Iran, Terrorism, and Weapons of Mass Destruction
暂无分享,去创建一个
This article reviews Iran's past and current use of terrorism and assesses why U.S. attempts to halt Iran's efforts have met with little success. With this assessment in mind, it argues that Iran is not likely transfer chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons to terrorist groups for several reasons. First, providing terrorists with such unconventional weapons offers Iran few tactical advantages as these groups are able to operate effectively with existing methods and weapons. Second, Iran has become more cautious in its backing of terrorists in recent years. And third, Tehran is highly aware that any major escalation in its support for terrorism would incur U.S. wrath and international condemnation. The article concludes by offering recommendations for decreasing Iran's support for terrorism.
[1] J. Harik. Hezbollah: The Changing Face of Terrorism , 2004 .
[2] Paul R. Pillar. Terrorism and U.S. foreign policy , 2001 .
[3] Hala Jaber,et al. Hezbollah: Born with a Vengeance , 1997 .
[4] G. Sick. Iran: Confronting terrorism , 2003 .
[5] Kenneth M. Pollack. The Persian Puzzle: The Conflict Between Iran and America , 2004 .