Empirical Study of Risk Assessment and Allocation of Public-Private Partnership Projects in China

Earlier research studies on public-private partnership (PPP) indicated that an objective, reliable, and practical risk assessment model for PPP projects and an equitable risk allocation mechanism among different parties are crucial to the successful implementation of these PPP projects. However, actual empirical research works in this research area are limited. This paper reports the first stage of a research study, which aims to identify and assess the principal risks for the delivery of PPP projects in China and to address their proper risk allocation between the private and public sectors. An empirical questionnaire survey was designed to examine the relative importance of different risk factors and to analyze the allocation of risk factors to different parties in PPP projects. A total of 580 questionnaires were sent out, and a total of 105 valid responses were obtained for data analysis. The Mann-Whitney U test is employed to investigate whether significant difference in perception existed first between the private and public sectors and second between industrial practitioners and academics in China. The empirical findings show that the three most important risk factors for PPP projects in China are (1) government intervention; (2) government corruption; and (3) poor public decision-making processes. These findings reveal that the Chinese government intervention and corruption may be the major obstacles to the success of PPP projects in China. A major cause for these risks may be attributed to inefficient legislative and supervisory systems for PPP projects in China. After conducting the Mann-Whitney U test on the 105 survey respondents, the empirical findings indicate that the perceptions of all 34 risk factors in China between the private and public sectors were not significantly different. Similarly, there were no significant differences between academics and industrial practitioners except that the former perceived the problem of government corruption to be more severe than did the latter. For risk allocation, the empirical results indicate that the public and private sectors were in general consensus with most of the risks identified. The major risks that the public sector preferred to accept are within the systematic risk category, especially political, legal, and social risks. The private sector preferred to retain the principal risks within the specific project risk category, especially construction, operation, and relationship risks, in addition to economic risks within systematic risk category. The remaining risk, environment risk, is preferred to be shared between the two sectors. This research study enables international construction companies to better understand how risks should be assessed and allocated for PPP projects in China. It also assists in risk response planning and control for future PPP projects in China. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000049. © 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers.

[1]  Qiming Li,et al.  Performance Objectives Selection Model in Public-Private Partnership Projects Based on the Perspective of Stakeholders , 2010 .

[2]  Patrick T.I. Lam,et al.  Potential Obstacles to Successful Implementation of Public-Private Partnerships in Beijing and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region , 2010 .

[3]  Tillmann Sachs,et al.  Quantifying Qualitative Information on Risks: Development of the QQIR Method , 2009 .

[4]  Jose Manuel Vassallo,et al.  Using Public-Private Partnerships to Expand Subways: Madrid-Barajas International Airport Case Study , 2009 .

[5]  Dongping Fang,et al.  A life‐cycle risk management framework for PPP infrastructure projects , 2008 .

[6]  Xiaohua Jin,et al.  Interpreting risk allocation mechanism in public–private partnership projects: an empirical study in a transaction cost economics perspective , 2008 .

[7]  A. Roumboutsos,et al.  Public–private partnership projects in Greece: risk ranking and preferred risk allocation , 2008 .

[8]  S. El-Sayegh.  Risk assessment and allocation in the UAE construction industry , 2008 .

[9]  Qiping Shen,et al.  Comparative Study of the Variables in Construction Project Briefing/Architectural Programming , 2008 .

[10]  Antonio Estache,et al.  Public-Private Partnerships in Transport , 2007 .

[11]  Soumitra Sharma.  Exploring Best Practices in Public Private Partnership (PPP) in e-Government through Select Asian Case Studies , 2007, CSREA EEE.

[12]  Dan Wang,et al.  Modelling risk allocation decision in construction contracts , 2007 .

[13]  R. Tiong,et al.  Analysis of political risks and opportunities in public private partnerships (PPP) in China and selected Asian countries , 2007 .

[14]  F. Medda.  A game theory approach for the allocation of risks in transport public private partnerships , 2007 .

[15]  Olena Maslyukivska,et al.  European infrastructure procurement through PPP , 2007 .

[16]  M. Loosemore,et al.  Risk allocation in the private provision of public infrastructure , 2007 .

[17]  Mark L. Berenson,et al.  Basic Business Statistics : Concepts and Applications , 2007 .

[18]  Liyin Shen,et al.  Role of public private partnerships to manage risks in public sector projects in Hong Kong , 2006 .

[19]  John Adams,et al.  Public private partnerships in China , 2006 .

[20]  M. Petrie,et al.  Public-Private Partnerships, Government Guarantees, and Fiscal Risk , 2006 .

[21]  Andi.  The importance and allocation of risks in Indonesian construction projects , 2006 .

[22]  Joanna Chataway,et al.  The International AIDS Vaccine Initiative (IAVI): Is it Getting New Science and Technology to the World's Neglected Majority? , 2006 .

[23]  G. Baker,et al.  Integrity Systems and Local Government , 2005 .

[24]  Xueqing Zhang,et al.  Critical Success Factors for Public-Private Partnerships in Infrastructure Development , 2005 .

[25]  A. Akintoye,et al.  The allocation of risk in PPP/PFI construction projects in the UK , 2005 .

[26]  Partnerships in oil and gas production‐sharing contracts , 2004 .

[27]  M. Dulaimi,et al.  Risk management framework for construction projects in developing countries , 2004 .

[28]  K. Hartley,et al.  Transaction costs, relational contracting and public private partnerships: a case study of UK defence , 2003 .

[29]  M. Handley-Schachler,et al.  Can the private finance initiative be used in emerging economies? – lessons from the UK’s successes and failures , 2003 .

[30]  M. Lewis,et al.  Evaluating the risks of public private partnerships for infrastructure projects , 2002 .

[31]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  Investments in container terminals: public private partnerships , 2002 .

[32]  J. G. Perry,et al.  How practitioners set share fractions in target cost contracts , 2002 .

[33]  Mohan M. Kumaraswamy,et al.  Governmental role in BOT-led infrastructure development , 2001 .

[34]  G. Wu,et al.  Risk Assessment for Construction Joint Ventures in China , 2001 .

[35]  Bruce L. Bowerman,et al.  Business Statistics in Practice , 2001 .

[36]  ShouQing Wang,et al.  Evaluation and Management of Political Risks in China's BOT Projects , 2000 .

[37]  R. Utt.  How Public-Private Partnerships Can Facilitate Public School Construction. Backgrounder No. 1257. , 1999 .

[38]  Earle W. Holmes,et al.  Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures. David J. Sheskin. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1997, 719 pp. $79.95. ISBN 0-8493-3119-6. , 1998 .

[39]  P. Gallimore,et al.  Perceptions of risk in the Private Finance Initiative , 1997 .

[40]  David J. Sheskin,et al.  Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures , 1997 .

[41]  Leslie Allen Veditz.  The Channel Tunnel -- A Case Study , 1993 .

[42]  Jamal F. Al‐Bahar,et al.  Systematic Risk Management Approach for Construction Projects , 1990 .