Exploring the role of smartphone technology for citizen science in agriculture

Citizen science is the involvement of citizens, such as farmers, in the research process. Citizen science has become increasingly popular recently, supported by the proliferation of mobile communication technologies such as smartphones. However, citizen science methodologies have not yet been widely adopted in agricultural research. Here, we conducted an online survey with 57 British and French farmers in 2014. We investigated (1) farmer ownership and use of smartphone technologies, (2) farmer use of farm-specific management apps, and (3) farmer interest and willingness to participate in agricultural citizen science projects. Our results show that 89 % respondents owned a smartphone, 84 % used it for farm management, and 72 % used it on a daily basis. Fifty-nine percent engaged with farm-specific apps, using on average four apps. Ninety-three percent respondents agreed that citizen science was a useful methodology for data collection, 93 % for real-time monitoring, 83 % for identification of research questions, 72 % for experimental work, and 72 % for wildlife recording. Farmers also showed strong interest to participate in citizen science projects, often willing to commit substantial amounts of time. For example, 54 % of British respondents were willing to participate in farmland wildlife recording once a week or monthly. Although financial support was not always regarded as necessary, experimental work was the most likely activity for which respondents thought financial support would be essential. Overall, this is the first study to quantify and explore farmers’ use of smartphones for farm management, and document strong support for farm-based citizen science projects.

[1]  J. Silvertown A new dawn for citizen science. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[2]  Elizabeth Canales,et al.  Investigating the Human Dimension of Weed Management: New Tools of the Trade , 2010 .

[3]  David N. Bonter,et al.  Citizen Science as an Ecological Research Tool: Challenges and Benefits , 2010 .

[4]  Jacob van Etten,et al.  Crowdsourcing Crop Improvement in Sub‐Saharan Africa: A Proposal for a Scalable and Inclusive Approach to Food Security , 2011 .

[5]  A. Schloss,et al.  Using mobile phones to engage citizen scientists in research , 2011 .

[6]  Justin J. Henriques,et al.  Empowering Smallholders and Local Food Markets with Smartphones and Social Networks , 2012, 2012 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference.

[7]  Richard Inger,et al.  Smartphones in ecology and evolution: a guide for the app-rehensive , 2013, Ecology and evolution.

[8]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[9]  Alex Singleton,et al.  Broadband speed equity: A new digital divide? , 2014 .

[10]  Bruce Pearce,et al.  Duchy Originals Future Farming Programme – A practical, farmer led approach to innovation , 2014 .

[11]  Timos Papadopoulos,et al.  Emerging technologies for biological recording , 2015 .

[12]  Quentin Groom,et al.  Trying to engage the crowd in recording invasive alien species in Europe: experiences from two smartphone applications in northwest Europe , 2015 .

[13]  Michael J. O. Pocock,et al.  Ecological monitoring with citizen science: the design and implementation of schemes for recording plants in Britain and Ireland , 2015 .

[14]  Suporn Pongnumkul,et al.  Applications of Smartphone-Based Sensors in Agriculture: A Systematic Review of Research , 2015, J. Sensors.

[15]  E. Bos,et al.  Virtual reconnection: The online spaces of alternative food networks in England , 2016 .