvale Interviews : an introduction to qualitative research interviewing , 1996 .

[27]  David Kirsh,et al.  The Context of Work , 2001, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[28]  Brian Hazlehurst,et al.  Getting the right tools for the job: distributed planning in cardiac surgery , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[29]  Mark Billinghurst,et al.  Communication Behaviors in Colocated Collaborative AR Interfaces , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[30]  T Timpka,et al.  Cognitive Tools in Medical Teamwork: The Spatial Arrangement of Patient Records , 2003, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[31]  Jeff A. Johnson,et al.  The Xerox Star: a retrospective , 1989, Computer.

[32]  Christian Heath,et al.  Technology in Action: The collaborative production of computer commands , 2000 .

[33]  John J. Gumperz,et al.  Contextualization and Understanding , 1989 .

[34]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , 1989 .