Assessment of spatial attention after brain damage with a dynamic reaction time test

Lateralized spatial biases after brain damage are commonly assessed using batteries of paper-and-pencil tests. These tests hardly allow quantification of performance in different locations in space, and they tend to lose sensitivity along the course of recovery. We tested the dynamic Starry Night Test (SNT), a novel computerized test measuring reaction time and detection accuracy for visual target stimuli in a dynamic background, in 32 inpatients with right hemisphere stroke (RHS), 16 patients with left hemisphere stroke (LHS), and 9 healthy controls. As a group, only the RHS patients were significantly slower to respond to contralesional targets. Individually, 21 (66%) RHS patients and 5 (31%) LHS patients showed statistically significant contralateral deficits. In a number of RHS patients the SNT was more sensitive to the ipsilesional bias of spatial attention than the Behavioral Inattention Test (BIT), a standardized paper-and-pencil test battery of unilateral spatial neglect. Two illustrative case reports show that the dynamic SNT, but not the BIT, was sensitive to the spatial deficit in recovered patients, one of whom was involved in repeated car accidents. The SNT overcomes serious shortcomings of paper-and-pencil tests of unilateral neglect. It provides a simple quantitative tool for monitoring the natural and treatment-induced recovery of patients. (JINS, 2005, 11, 697–707.)Part of the data was presented in abstract form at the EBBS EuroConference on Cognitive and Neural Bases of Spatial Neglect, September 14–17, 2000, Como, Italy.

[1]  Ian H. Robertson,et al.  Unilateral Neglect: Clinical and Experimental Studies edited by Ian H. Robertson and John C. Marshall , 1994 .

[2]  R. Mayeux,et al.  Hemispatial neglect , 1989, Neurology.

[3]  B. Wilson,et al.  Factors affecting the clinical measurement of visuo-spatial neglect. , 1992, Behavioural neurology.

[4]  Laurel J Buxbaum,et al.  Treatments of unilateral neglect: a review. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[5]  Shaul Hochstein,et al.  Searching with Unilateral Neglect , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  Robert Knight,et al.  Grouping Influences in Unilateral Visual Neglect , 2003, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[7]  L. Chelazzi,et al.  Hemiretinal differences in speed of light detection in esotropic amblyopes , 1988, Vision Research.

[8]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  Using Reaction Time to Assess Patients With Unilateral Neglect and Extinction , 2002, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[9]  Carlo Umiltà,et al.  The Deployment of Visual Attention in the Intact Field of Hemineglect Patients , 1990, Cortex.

[10]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  Ian H. Robertson,et al.  Do We Need the “Lateral” in Unilateral Neglect? Spatially Nonselective Attention Deficits in Unilateral Neglect and Their Implications for Rehabilitation , 2001, NeuroImage.

[12]  Y. Sakashita Visual attentional disturbance with unilateral lesions in the basal ganglia and deep white matter , 1991, Annals of neurology.

[13]  M. Jeannerod Neurophysiological and neuropsychological aspects of spatial neglect. , 1987 .

[14]  Giuseppe Vallar,et al.  The Cognitive and Neural Bases of Spatial Neglect , 2002 .

[15]  Cynthia Owsley,et al.  Vision, attention, and self-reported driving behaviors in community-dwelling stroke survivors. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  G. Kinsella,et al.  Acute Recovery Patterns in Stroke Patients: Neuropsychological Factors , 1980, The Medical journal of Australia.

[17]  C Hershler,et al.  Visual neglect and extinction: a new test. , 1988, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[18]  C. Marzi,et al.  The spatial distribution of visual attention in hemineglect and extinction patients. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[19]  Roman von Wartburg,et al.  Residual oculomotor and exploratory deficits in patients with recovered hemineglect , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  I. Robertson Cognitive rehabilitation: attention and neglect , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  H. Karnath,et al.  Spatial orientation and the representation of space with parietal lobe lesions. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[22]  M. Posner,et al.  How do the parietal lobes direct covert attention? , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  Marlene Behrmann,et al.  Hemispatial Neglect and Visual Search: A Large Scale Analysis , 2004, Cortex.

[24]  Kenneth M. Heilman,et al.  Hemispace and Hemispatial Neglect , 1987 .

[25]  P. Diamond Rehabilitative management of post-stroke visuospatial inattention , 2001, Disability and rehabilitation.

[26]  B. Anderson,et al.  A mathematical model of line bisection behaviour in neglect. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[27]  Marcia Grabowecky,et al.  Preattentive Processes Guide Visual Search: Evidence from Patients with Unilateral Visual Neglect , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  Thomas Espeseth,et al.  Fast responses to neglected targets in visual search reflect pre-attentive processes: an exploration of response times in visual neglect , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  B. Wilson,et al.  Development of a behavioral test of visuospatial neglect. , 1987, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[30]  R T Knight,et al.  Cortical substrates supporting visual search in humans. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  Elisabetta Làdavas,et al.  Unilateral attention deficits and hemispheric asymmetries in the control of visual attention , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  G. Denes,et al.  Unilateral spatial neglect and recovery from hemiplegia: a follow-up study. , 1982, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[33]  C. Kennard,et al.  Impaired spatial working memory across saccades contributes to abnormal search in parietal neglect. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[34]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Selective Visual Attention and Visual Search: Behavioral and Neural Mechanisms , 2003 .

[35]  E. Làdavas,et al.  Is the hemispatial deficit produced by right parietal lobe damage associated with retinal or gravitational coordinates? , 1987, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[36]  I H Robertson Setting goals for cognitive rehabilitation. , 1999, Current opinion in neurology.

[37]  Ian Robertson,et al.  Early rightwards orienting of attention on simple reaction time performance in patients with left-sided neglect , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[38]  J. Ward Theory of Attention. , 1918 .

[39]  K. Seki,et al.  Diverse patterns of performance in copying and severity of unilateral spatial neglect , 2004, Journal of Neurology.

[40]  J-M Beis,et al.  Sensitivity of clinical and behavioural tests of spatial neglect after right hemisphere stroke , 2002, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[41]  HighWire Press Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London , 1781, The London Medical Journal.

[42]  C. Granger,et al.  The emerging science of functional assessment: our tool for outcomes analysis. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[43]  S. E. Black,et al.  Impaired visual search in patients with unilateral neglect: an oculographic analysis , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[44]  E Làdavas,et al.  Selective spatial attention in patients with visual extinction. , 1990, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[45]  F. Meneghello,et al.  Long-lasting amelioration of visuospatial neglect by prism adaptation. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[46]  J. Olver,et al.  Continuing issues in the assessment of neglect , 1995 .

[47]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  Visual Search Performance in the Neglect Syndrome , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[48]  H. Ring,et al.  Functional disability and rehabilitation outcome in right hemisphere damaged patients with and without unilateral spatial neglect. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[49]  J. Spatt,et al.  Double Dissociations between Neglect Tests: Possible Relation to Lesion Site , 2001, European Neurology.

[50]  B. Anderson,et al.  Mapping spatial attention with reaction time in neglect patients , 2002 .

[51]  W. Milberg,et al.  Preattentive and attentive visual search in individuals with hemispatial neglect. , 2000, Neuropsychology.

[52]  P. Halligan,et al.  Measuring visual neglect in acute stroke and predicting its recovery: the visual neglect recovery index. , 1992, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[53]  V. Mark Acute versus chronic functional aspects of unilateral spatial neglect. , 2003, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[54]  John C. Marshall,et al.  Left Visuo-Spatial Neglect: A Meaningless Entity? , 1992, Cortex.

[55]  K Sundet,et al.  To drive or not to drive: neuropsychological assessment for driver's license among stroke patients. , 1995, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[56]  R. Harvey,et al.  Recovery of functional status after right hemisphere stroke: relationship with unilateral neglect. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[57]  F. J. Friedrich,et al.  Spatial attention deficits in humans: a comparison of superior parietal and temporal-parietal junction lesions. , 1998, Neuropsychology.

[58]  J. André,et al.  Detection of visual field deficits and visual neglect with computerized light emitting diodes. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[59]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Visual Search for Feature and Conjunction Targets with an Attention Deficit , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[60]  F. J. Friedrich,et al.  Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[61]  R. Tallis,et al.  Reasons for variability in the reported rate of occurrence of unilateral spatial neglect after stroke. , 1999, Stroke.

[62]  A. Chatterjee,et al.  Variability not ability: another basis for performance decrements in neglect , 2000, Neuropsychologia.