Introducing passive matched field acoustic tomography

In acoustic tomography sea-basin environmental parameters such as temperature profiles and current-velocities are derived, when ray propagation models are adopted, by the travel time estimates relative to the identifiable ray paths. The transmitted signals are either single frequency, or impulsive, or intermittent and deterministic. When the wavelength is comparable with the scale lengths present in the propagation scenario, Matched Field Tomography (MFT) is used, entailing the consideration of waveguide modes instead of rays. A new concept in tomography is introduced in the paper, that employs passively the noise emitted by ships of opportunity (cargoes, ferries) as source signals. The passive technique is acoustic-pollution-free, and if a basin is selected in which a regular ship traffic occurs data can be received on a regular schedule, with no transmission cost. A novel array pre-processor for passive tomography is introduced, such that the signal structure at the pre-processor output is nearly the same as that obtainable in the case of single-frequency source signals. Hence, at the pre-processor output all the tomographic inversion methods valid for active tomography employing single-frequency sources can be applied. The differences between active and passive tomography are pointed out and the potential of passive techniques is illustrated by simple propagation scenarios adopting either rays or waveguide modes.

[1]  T. C. Yang Effectiveness of mode filtering: A comparison of matched‐field and matched‐mode processing , 1990 .

[2]  I. Miller Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes , 1966 .

[3]  Bruno O. Shubert,et al.  Random variables and stochastic processes , 1979 .

[4]  Hong Wang,et al.  Coherent signal-subspace processing for the detection and estimation of angles of arrival of multiple wide-band sources , 1985, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[5]  Kenneth E. Hawker A normal mode theory of acoustic Doppler effects in the oceanic waveguide , 1979 .

[6]  T. C. Yang,et al.  Comparative performance of matched‐mode and matched‐field localization in a range‐dependent environment , 1992 .

[7]  Otello Gasparini,et al.  Preliminary comparison between two spectral array pre-processors for wideband beamforming , 1995, 1995 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[8]  E. C. Shang,et al.  Ocean acoustic tomography based on adiabatic mode theory , 1989 .

[9]  E. Shang,et al.  Tomographic inversion of the El Nino profile by using a matched-mode processing (MMP) method , 1994 .

[10]  Leonid M. Brekhovskikh,et al.  Mechanics Of Continua And Wave Dynamics , 1993 .

[11]  T. C. Yang A method of range and depth estimation by modal decomposition , 1987 .

[12]  P. Traykovski Travel‐time perturbations due to internal waves: Equivalence of modal and ray solutions , 1996 .

[13]  Sergio M. Jesus Normal‐mode matching localization in shallow water: Environmental and system effects , 1991 .

[14]  W. Munk,et al.  Ocean acoustic tomography: Rays and modes , 1983 .

[15]  M. Buckingham Ocean-acoustic propagation models , 1992 .

[16]  Arthur B. Baggeroer,et al.  An overview of matched field methods in ocean acoustics , 1993 .

[17]  James H. Miller,et al.  Acoustic travel-time perturbations due to shallow-water internal waves and internal tides in the Barents Sea Polar Front: Theory and experiment , 1996 .

[19]  W A Kuperman,et al.  Focalization: environmental focusing and source localization. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  M. Morf,et al.  The signal subspace approach for multiple wide-band emitter location , 1983 .