A Machine Learning-Based Fast-Forward Solver for Ground Penetrating Radar With Application to Full-Waveform Inversion

The simulation, or forward modeling, of ground penetrating radar (GPR) is becoming a more frequently used approach to facilitate the interpretation of complex real GPR data, and as an essential component of full-waveform inversion (FWI). However, general full-wave 3-D electromagnetic (EM) solvers, such as the ones based on the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method, are still computationally demanding for simulating realistic GPR problems. We have developed a novel near-real-time, forward modeling approach for GPR that is based on a machine learning (ML) architecture. The ML framework uses an innovative training method that combines a predictive principal component analysis technique, a detailed model of the GPR transducer, and a large data set of modeled GPR responses from our FDTD simulation software. The ML-based forward solver is parameterized for a specific GPR application, but the framework can be applied to many different classes of GPR problems. To demonstrate the novelty and computational efficiency of our ML-based GPR forward solver, we used it to carry out FWI for a common infrastructure assessment application—determining the location and diameter of reinforcement bars in concrete. We tested our FWI with synthetic and real data and found a good level of accuracy in determining the rebar location, size, and surrounding material properties from both data sets. The combination of the near-real-time computation, which is orders of magnitude less than what is achievable by traditional full-wave 3-D EM solvers, and the accuracy of our ML-based forward model is a significant step toward commercially viable applications of FWI of GPR.

[1]  K. Yee Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving maxwell's equations in isotropic media , 1966 .

[2]  A. Shaaria,et al.  Modelling the propagation of a radar signal through concrete as a low-pass filter , 2004 .

[3]  X. Lucas Travassos,et al.  Ground Penetrating Radar , 2008 .

[4]  H. S. Lien,et al.  Measurement radius of reinforcing steel bar in concrete using digital image GPR , 2009 .

[5]  V. Utsi,et al.  Measurement of reinforcement bar depths and diameters in concrete , 2004, Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Grounds Penetrating Radar, 2004. GPR 2004..

[6]  Jerzy Pietrasinski,et al.  Principal Component Analysis in interpretation of A-Scan measurements in GPR system , 2014, 2014 15th International Radar Symposium (IRS).

[7]  Lara Pajewski,et al.  Automated data extraction from synthetic and real radargrams of district heating pipelines , 2017, 2017 9th International Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar (IWAGPR).

[8]  Harry Vereecken,et al.  Quantitative conductivity and permittivity estimation using full-waveform inversion of on-ground GPR data , 2012 .

[9]  Harry Vereecken,et al.  Improved Characterization of Fine-Texture Soils Using On-Ground GPR Full-Waveform Inversion , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[10]  Craig Warren,et al.  Realistic FDTD GPR Antenna Models Optimized Using a Novel Linear/Nonlinear Full-Waveform Inversion , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[11]  Jacques R. Ernst,et al.  Application of a new 2D time-domain full-waveform inversion scheme to crosshole radar data , 2007 .

[12]  John B. Shoven,et al.  I , Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal.

[13]  Craig Warren,et al.  gprMax: Open source software to simulate electromagnetic wave propagation for Ground Penetrating Radar , 2016, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[14]  Craig Warren,et al.  A Machine Learning Approach For Simulating Ground Penetrating Radar , 2018, 2018 17th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR).

[15]  Craig Warren,et al.  Creating FDTD models of commercial GPR antennas using Taguchi’s optimisation method , 2011 .

[16]  Pongsak Wiwatrojanagul,et al.  A new method to determine locations of rebars and estimate cover thickness of RC structures using GPR data , 2017 .

[17]  Fernando I. Rial,et al.  Ground-penetrating radar for the structural evaluation of masonry bridges: Results and interpretational tools , 2012 .

[19]  Steve Millard,et al.  Dielectric properties of concrete and their influence on radar testing , 2000 .

[20]  A. Benedetto,et al.  Large-scale analysis of dielectric and mechanical properties of pavement using GPR and LFWD , 2014, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar.

[21]  Jorge C. Pais,et al.  Laboratory observation of cracks in road pavements with GPR , 2017 .

[22]  A. Bitri,et al.  Evaluation of GPR techniques for civil-engineering applications: study on a test site , 2000 .

[23]  Guigang Zhang,et al.  Deep Learning , 2016, Int. J. Semantic Comput..

[24]  Heekuck Oh,et al.  Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition , 1993, Adv. Comput..

[25]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[26]  Nitish Srivastava,et al.  Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting , 2014, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[27]  A. Giannopoulos,et al.  A Novel Piecewise Linear Recursive Convolution Approach for Dispersive Media Using the Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[28]  Jorge Luís Porsani,et al.  GPR applied to mapping utilities along the route of the Line 4 (yellow) subway tunnel construction in São Paulo City, Brazil , 2012 .

[29]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[30]  Fabrizio D'Amico,et al.  An overview of ground-penetrating radar signal processing techniques for road inspections , 2017, Signal Process..

[31]  H. Vereecken,et al.  Estimation of subsurface cylindrical object properties from GPR full-waveform inversion , 2017, 2017 9th International Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar (IWAGPR).

[32]  Craig Warren,et al.  A CUDA-based GPU engine for gprMax: Open source FDTD electromagnetic simulation software , 2019, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[33]  Jürgen Schmidhuber,et al.  Deep learning in neural networks: An overview , 2014, Neural Networks.

[34]  Fawwaz T. Ulaby,et al.  Corrections to "Dielectric Properties of Soils in the 0.3-1.3-GHz Range" , 1995, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[35]  Pascal Vincent,et al.  Representation Learning: A Review and New Perspectives , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[36]  Antonios Giannopoulos,et al.  Model-Based Evaluation of Signal-to-Clutter Ratio for Landmine Detection Using Ground-Penetrating Radar , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[37]  Jacques R. Ernst,et al.  A New Vector Waveform Inversion Algorithm for Simultaneous Updating of Conductivity and Permittivity Parameters From Combination Crosshole/Borehole-to-Surface GPR Data , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[38]  Francesco Soldovieri,et al.  GPR ESTIMATION OF THE GEOMETRICAL FEATURESOF BURIED METALLIC TARGETS IN TESTING CONDI-TIONS , 2013 .

[39]  Fabrizio D'Amico,et al.  GPR Applications Across Engineering and Geosciences Disciplines in Italy: A Review , 2016, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[40]  Anatoly Dolgiy,et al.  Optimal Radius Estimation for Subsurface Pipes Detected by Ground Penetrating Radar , 2006 .

[41]  G B Kaplan,et al.  Real-time object detection using dynamic principal component analysis , 2010, Proceedings of the XIII Internarional Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar.

[42]  Craig Warren,et al.  Numerical modelling and neural networks for landmine detection using ground penetrating radar , 2015, 2015 8th International Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar (IWAGPR).

[43]  Lara Pajewski,et al.  Verification of algorithm for point extraction from hyperbolic reflections in GPR data , 2017, 2017 9th International Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar (IWAGPR).

[44]  J. Pais,et al.  Assessment of moisture in road pavements , 2014, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar.

[45]  X. Derobert,et al.  Assessment of statistical-based clutter reduction techniques on ground-coupled GPR data for the detection of buried objects in soils , 2014, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar.

[46]  Huicai Xie,et al.  GPR measurement of the diameter of steel bars in concrete specimens based on the stationary wavelet transform , 2009 .

[47]  Francois Boone,et al.  Modelling dielectric-constant values of concrete: an aid to shielding effectiveness prediction and ground-penetrating radar wave technique interpretation , 2012 .

[48]  M. Solla,et al.  GPR for road inspection: Georeferencing and efficient approach to data processing and visualization , 2014, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar.

[49]  T. Hansen,et al.  Efficient Monte Carlo sampling of inverse problems using a neural network-based forward—applied to GPR crosshole traveltime inversion , 2017 .

[50]  Allen Taflove,et al.  Computational Electrodynamics the Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method , 1995 .

[51]  Zainah Ibrahim,et al.  Nondestructive test methods for concrete bridges: A review , 2016 .

[52]  A. P. Annan GPR—History, Trends, and Future Developments , 2002 .

[53]  Zoubaida Mechbal,et al.  Determination of concrete rebars characteristics by enhanced post-processing of GPR scan raw data , 2017 .

[54]  Craig Warren,et al.  Experimental and Modeled Performance of a Ground Penetrating Radar Antenna in Lossy Dielectrics , 2016, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.