Effect of Leaf Occlusion on Leaf Area Index Inversion of Maize Using UAV-LiDAR Data

The leaf area index (LAI) is a key parameter for describing crop canopy structure, and is of great importance for early nutrition diagnosis and breeding research. Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) is an active remote sensing technology that can detect the vertical distribution of a crop canopy. To quantitatively analyze the influence of the occlusion effect, three flights of multi-route high-density LiDAR dataset were acquired at two time points, using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-mounted RIEGL VUX-1 laser scanner at an altitude of 15 m, to evaluate the validity of LAI estimation, in different layers, under different planting densities. The result revealed that normalized root-mean-square error (NRMSE) for the upper, middle, and lower layers were 10.8%, 12.4%, 42.8%, for 27,495 plants/ha, respectively. The relationship between the route direction and ridge direction was compared, and found that the direction of flight perpendicular to the maize planting ridge was better than that parallel to the maize planting ridge. The voxel-based method was used to invert the LAI, and we concluded that the optimal voxel size were concentrated on 0.040 m to 0.055 m, which was approximately 1.7 to 2.3 times of the average ground point distance. The detection of the occlusion effect in different layers under different planting densities, the relationship between the route and ridge directions, and the optimal voxel size could provide a guideline for UAV–LiDAR application in the crop canopy structure analysis.

[1]  A. Hoyano,et al.  Estimation of the leaf area density distribution of individual trees using high-resolution and multi-return airborne LiDAR data , 2015, 2206.11479.

[2]  T. Noland,et al.  Classification of tree species based on structural features derived from high density LiDAR data , 2013 .

[3]  Hamid Hamraz,et al.  Forest understory trees can be segmented accurately within sufficiently dense airborne laser scanning point clouds , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[4]  Kenji Omasa,et al.  Voxel-Based 3-D Modeling of Individual Trees for Estimating Leaf Area Density Using High-Resolution Portable Scanning Lidar , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  D. Xie,et al.  Review of indirect optical measurements of leaf area index: Recent advances, challenges, and perspectives , 2019, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology.

[6]  X. Mu,et al.  Indirect measurement of leaf area index on the basis of path length distribution , 2014 .

[7]  Alexandre Escolà,et al.  Application of light detection and ranging and ultrasonic sensors to high-throughput phenotyping and precision horticulture: current status and challenges , 2018, Horticulture Research.

[8]  Richard A. Fournier,et al.  Estimation of 3D vegetation density with Terrestrial Laser Scanning data using voxels. A sensitivity analysis of influencing parameters , 2017 .

[9]  Wenze Yang,et al.  Assessment of the impacts of surface topography, off-nadir pointing and vegetation structure on vegetation lidar waveforms using an extended geometric optical and radiative transfer model , 2011 .

[10]  R. Colombo,et al.  Retrieval of leaf area index in different vegetation types using high resolution satellite data , 2003 .

[11]  Jing Liu,et al.  Improving leaf area index (LAI) estimation by correcting for clumping and woody effects using terrestrial laser scanning , 2018, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology.

[12]  Yong Pang,et al.  Combining Airborne and Terrestrial Laser Scanning Technologies to Measure Forest Understorey Volume , 2017 .

[13]  Martin Beland,et al.  A model for deriving voxel-level tree leaf area density estimates from ground-based LiDAR , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[14]  W. Cohen,et al.  Lidar Remote Sensing for Ecosystem Studies , 2002 .

[15]  Hideki Kobayashi,et al.  How to quantify tree leaf area index in an open savanna ecosystem: A multi-instrument and multi-model approach , 2010 .

[16]  Lin Cao,et al.  Estimating Forest Structural Parameters Using Canopy Metrics Derived from Airborne LiDAR Data in Subtropical Forests , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[17]  J. Chen,et al.  Defining leaf area index for non‐flat leaves , 1992 .

[18]  Amine Merzouki,et al.  Estimation of Leaf Area Index (LAI) in corn and soybeans using multi-polarization C- and L-band radar data , 2015 .

[19]  Liu Qinhuo,et al.  Improved harvesting method for corn LAI measurement in corn whole growth stages , 2010 .

[20]  M. Lefsky,et al.  Impact of footprint diameter and off-nadir pointing on the precision of canopy height estimates from spaceborne lidar , 2011 .

[21]  J. Hanway.  How a corn plant develops , 1966 .

[22]  Xiaohuan Xi,et al.  Estimation of FPAR and FPAR profile for maize canopies using airborne LiDAR. , 2017 .

[23]  N. Coops,et al.  Comparing canopy metrics derived from terrestrial and airborne laser scanning in a Douglas-fir dominated forest stand , 2010, Trees.

[24]  Wolfgang Lucht,et al.  Global biomass mapping for an improved understanding of the CO2 balance—the Earth observation mission Carbon-3D , 2005 .

[25]  Jing Liu,et al.  Large off-nadir scan angle of airborne LiDAR can severely affect the estimates of forest structure metrics , 2018 .

[26]  Xiaoyu Song,et al.  Spatial Variability Analysis of Within-Field Winter Wheat Nitrogen and Grain Quality Using Canopy Fluorescence Sensor Measurements , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[27]  Håkan Olsson,et al.  Simulating the effects of lidar scanning angle for estimation of mean tree height and canopy closure , 2003 .

[28]  Guangjian Yan,et al.  Estimation of forest leaf area index using terrestrial laser scanning data and path length distribution model in open-canopy forests , 2018, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology.

[29]  Xiaohuan Xi,et al.  Estimating FPAR of maize canopy using airborne discrete-return LiDAR data. , 2014, Optics express.

[30]  Q. Guo,et al.  Evaluating maize phenotype dynamics under drought stress using terrestrial lidar , 2019, Plant Methods.

[31]  Sébastien Bauwens,et al.  Forest Inventory with Terrestrial LiDAR: A Comparison of Static and Hand-Held Mobile Laser Scanning , 2016 .

[32]  Guang Zheng,et al.  Computational-Geometry-Based Retrieval of Effective Leaf Area Index Using Terrestrial Laser Scanning , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[33]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Tree species classification in subtropical forests using small-footprint full-waveform LiDAR data , 2016, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[34]  Seth C. Murray,et al.  Multitemporal field-based plant height estimation using 3D point clouds generated from small unmanned aerial systems high-resolution imagery , 2018, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[35]  J. Chen,et al.  Retrieving Leaf Area Index of Boreal Conifer Forests Using Landsat TM Images , 1996 .

[36]  Wei Su,et al.  Estimation of the vertical leaf area profile of corn (Zea mays) plants using terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) , 2018, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[37]  J. Chen.  Optically-based methods for measuring seasonal variation of leaf area index in boreal conifer stands , 1996 .

[38]  Jose A. Jiménez-Berni,et al.  High Throughput Determination of Plant Height, Ground Cover, and Above-Ground Biomass in Wheat with LiDAR , 2018, Front. Plant Sci..

[39]  Matti Maltamo,et al.  Airborne discrete-return LIDAR data in the estimation of vertical canopy cover, angular canopy closure and leaf area index , 2011 .