Prevalence, impact, and predictive value of detecting subclinical coronary and carotid atherosclerosis in asymptomatic adults: the BioImage study.

[1]  P. Greenland,et al.  Coronary artery calcium score. , 2014, JAMA.

[2]  Jennifer G. Robinson,et al.  2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2014, Circulation.

[3]  D. Goff,et al.  Comparison of novel risk markers for improvement in cardiovascular risk assessment in intermediate-risk individuals. , 2012, JAMA.

[4]  Michael J Pencina,et al.  Quantifying discrimination of Framingham risk functions with different survival C statistics , 2012, Statistics in medicine.

[5]  Erling Falk,et al.  Carotid plaque burden as a measure of subclinical atherosclerosis: comparison with other tests for subclinical arterial disease in the High Risk Plaque BioImage study. , 2012, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[6]  Shunichi Homma,et al.  Warfarin and aspirin in patients with heart failure and sinus rhythm. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  Anne B. Newman,et al.  Framingham Risk Score and Alternatives for Prediction of Coronary Heart Disease in Older Adults , 2012, PloS one.

[8]  A. Hofman,et al.  Evaluation of Newer Risk Markers for Coronary Heart Disease Risk Classification , 2012, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[9]  J. Spence.  Carotid plaque measurement is superior to IMT Invited editorial comment on: carotid plaque, compared with carotid intima-media thickness, more accurately predicts coronary artery disease events: a meta-analysis-Yoichi Inaba, M.D., Jennifer A. Chen M.D., Steven R. Bergmann M.D., Ph.D. , 2012, Atherosclerosis.

[10]  Medicine,et al.  Calcified Atherosclerosis in Different Vascular Beds and the Risk of Mortality , 2012, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[11]  Steven R. Bergmann,et al.  Carotid plaque measurement is superior to IMT Invited editorial comment on: Carotid plaque, compared with carotid intima-media thickness, more accurately predicts coronary artery disease , 2012 .

[12]  A. Briggs,et al.  Effectiveness and cost effectiveness of cardiovascular disease prevention in whole populations: modelling study , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  Tom Wilsgaard,et al.  Carotid Plaque Area and Intima-Media Thickness in Prediction of First-Ever Ischemic Stroke: A 10-Year Follow-Up of 6584 Men and Women: The Tromsø Study , 2011, Stroke.

[14]  Ewout W Steyerberg,et al.  Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers , 2011, Statistics in medicine.

[15]  Klaus Mann,et al.  Coronary risk stratification, discrimination, and reclassification improvement based on quantification of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis: the Heinz Nixdorf Recall study. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  Roger Newson,et al.  Comparing the Predictive Powers of Survival Models Using Harrell's C or Somers’ D , 2010 .

[17]  V. Fuster,et al.  The BioImage Study: novel approaches to risk assessment in the primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease--study design and objectives. , 2010, American heart journal.

[18]  P. Greenland,et al.  Coronary artery calcium score and risk classification for coronary heart disease prediction. , 2010, JAMA.

[19]  Eric Boerwinkle,et al.  Carotid intima-media thickness and presence or absence of plaque improves prediction of coronary heart disease risk: the ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities) study. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  G. Bergström,et al.  Ultrasound-assessed plaque occurrence in the carotid and femoral arteries are independent predictors of cardiovascular events in middle-aged men during 10 years of follow-up. , 2010, Atherosclerosis.

[21]  N. Obuchowski,et al.  Assessing the Performance of Prediction Models: A Framework for Traditional and Novel Measures , 2010, Epidemiology.

[22]  V. Fuster,et al.  The CVD paradox: mortality vs prevalence , 2009, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[23]  R. Blumenthal,et al.  Limitations of the Framingham risk score are now much clearer. , 2009, Preventive medicine.

[24]  Saskia le Cessie,et al.  Use of Framingham risk score and new biomarkers to predict cardiovascular mortality in older people: population based observational cohort study , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[25]  Robert Beaglehole,et al.  Global public health: a scorecard , 2008, The Lancet.

[26]  W. Mack,et al.  Relation of Framingham risk score to subclinical atherosclerosis evaluated across three arterial sites. , 2008, The American journal of cardiology.

[27]  R. Sacco,et al.  Carotid plaque, a subclinical precursor of vascular events , 2008, Neurology.

[28]  M. Pencina,et al.  General Cardiovascular Risk Profile for Use in Primary Care: The Framingham Heart Study , 2008, Circulation.

[29]  Christopher B. Kendall,et al.  Use of carotid ultrasound to identify subclinical vascular disease and evaluate cardiovascular disease risk: a consensus statement from the American Society of Echocardiography Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Task Force. Endorsed by the Society for Vascular Medicine. , 2008, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[30]  M. Pencina,et al.  Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: From area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[31]  L. Kuller,et al.  Coronary artery calcium, carotid artery wall thickness, and cardiovascular disease outcomes in adults 70 to 99 years old. , 2008, The American journal of cardiology.

[32]  J. Alpert,et al.  Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction , 2008 .

[33]  J. Alpert,et al.  Universal definition of myocardial infarction. , 2007, European heart journal.

[34]  E. Vicaut,et al.  Mannheim Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Consensus (2004–2006) , 2006, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[35]  F. Kronenberg,et al.  Association of ankle-brachial index and plaques in the carotid and femoral arteries with cardiovascular events and total mortality in a population-based study with 13 years of follow-up. , 2006, European heart journal.

[36]  A. Hofman,et al.  Predictive Value of Noninvasive Measures of Atherosclerosis for Incident Myocardial Infarction: The Rotterdam Study , 2004, Circulation.

[37]  Sunil J Rao,et al.  Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis , 2003 .

[38]  J. David Spence,et al.  Carotid Plaque Area: A Tool for Targeting and Evaluating Vascular Preventive Therapy , 2002, Stroke.

[39]  R. D'Agostino,et al.  Validation of the Framingham coronary heart disease prediction scores: results of a multiple ethnic groups investigation. , 2001, JAMA.

[40]  Eary,et al.  CAROTID-ARTERY INTIMA AND MEDIA THICKNESS AS A RISK FACTOR FOR MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION AND STROKE IN OLDER ADULTS , 2000 .

[41]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Unstable angina: an etiologic approach to management. , 1998, Circulation.

[42]  D. Hosmer,et al.  A Simplified Method of Calculating an Overall Goodness-of-Fit Test for the Cox Proportional Hazards Model , 1998, Lifetime data analysis.

[43]  A. Zanchetti,et al.  Left ventricular concentric remodelling and carotid structural changes in essential hypertension , 1996, Journal of hypertension.

[44]  A. Simon,et al.  Carotid artery and left ventricular structural relationship in asymptomatic men at risk for cardiovascular disease. , 1996, Atherosclerosis.

[45]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Unstable angina. A classification. , 1989, Circulation.