DISCUSSING IMPLEMENTATION CHOICES FOR SERIOUS GAMES SUPPORTING SPATIAL AND ORIENTATION SKILLS

Games are widely considered effective educational tools. They have been profitably adopted to foster the learning of a variety of educational subjects and to sustain the development of those horizontal, cross-disciplinary, non-subject-based competences that are commonly defined as key or transversal skills. Spatial Intelligence (which actually refers to a set of competences involving space awareness and self-perception in space) is included among the basic transversal skills underpinning a variety of cognitive tasks and is a prerequisite for autonomous mobility. Relevant scientific studies show that people can improve their spatial skills with appropriate training and a variety of experiments shows that both adults and children, after a short training have significantly improved their ability in this area. In this line, two games were developed with the aim of sustaining the development of spatial and orientation skills of people cognitive impairments. One game is oriented to the comprehension of the terms and the concepts of right/left, with the overall goal of helping cognitive disabled people to be able to understand and follow simple instructions while moving around town. The other one is aimed at exercising “perspective-taking” skills: the ability of identifying the position and the orientation of other people in the space and understanding that their perspective can be different from our own . Specific choices (both technological and pedagogical) directly linked to the “special needs” of the target population have guided the implementation of the games, which, nevertheless, can also be adopted in mainstream primary education.

[1]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. , 2009 .

[2]  P. Sturmey.  Cognitive therapy with people with intellectual disabilities: a selective review and critique , 2004 .

[3]  S. Gori,et al.  A Causal Link between Visual Spatial Attention and Reading Acquisition , 2012, Current Biology.

[4]  Jeffrey Earp,et al.  Learning through Playing for or against Each Other? Promoting Collaborative Learning in Digital Game Based Learning , 2012, ECIS.

[5]  Jeffrey Earp,et al.  Hot Issues in Game Enhanced Learning: The GEL Viewpoint , 2012, VS-GAMES.

[6]  N. Newcombe,et al.  Early Education for Spatial Intelligence: Why, What, and How , 2010 .

[7]  David Tzuriel,et al.  Gender differences in spatial ability of young children: the effects of training and processing strategies. , 2010, Child development.

[8]  Susan M. Baum,et al.  Meeting the Needs of Learning Disabled Gifted Students. , 1984 .

[9]  Michela Ott,et al.  Accessibility of Educational Multimedia: in search of specific standards , 2006, iJET.

[10]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  DESIGNING LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS THAT EXCITE SERIOUS PLAY , 2001 .

[11]  J. Pratt,et al.  Playing an Action Video Game Reduces Gender Differences in Spatial Cognition , 2007, Psychological science.

[12]  D. Krathwohl.  A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview , 2002 .

[13]  H. Gardner,et al.  Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences , 1983 .

[14]  K. Thompson.  Cognitive and Analytical Psychology Howard Gardner .Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York, Basic Books, 1983. , 1985 .