Block sparse vector recovery via weighted generalized range space property

In block sparse vector recovery problems we are interested in finding the vector with the least number of active blocks that best describes the observation. The convex relaxation of that problem, typically used to reduce complexity, is strictly equivalent with the original problem only when certain conditions are met, such as Restricted Isometry Property, Null Space Characterization, and Block Mutual Coherence. In practice, those conditions may not be satisfied, which implies that solving the relaxed problem may not retrieve the block sparsest solution. In this paper, we propose a weighted approach, which, in the noise free case and under certain conditions guarantees that the relaxed problem solution has the same support as the sparsest block vector. The weights can be obtained based on a low resolution estimate of the group sparse signal.

[1]  Axel Flinth,et al.  Optimal Choice of Weights for Sparse Recovery With Prior Information , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[2]  Michael Elad,et al.  Optimally sparse representation in general (nonorthogonal) dictionaries via ℓ1 minimization , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Thomas Strohmer,et al.  Compressed sensing radar , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[4]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Decoding by linear programming , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[5]  Babak Hassibi,et al.  On the Reconstruction of Block-Sparse Signals With an Optimal Number of Measurements , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[6]  Selin Aviyente,et al.  Compressed Sensing Framework for EEG Compression , 2007, 2007 IEEE/SP 14th Workshop on Statistical Signal Processing.

[7]  Laleh Najafizadeh,et al.  Sparse target scene reconstruction for SAR using range space rotation , 2016, 2016 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf).

[8]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Robust Recovery of Signals From a Structured Union of Subspaces , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[9]  A. Lee Swindlehurst,et al.  Matching Pursuit and Source Deflation for Sparse EEG/MEG Dipole Moment Estimation , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  Athina P. Petropulu,et al.  EEG sparse source localization via Range Space Rotation , 2015, 2015 IEEE 6th International Workshop on Computational Advances in Multi-Sensor Adaptive Processing (CAMSAP).

[11]  Paco López-Dekker,et al.  A Novel Strategy for Radar Imaging Based on Compressive Sensing , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[12]  Balas K. Natarajan,et al.  Sparse Approximate Solutions to Linear Systems , 1995, SIAM J. Comput..

[13]  Joachim H. G. Ender,et al.  On compressive sensing applied to radar , 2010, Signal Process..

[14]  M. Lustig,et al.  Compressed Sensing MRI , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[15]  Justin P. Haldar,et al.  Compressed-Sensing MRI With Random Encoding , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  Yun-Bin Zhao,et al.  RSP-Based Analysis for Sparsest and Least $\ell_1$-Norm Solutions to Underdetermined Linear Systems , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[17]  W. Carrara,et al.  Spotlight synthetic aperture radar : signal processing algorithms , 1995 .

[18]  Athina P. Petropulu,et al.  Generalized range space property for group sparsity of linear underdetermined systems , 2016, 2016 Annual Conference on Information Science and Systems (CISS).

[19]  R. DeVore,et al.  Compressed sensing and best k-term approximation , 2008 .

[20]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Block-Sparse Signals: Uncertainty Relations and Efficient Recovery , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[21]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  MIMO Radar Using Compressive Sampling , 2009, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.