Minimum-variance control for woofer-tweeter systems in adaptive optics.

The woofer-tweeter concept in adaptive optics consists in correcting for the turbulent wavefront disturbance with a combination of two deformable mirrors (DMs). The woofer corrects for temporally slow-evolving, spatially low-frequency, large-amplitude disturbances, whereas the tweeter is generally its complement, i.e., corrects for faster higher-order modes with lower amplitude. A special feature is that in general both are able to engender a common correction space. In this contribution a minimum-variance solution for the double stage woofer-tweeter concept in adaptive optics systems is addressed using a linear-quadratic-Gaussian approach. An analytical model is built upon previous developments on a single DM with temporal dynamics that accommodates a double-stage woofer-tweeter DM. Monte Carlo simulations are run for a system featuring an 8×8 actuator DM (considered infinitely fast), mounted on a steering tip/tilt platform (considered slow). Results show that it is essential to take into account temporal dynamics on the estimation step. Besides, unlike the other control strategies considered, the optimal solution is always stable.

[1]  Torsten Söderström,et al.  Discrete-time Stochastic Systems , 2002 .

[2]  Jason D. Schmidt,et al.  Adaptive control of woofer-tweeter adaptive optics , 2009, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[3]  Jean-Marc Conan,et al.  Optimal control, observers and integrators in adaptive optics. , 2006, Optics express.

[4]  Caroline Kulcsár,et al.  Minimum‐variance control of astronomical adaptive optic systems with actuator dynamics under synchronous and asynchronous sampling , 2011 .

[5]  Jean-Pierre Véran,et al.  Type II Woofer-Tweeter Control for NFIRAOS on TMT , 2009 .

[6]  Jean-Marc Conan,et al.  Minimum variance control for the woofer-tweeter concept , 2009 .

[7]  Jean-Marc Conan,et al.  On the optimal reconstruction and control of adaptive optical systems with mirror dynamics. , 2010, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[8]  J. Herrmann,et al.  Phase variance and Strehl ratio in adaptive optics , 1992 .

[9]  R Conan,et al.  Distributed modal command for a two-deformable-mirror adaptive optics system. , 2007, Applied optics.

[10]  Jean-Marc Conan,et al.  Minimum variance control in presence of actuator saturation in adaptive optics , 2008, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[11]  R. Noll Zernike polynomials and atmospheric turbulence , 1976 .

[12]  Francois Roddier,et al.  Adaptive Optics in Astronomy: Imaging through the atmosphere , 2004 .

[13]  Jean-Pierre Véran,et al.  Woofer-tweeter control in an adaptive optics system using a Fourier reconstructor. , 2008, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[14]  Troy A. Rhoadarmer,et al.  Performance of a woofer-tweeter deformable mirror control architecture for high-bandwidth high-spatial resolution adaptive optics , 2006, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[15]  Colin Bradley,et al.  Control of a woofer tweeter system of deformable mirrors , 2006, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[16]  J. Hardy,et al.  Adaptive Optics for Astronomical Telescopes , 1998 .

[17]  Y. Bar-Shalom,et al.  Dual effect, certainty equivalence, and separation in stochastic control , 1974 .

[18]  B. Anderson,et al.  Optimal control: linear quadratic methods , 1990 .

[19]  J. Conan,et al.  Wave-front temporal spectra in high-resolution imaging through turbulence , 1995 .