User involvement in service delivery predicts outcomes of assistive technology use: A cross-sectional study in Bangladesh

BackgroundKnowledge about the relation between user involvement in the provision of assistive technology and outcomes of assistive technology use is a prerequisite for the development of efficient service delivery strategies. However, current knowledge is limited, particularly from low-income countries where affordability is an issue. The objective was therefore to explore the relation between outcomes of assistive technology use and user involvement in the service delivery process in Bangladesh.MethodsUsing structured interviews, data from 136 users of hearing aids and 149 users of manual wheelchairs were collected. Outcomes were measured using the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA), which was adapted for wheelchair users. Predictors of user involvement included preference, measurement and training.ResultsUsers reported outcomes comparable to those found in other high- and low-income countries. User involvement increased the likelihood for reporting better outcomes except for measurement among hearing aid users.ConclusionsThe findings support the provision of assistive technology as a strategy to improve the participation of people with disabilities in society. They also support current policies and guidelines for user-involvement in the service delivery process. Simplified strategies for provision of hearing aids may be explored.

[1]  S. Kramer,et al.  International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): results from the Netherlands: El Inventario Internacional de Resultados para Auxiliares Auditivos (IOI-HA): resultados en los Países Bajos , 2002, International journal of audiology.

[2]  W. Noble.  Extending the IOI to significant others and to non-hearing-aid-based interventions. , 2002, International journal of audiology.

[3]  Redwanur M Rahman,et al.  Human rights, health and the state in Bangladesh , 2006, BMC international health and human rights.

[4]  A. Williams,et al.  International classification of functioning, disability, and health: ICF-CY World Health Organization , 2013 .

[5]  Dermot Foley,et al.  Poverty, Social Exclusion and the Politics of Disability: Care as a Social Good and the Expenditure of Social Capital in Chuadanga, Bangladesh , 2007 .

[6]  L. D. de Witte,et al.  Existing models and instruments for the selection of assistive technology in rehabilitation practice , 2009, Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy.

[7]  A. Olaogun,et al.  Effects of mothers' socio-economic status on the management of febrile conditions in their under five children in a resource limited setting , 2006, BMC international health and human rights.

[8]  A. Parant.  [World population prospects]. , 1990, Futuribles.

[9]  B. McPherson,et al.  A Fair Hearing for All , 2004 .

[10]  Anna Lindström,et al.  Assistive technology in developing countries: national and international responsibilities to implement the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities , 2009, The Lancet.

[11]  Philomena Joseph,et al.  A STUDY ON CERTAIN FACTORS INFLUENCING LANGUAGE PERFORMANCE OF HEARING IMPAIRED STUDENTS , 2003 .

[12]  M. Scherer,et al.  The relationship of personal factors and subjective well-being to the use of assistive technology devices , 2011, Disability and rehabilitation.

[13]  Oleg O Bilukha,et al.  Methods for health surveys in difficult settings: charting progress, moving forward , 2007, Emerging Themes in Epidemiology.

[14]  L H Kraskowsky,et al.  Factors affecting older adults' use of adaptive equipment: review of the literature. , 2001, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[15]  Amalendu Samanta,et al.  Wheelchair charity: A useless benevolence in community-based rehabilitation , 2005, Disability and rehabilitation.

[16]  G. Hosain,et al.  Impact of disability on quality of life of rural disabled people in Bangladesh. , 2002, Journal of health, population, and nutrition.

[17]  M. Scherer.  The change in emphasis from people to person: introduction to the special issue on Assistive Technology , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[18]  S. Kramer,et al.  Translations of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): Traducciones del Inventario Internacional de Resultados para Auxiliares Auditivos (IOI-HA) , 2002, International journal of audiology.

[19]  Jay K. Martin,et al.  The impact of consumer involvement on satisfaction with and use of assistive technology , 2011, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[20]  Bruce J. Reed,et al.  Empowerment and Assistive Technology: The Local Resource Team Model , 1995 .

[21]  S L Matsen,et al.  A closer look at amputees in Vietnam: A field survey of Vietnamese using prostheses , 1999, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[22]  S. Shore,et al.  Use of an economical wheelchair in India and Peru: impact on health and function. , 2008, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[23]  J. Pearlman,et al.  Lower-limb prostheses and wheelchairs in low-income countries [An Overview] , 2008, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[24]  Zaid Chalabi,et al.  Optimization of household survey sampling without sample frames. , 2006, International journal of epidemiology.

[25]  J. Klugman.  Human Development Report 2009. Overcoming Barriers: Human Mobility and Development , 2009 .

[26]  Bernadette McSherry,et al.  The United Nations Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. , 2008, Journal of law and medicine.

[27]  B. Olusanya.  Self-reported outcomes of aural rehabilitation in a developing country , 2004, International journal of audiology.

[28]  Dafydd Stephens.  The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) and its relationship to the Client-oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI): El Inventario Internacional de Resultados para Auxiliares Auditivos (IOI-HA) y su relatiócute;n con la Escala de Mejoría Orientada hacia el Cliente (COSI) , 2002, International journal of audiology.

[29]  Timothy L Lash,et al.  Risk factor studies of age-at-onset in a sample ascertained for Parkinson disease affected sibling pairs: a cautionary tale. , 2007, Emerging themes in epidemiology.

[30]  M. T. J. Buñuales,et al.  La clasificación internacional del funcionamiento de la discapacidad y de la salud (CIF) 2001 , 2002 .

[31]  Oliver Lewis,et al.  United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities , 2007, International Legal Materials.

[32]  J. Panel.  Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities , 2013 .

[33]  Michael A Babyak,et al.  What You See May Not Be What You Get: A Brief, Nontechnical Introduction to Overfitting in Regression-Type Models , 2004, Psychosomatic medicine.