Suspect screening and non-targeted analysis of drinking water using point-of-use filters.

Monitored contaminants in drinking water represent a small portion of the total compounds present, many of which may be relevant to human health. To understand the totality of human exposure to compounds in drinking water, broader monitoring methods are imperative. In an effort to more fully characterize the drinking water exposome, point-of-use water filtration devices (Brita® filters) were employed to collect time-integrated drinking water samples in a pilot study of nine North Carolina homes. A suspect screening analysis was performed by matching high resolution mass spectra of unknown features to molecular formulas from EPA's DSSTox database. Candidate compounds with those formulas were retrieved from the EPA's CompTox Chemistry Dashboard, a recently developed data hub for approximately 720,000 compounds. To prioritize compounds into those most relevant for human health, toxicity data from the US federal collaborative Tox21 program and the EPA ToxCast program, as well as exposure estimates from EPA's ExpoCast program, were used in conjunction with sample detection frequency and abundance to calculate a "ToxPi" score for each candidate compound. From ∼15,000 molecular features in the raw data, 91 candidate compounds were ultimately grouped into the highest priority class for follow up study. Fifteen of these compounds were confirmed using analytical standards including the highest priority compound, 1,2-Benzisothiazolin-3-one, which appeared in 7 out of 9 samples. The majority of the other high priority compounds are not targets of routine monitoring, highlighting major gaps in our understanding of drinking water exposures. General product-use categories from EPA's CPCat database revealed that several of the high priority chemicals are used in industrial processes, indicating the drinking water in central North Carolina may be impacted by local industries.

[1]  Valery Tkachenko,et al.  Identification of “Known Unknowns” Utilizing Accurate Mass Data and ChemSpider , 2011, Journal of The American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[2]  M. Loos,et al.  Quantitative target and systematic non-target analysis of polar organic micro-pollutants along the river Rhine using high-resolution mass-spectrometry--Identification of unknown sources and compounds. , 2015, Water research.

[3]  Ann M Richard,et al.  Linking high resolution mass spectrometry data with exposure and toxicity forecasts to advance high-throughput environmental monitoring. , 2016, Environment international.

[4]  M. Lorber,et al.  Simple intake and pharmacokinetic modeling to characterize exposure of Americans to perfluoroctanoic acid, PFOA. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  Imma Ferrer,et al.  Identification of Novel Perfluoroalkyl Ether Carboxylic Acids (PFECAs) and Sulfonic Acids (PFESAs) in Natural Waters Using Accurate Mass Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (TOFMS). , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  Jamie Bartram,et al.  Safer water, better health: costs, benefits and sustainability of interventions to protect and promote health. , 2008 .

[7]  Antony J. Williams,et al.  Integrating tools for non-targeted analysis research and chemical safety evaluations at the US EPA , 2017, Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology.

[8]  Peter Fantke,et al.  Exploring consumer exposure pathways and patterns of use for chemicals in the environment , 2015, Toxicology reports.

[9]  Thomas Letzel,et al.  Non-target screening with high-resolution mass spectrometry: critical review using a collaborative trial on water analysis , 2015, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[10]  Wolfgang Schulz,et al.  A new approach to data evaluation in the non-target screening of organic trace substances in water analysis. , 2011, Chemosphere.

[11]  David M. Reif,et al.  High-throughput models for exposure-based chemical prioritization in the ExpoCast project. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  Louis Theodore,et al.  Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) , 2006 .

[13]  A M Richard,et al.  An automated curation procedure for addressing chemical errors and inconsistencies in public datasets used in QSAR modelling$ , 2016, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[14]  Oliver Fiehn,et al.  Metabolomic database annotations via query of elemental compositions: Mass accuracy is insufficient even at less than 1 ppm , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[15]  Jon R. Sobus,et al.  Identifying known unknowns using the US EPA’s CompTox Chemistry Dashboard , 2017, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[16]  Michael R. Templeton,et al.  Assessing Exposure and Health Consequences of Chemicals in Drinking Water: Current State of Knowledge and Research Needs , 2013, Environmental health perspectives.

[17]  M. Lorber,et al.  An assessment of the exposure of Americans to perfluorooctane sulfonate: A comparison of estimated intake with values inferred from NHANES data , 2011, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[18]  Ord Us Epa Toxicity ForeCaster (ToxCast™) Data , 2015 .

[19]  Emma L. Schymanski,et al.  Open Science for Identifying "Known Unknown" Chemicals. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  Stephen M Rappaport,et al.  Environment and Disease Risks , 2010, Science.

[21]  S. Snyder,et al.  Point‐of‐Use Devices for Attenuation of Trace Organic Compounds in Water , 2015 .

[22]  C. Wild Complementing the Genome with an “Exposome”: The Outstanding Challenge of Environmental Exposure Measurement in Molecular Epidemiology , 2005, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[23]  Wolfgang Schulz,et al.  Application of Non-Target Analysis with LC-HRMS for the Monitoring of Raw and Potable Water: Strategy and Results: Assessing Transformation Products of Chemicals by Non-Target and Suspect Screening − Strategies and Workflows Volume 2 , 2016 .

[24]  Emma L. Schymanski,et al.  Strategies to characterize polar organic contamination in wastewater: exploring the capability of high resolution mass spectrometry. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[25]  Emma L. Schymanski,et al.  Identifying small molecules via high resolution mass spectrometry: communicating confidence. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.