Pre-classification and post-classification change-detection techniques to monitor land-cover and land-use change using multi-temporal Landsat imagery: a case study on Pisa Province in Italy

This article explores the simultaneous use of pre-classification and post-classification change-detection techniques to map and monitor land-cover and land-use change using multi-temporal Landsat Multi-spectral Scanner and Enhanced Thematic Mapper plus data over one of the most important tourism centres of Italy (e.g. Pisa Province) for 1972, 2000 and 2006. Pre-classification approaches of principal-component analysis and band combination are potentially tailored to reduce data redundancy of the satellite imagery in order to highlight different objects of significance for change-detection analysis across time-series data. In this work, the application of pre-classification techniques could contribute to produce land-cover and land-use maps with higher quality of classification. At this point, the average value of overall classification accuracies for the three classification outputs was an estimated 90%. Then, ‘from–to’ change information, as well as the area and the type of landscape transformations, are provided through the post-classification technique. The findings of this study show that the province of Pisa has significantly experienced a high rate of deforestation and urban development over past decades. It is revealed that artificial structures (e.g. urban and industrial zones) in Pisa Province increased at a change rate of around 265% and forested land decreased from approximately 45% to 32% of the total area of the province between 1972 and 2006. Likewise, the perceptible growth of built-up structures from about 4% to 10.6% in Pisa City during this 34-year period has imposed a heavy pressure on the landscape of Pisa.

[1]  Robert D. Tortora,et al.  A Note on Sample Size Estimation for Multinomial Populations , 1978 .

[2]  T. Lin,et al.  The Lambertian assumption and Landsat data. , 1980 .

[3]  Philip J. Howarth,et al.  Landsat digital enhancements for change detection in urban environments , 1983 .

[4]  John Townshend,et al.  Multitemporal Dimensionality of Images of Normalized Difference Vegetation Index at Continental Scales , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  A. R. Harrison,et al.  Standardized principal components , 1985 .

[6]  E. LeDrew,et al.  Application of principal components analysis to change detection , 1987 .

[7]  Ashbindu Singh,et al.  Review Article Digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data , 1989 .

[8]  William B. Meyer,et al.  Modeling land use and cover as part of global environmental change , 1994 .

[9]  D. Skole,et al.  Land Use and Land Cover Change , 2014 .

[10]  Pol Coppin,et al.  Change Detection in Forest Ecosystems with Remote Sensing Digital Imagery , 1996 .

[11]  M. Bauer,et al.  Digital change detection in forest ecosystems with remote sensing imagery , 1996 .

[12]  M. Ridd,et al.  A Comparison of Four Algorithms for Change Detection in an Urban Environment , 1998 .

[13]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data : principles and practices , 1998 .

[14]  J. Mas Monitoring land-cover changes: A comparison of change detection techniques , 1999 .

[15]  R. Lathrop,et al.  Land resource impact indicators of urban sprawl , 2003 .

[16]  J. Puyravaud Standardizing the calculation of the annual rate of deforestation , 2003 .

[17]  Pol Coppin,et al.  Review ArticleDigital change detection methods in ecosystem monitoring: a review , 2004 .

[18]  M. Bauer,et al.  Land cover classification and change analysis of the Twin Cities (Minnesota) Metropolitan Area by multitemporal Landsat remote sensing , 2005 .

[19]  Eric F. Lambin,et al.  Land-Use and Land-Cover Change , 2006 .

[20]  Siamak Khorram,et al.  Correspondence analysis for detecting land cover change , 2006 .