Procedure Guideline for Diuretic Renography in Children 3.0*

Hydronephrosis (distension of the pelvicalyceal system) is one of the most common indications for radionuclide evaluation of the kidneys in pediatrie patients. The etiology of the hydronephrosis can be an obstructed renal pelvis, an obstructed ureter, vesicoureteral reflux, the bladder itself or the bladder outlet, infection or congenital in nature. Contrast intravenous urography, ultrasonography and con ventional radionuclide renography cannot reliably differentiate obstructive from nonobstructive causes of hydronephrosis and hydroureteronephrosis (distension of the pelvicalyceal system and ureter). The pressure perfusion study (Whitaker test), which mea sures collecting system pressure under conditions of increased pelvic infusion is relatively invasive. The evaluation of function in the presence of obstruction does not give reliable indication of potential for recovery following surgical correction. High pressure in the collecting system results in reduction of renal blood flow and function. The most common cause of unilateral obstruction is the presence of a ureteropelvic obstruction. Obstructions can also occur more distally at the ureterovesical junction. Bilateral hydronephrosis can be produced by posterior urethral valves, bilateral ureteropelvic obstructions or even a full bladder. The purpose of diuretic renography is to differentiate a true obstruction from a dilated nonobstructed system (stasis) by serial imaging after intravenous administration of furosemide (Lasix).

[1]  Hamphrey R Ham,et al.  Pediatric applications of renal nuclear medicine. , 2006, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[2]  Jacob D Kuyvenhoven,et al.  The estimation of renal transit using renography – our opinion , 2004, Nuclear medicine communications.

[3]  J. Conway Radionuclide cystography. , 1984, Contributions to nephrology.

[4]  S. Meller,et al.  Renal scintigraphy: quantitative assessment of upper urinary tract dilatation in children. , 1981, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[5]  V. Artiko,et al.  Diuresis renal scintigraphy "F-0" in diagnosing of upper urinary tract obstruction in children: the clinical significance. , 2005, Nuclear medicine review. Central & Eastern Europe.

[6]  M. Matzinger,et al.  A prospective randomized trial comparing 2 diuresis renography techniques for evaluation of suspected upper urinary tract obstruction in children. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[7]  A. Ghaly,et al.  Postnatal unilateral pelviureteral junction obstruction: impact of pyeloplasty and conservative management on renal function. , 2005, Urology.

[8]  M G Stabin,et al.  Dosimetry of pediatric nuclear medicine procedures. , 1998, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology.

[9]  M. Majd,et al.  Evaluation and management of upper urinary tract obstruction in infancy and childhood. , 1985, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[10]  J. Frøkiaer,et al.  Congenital unilateral hydronephrosis: a review of the impact of diuretic renography on clinical treatment. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[11]  Young Ha Park,et al.  Influence of hydration status in normal subjects: fractional analysis of parameters of Tc-99m DTPA and Tc-99m MAG3 renography , 2005, Annals of nuclear medicine.

[12]  G. Sfakianakis,et al.  Diuretic MAG3 scintirenography in children with HIV nephropathy: diffuse parenchymal dysfunction. , 2000, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  J. Miller,et al.  Evaluation of obstructive uropathy in children: radionuclide renography vs. the Whitaker test. , 1984, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  R. Leveillee,et al.  A comparison of unenhanced helical computerized tomography findings and renal obstruction determined by furosemide 99m technetium mercaptoacetyltriglycine diuretic scintirenography for patients with acute renal colic. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[15]  M. Gelfand,et al.  Low grade pelviureteric junction obstruction with normal diuretic renography. , 1986, British journal of urology.

[16]  H. Ham,et al.  99mTc-MAG3 diuretic renography in children: a comparison between F0 and F+20 , 2003, Nuclear medicine communications.

[17]  D. Barrieras,et al.  Impact of early screening for reflux in siblings on the detection of renal damage , 2004, BJU international.

[18]  K. Ismaili,et al.  How to interpret a deterioration of split function? , 2005, European urology.

[19]  J. Conway "Well-tempered" diuresis renography: its historical development, physiological and technical pitfalls, and standardized technique protocol. , 1992, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[20]  J. Skurnick,et al.  The F + 0 protocol for diuretic renography results in fewer interrupted studies due to voiding than the F - 15 protocol. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  P. O’Reilly Re: A comparison of pressure flow studies and renography in equivocal upper urinary tract obstruction. , 1984, The Journal of urology.

[22]  G. Sfakianakis,et al.  Renal scintigraphy in infants and children. , 2001, Urology.

[23]  G. F. Gates,et al.  Consensus report on quality control of quantitative measurements of renal function obtained from the renogram: International Consensus Committee from the Scientific Committee of Radionuclides in Nephrourology. , 1999, Seminars in nuclear medicine.