Multi Criteria Method for Determining the Failure Resistance of Information System Components

The study is devoted to determining the level of failure resistance of the components of an information system in order to increase the reliability of the most vulnerable components. A multi-criteria method is proposed for determining the fault tolerance of information system components. Information system components act as alternatives. Alternatives are described by a set of criteria. Each criteria has its own direction of optimization and a unit of measurement. To obtain comparable scales of criteria values, normalization was done. The estimation of additional coefficients is made. The criteria weights are determined on the basis of expert estimates.

[1]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Jalil Heidary Dahooie,et al.  Competency‐based IT personnel selection using a hybrid SWARA and ARAS‐G methodology , 2018 .

[3]  Yerzhan Seitkulov,et al.  A Software System for Risk Management of Information Systems* , 2018, 2018 IEEE 12th International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies (AICT).

[4]  Jurgita Antucheviciene,et al.  Measuring Performance in Transportation Companies in Developing Countries: A Novel Rough ARAS Model , 2018, Symmetry.

[5]  Robert Stone,et al.  The risk in early design method , 2009 .

[6]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision‐making , 2010 .

[7]  Alev Taskin Gumus,et al.  A comprehensive review of multi criteria decision making approaches based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets , 2015, Knowl. Based Syst..

[8]  Taufiq Immawan,et al.  Operational risk analysis with Fuzzy FMEA (Failure Mode and Effect Analysis) approach (Case study: Optimus Creative Bandung) , 2018 .

[9]  Cassandra C. Elrod,et al.  Identifying Risk at the Conceptual Product Design Phase: A Web-Based Software Solution and Its Evaluation , 2012 .

[10]  Dragisa Stanujkic,et al.  New group decision-making ARCAS approach based on the integration of the SWARA and the ARAS methods adapted for negotiations , 2017 .

[11]  Seilkhan Boranbayev,et al.  Methods of Ensuring the Reliability and Fault Tolerance of Information Systems , 2018, ITNG 2018.

[12]  Dragan Pamucar,et al.  A New Model for Determining Weight Coefficients of Criteria in MCDM Models: Full Consistency Method (FUCOM) , 2018, Symmetry.

[13]  Katie Grantham,et al.  Failure Prevention Through the Cataloging of Successful Risk Mitigation Strategies , 2013, Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention.

[14]  Daniela Fuchs-Hanusch,et al.  A bibliometric-based survey on AHP and TOPSIS techniques , 2017, Expert Syst. Appl..

[15]  Seilkhan Boranbayev,et al.  The Modern State and the Further Development Prospects of Information Security in the Republic of Kazakhstan , 2018, ITNG 2018.

[16]  İhsan Kaya,et al.  Prioritizing failures by using hybrid multi criteria decision making methodology with a real case application , 2019, Sustainable Cities and Society.

[17]  Irem Y. Tumer,et al.  Prescribing and Implementing the Risk in Early Design (RED) Method , 2006 .

[18]  Seilkhan Boranbayev,et al.  Development of a Software System to Ensure the Reliability and Fault Tolerance in Information Systems Based on Expert Estimates , 2018, IntelliSys.

[19]  Ying Li,et al.  Evaluation of Sustainability Information Disclosure Based on Entropy , 2018, Entropy.

[20]  Muhamad Zameri Mat Saman,et al.  A systematic review and meta-Analysis of SWARA and WASPAS methods: Theory and applications with recent fuzzy developments , 2017, Appl. Soft Comput..

[21]  James J. H. Liou,et al.  A novel multiple-criteria decision-making-based FMEA model for risk assessment , 2018, Appl. Soft Comput..

[22]  Zenonas Turskis,et al.  A Fuzzy WASPAS-Based Approach to Determine Critical Information Infrastructures of EU Sustainable Development , 2019, Sustainability.

[23]  Askar Boranbayev,et al.  Software Architecture for In-House Development of a Student Web Portal for Higher Education Institution in Kazakhstan , 2018, ITNG 2018.

[24]  Irem Y. Tumer,et al.  The Risk in Early Design (RED) Method: Likelihood and Consequence Formulations , 2006, DAC 2006.

[25]  Irem Y. Tumer,et al.  Risk Assessment in Early Software Design Based on the Software Function-Failure Design Method , 2007, 31st Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC 2007).

[26]  Zenonas Turskis,et al.  A New Fuzzy Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach to Solve Personnel Assessment Problems. Case Study: Director Selection for Estates and Economy Office , 2017 .

[27]  E. Zavadskas,et al.  Multi-criteria Optimization System for Decision Making in Construction Design and Management , 2009 .

[28]  Seilkhan Boranbayev,et al.  Development of a software system to ensure the reliability and fault tolerance in information systems , 2018 .

[29]  Askar Boranbayev,et al.  Implementation of Security Systems for Prevention of Loss of Information at Organizations of Higher Education , 2015, 2015 12th International Conference on Information Technology - New Generations.

[30]  Yong Deng,et al.  A hybrid intelligent model for assessment of critical success factors in high-risk emergency system , 2018, Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing.

[31]  Irem Y. Tumer,et al.  Implementation Procedures for the Risk in Early Design (RED) Method , 2008 .

[32]  Fatih Ecer,et al.  An integrated Fuzzy AHP and ARAS model to evaluate mobile banking services , 2017 .