Development of a BCCT Quantitative 3D Evaluation System through Low-Cost Solutions

Breast cancer is one of the most mediated malignant diseases, because of its high incidence and prevalence, but principally because of its physical and psychological invasivity. Breast Cancer Conservative Treatments (BCCT) allows a local control of the disease, with a survival similar to that obtained with a mastectomy, but with a better aesthetic result: the tumor is excised together with a small healthy tissue layer. In BCCT the surgical outcome depends on several factors, many of them difficult to assess, thus leading to a significantly heterogeneous results. For this reason, it is fundamental to evaluate specific surgical procedures on the basis of their aesthetic outcome through specific quantitative tools. The Breast Cancer Conservative Treatment.cosmetic results (BCCT.core), is a software recently developed with the objective to overcome the limitations of reproducibility and objectivity of the methods currently used to evaluate the aesthetic result of BCCT. This software is based on the comparison between the treated and non-treated breast in frontal photographs from the patients. Several indices related to the surgical aesthetic result are automatically obtained from the image, making the evaluation fast, easy and reproducible. Although the BCCT.core system presents satisfactory results, presents a significant limitation. The female breast is a complex three dimensional (3D) object and its boundaries are rather fuzzily defined in two dimensional (2D) pictures, thus making difficult the body landmarks identification. On the contrary, the use of a 3D model would allow the comparison between real geometrical characteristics of the breasts including the possibility of estimating volume and 3D surface differences, in order to plan future surgical interventions. The goal of this work is the development of a simple 3D model of a female torso, using low-cost solutions, namely: a reconstruction algorithm from two uncalibrated views, through epipolar geometry approach and making use of a Kinect sensor device. The created model will be used in an updated version of a BCCT.core to obtain a full 3D aesthetic assessment of the surgical outcome. With the inclusion of measurements extracted from the 3D model, aiming to improve the global assessment result, without increasing its complexity, as the pictures are acquired with a single camera without requiring any calibration procedure.

[1]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  Computer Vision - Algorithms and Applications , 2011, Texts in Computer Science.

[2]  E van der Schueren,et al.  Cosmetic evaluation of breast conserving treatment for mammary cancer. 1. Proposal of a quantitative scoring system. , 1989, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[3]  Albert Losken,et al.  An Objective Evaluation of Breast Symmetry and Shape Differences Using 3-Dimensional Images , 2005, Annals of plastic surgery.

[4]  Jaime S. Cardoso,et al.  Improving the BCCT.core model with lateral information , 2010, Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Conference on Information Technology and Applications in Biomedicine.

[5]  Tomas Kron,et al.  A comparison of methods of cosmetic assessment in breast conservation treatment , 1996 .

[6]  Andrea Fusiello,et al.  Quasi-Euclidean epipolar rectification of uncalibrated images , 2010, Machine Vision and Applications.

[7]  Maria João Cardoso,et al.  Interobserver agreement and consensus over the esthetic evaluation of conservative treatment for breast cancer. , 2006, Breast.

[8]  Giovanni Maria Farinella,et al.  Unambiguous Analysis of Woman Breast Shape for Plastic Surgery Outcome Evaluation , 2006 .

[9]  Marco Riboldi,et al.  Integrated 3D Body Scanner with Real-Time Compensation of Breathing Movement Artifacts , 2010 .

[10]  Giuseppe Catanuto,et al.  New technologies for the assessment of breast surgical outcomes. , 2009, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[11]  Anna Niwin¯ska,et al.  Cosmetic evaluation of breast conserving treatment for mammary cancer , 1998 .

[12]  J. Soares,et al.  Uncalibrated stereo vision applied to breast cancer treatment aesthetic assessment , 2011 .

[13]  Jaime S. Cardoso,et al.  An accurate and interpretable model for BCCT.core , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[14]  Jaime S. Cardoso,et al.  Choosing observers for evaluation of aesthetic results in breast cancer conservative treatment. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  R. Macmillan,et al.  Oncological and cosmetic outcomes of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery. , 2005, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[16]  Jaime S. Cardoso,et al.  Modelling ordinal relations with SVMs: An application to objective aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment , 2005, Neural Networks.

[17]  I. Fentiman,et al.  Breast compliance: A new method for evaluation of cosmetic outcome after conservative treatment of early breast cancer , 1990, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[18]  Bernhard P. Wrobel,et al.  Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision , 2001 .

[19]  Albert Losken,et al.  Three-dimensional digital evaluation of breast symmetry after breast conservation therapy. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[20]  Albert Losken,et al.  Validating Three-Dimensional Imaging of the Breast , 2005, Annals of plastic surgery.

[21]  Umberto Veronesi,et al.  Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  M. Gnant,et al.  The use of a breast symmetry index for objective evaluation of breast cosmesis. , 2007, Breast.

[23]  Hiroki Inui,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of the Reconstructed Breast Using a 3-Dimensional Laser Light Scanner , 2006, Annals of plastic surgery.

[24]  S Hellman,et al.  Analysis of cosmetic results following primary radiation therapy for stages I and II carcinoma of the breast. , 1979, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[25]  J O Archambeau,et al.  Breast retraction assessment: an objective evaluation of cosmetic results of patients treated conservatively for breast cancer. , 1985, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  E. Van Der Schueren,et al.  More detailed documentation of operative procedures in breast conserving treatment: what good will it do us? , 1996, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[27]  Jaime S. Cardoso,et al.  Towards an intelligent medical system for the aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment , 2007, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[28]  Jong-Hyeon Jeong,et al.  Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  Giuseppe Catanuto,et al.  Motion Compensation in Hand-held Laser Scanning for Surface Modeling in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery , 2009, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[30]  Naveen Kumar,et al.  Mammometrics: the standardization of aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. , 2010, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[31]  G Catanuto,et al.  Experimental methodology for digital breast shape analysis and objective surgical outcome evaluation. , 2008, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[32]  Katja Schwenzer-Zimmerer,et al.  Comparison between breast volume measurement using 3D surface imaging and classical techniques. , 2007, Breast.