The Relative Impact of Anger and Efficacy on Collective Action is Affected by Feelings of Fear

Two well-established predictors of collective action are perceptions of group efficacy and feelings of anger. The current research investigates the extent to which the relative impact of these variables differs when fear is or is not also included as a predictor of collective action. The results of two experiments indicate that when fear is not assessed, the importance of anger as a predictor of action is underestimated while the importance of group efficacy is overestimated. The results further indicate that fear, in addition to affecting the impact of known causes of collective action (anger and group efficacy), is a powerful inhibitor of collective action. The implications for current theoretical models of collective action instigators are discussed.

[1]  G. L. Bon,et al.  Scientific Literature: The Crowd. A Study of the Popular Mind , 1897 .

[2]  C. Mcphail,et al.  Civil disorder participation: a critical examination of recent research. , 1971, American sociological review.

[3]  Isaac Kraminick.  Reflections on Revolution: Definition and Explanation in Recent Scholarship , 1972 .

[4]  F. Crosby,et al.  A model of egoistical relative deprivation. , 1976 .

[5]  J. D. McCarthy,et al.  Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  K. Tierney,et al.  Relative Deprivation and Social Movements: A Critical Look at Twenty Years of Theory and Research* , 1981 .

[7]  S. Fiske,et al.  Social Psychology , 2019, Definitions.

[8]  Serge Guimond,et al.  Relative deprivation theory and the Quebec nationalist movement: The cognition–emotion distinction and the personal–group deprivation issue. , 1983 .

[9]  Faye J. Crosby,et al.  The Denial of Personal Discrimination , 1984 .

[10]  P. Brickman,et al.  Moral outrage and pragmatism: Explanations for collective action ☆ , 1984 .

[11]  T. Pettigrew,et al.  Relative deprivation theory: An overview and conceptual critique , 1984 .

[12]  Ira J. Roseman.  Cognitive determinants of emotion: A structural theory. , 1984 .

[13]  R. Folger,et al.  Responses to relative deprivation: A conceptual framework. , 1984 .

[14]  Richard S. Hallam,et al.  Fearlessness and courage: A replication experiment , 1985 .

[15]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  F. Tougas.  The influence of identification, collective relative deprivation, and procedure of implementation on women's response to affirmative action: A causal modeling approach. , 1988 .

[17]  B. Klandermans.  Grievance interpretation and success expectations: the social construction of protest , 1989 .

[18]  Donald M. Taylor,et al.  Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group : from acceptance to collective protest , 1990 .

[19]  R. Lazarus.  Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion. , 1991, The American psychologist.

[20]  R. Lazarus,et al.  In search of the "hot" cognitions: attributions, appraisals, and their relation to emotion. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  L. Fitzgerald,et al.  No Safe Haven: Male Violence Against Women at Home, at Work, and in the Community , 1994 .

[22]  Rupert Brown,et al.  From ethnocentrism to collective protest: Responses to relative deprivation and threats to social identity. , 1995 .

[23]  J. Feagin,et al.  Living with Racism: The Black Middle-Class Experience , 1995 .

[24]  Robin M. Kowalski,et al.  Complaints and complaining: functions, antecedents, and consequences. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  Bertjan Doosje,et al.  Sticking Together or Falling Apart: In-Group Identification as a Psychological Determinant of Group Commitment Versus Individual Mobility , 1997 .

[26]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[27]  Stephen C. Wright.  Ambiguity, Social Influence, and Collective Action: Generating Collective Protest in Response to Tokenism , 1997 .

[28]  Jacquelien van Stekelenburg,et al.  The social psychology of protest , 1997 .

[29]  Z. Kunda,et al.  Social Cognition: Making Sense of People , 1999 .

[30]  Janet K. Swim,et al.  Excuse me : What did you just say?! : Women's public and private responses to sexist remarks , 1999 .

[31]  Linda R. Tropp,et al.  Ingroup identification and relative deprivation : an examination across multiple social comparisons , 1999 .

[32]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Intergroup emotions: explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  A. Bandura.  Exercise of Human Agency Through Collective Efficacy , 2000 .

[34]  Iain Walker,et al.  Relative Deprivation: Specification, Development, and Integration , 2001 .

[35]  Cheryl R. Kaiser,et al.  Stop Complaining! The Social Costs of Making Attributions to Discrimination , 2001 .

[36]  Linda R. Tropp,et al.  Collective Action in Response to Disadvantage: Intergroup Perceptions, Social Identification, and Social Change , 2001 .

[37]  Charles Stangor,et al.  Reporting discrimination in public and private contexts. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  L. Cortina,et al.  The (un)reasonableness of reporting: antecedents and consequences of reporting sexual harassment. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[39]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[40]  Russell Spears,et al.  Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[41]  Heather J. Smith,et al.  Group-based Emotions and Intergroup Behavior: The Case of Relative Deprivation. , 2004 .

[42]  D. Mackinnon,et al.  Equivalence of the Mediation, Confounding and Suppression Effect , 2000, Prevention Science.

[43]  N. Branscombe,et al.  Perceivers’ Responses to In-Group and Out-Group Members Who Blame a Negative Outcome on Discrimination , 2005, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[44]  C. Judd,et al.  When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[45]  Anne O'Brien,et al.  Why do people engage in collective action? Revisiting the role of perceived effectiveness , 2006 .

[46]  B. Mesquita,et al.  The experience of emotion. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[47]  Geoffrey W. Sutton.  Positive Psychology: The Scientific and Practical Explorations of Human Strengths , 2007 .

[48]  T. Postmes,et al.  Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: a quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. , 2008, Psychological bulletin.

[49]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[50]  Thomas Kessler,et al.  Anger, Fear, or Sadness: Faculty Members' Emotional Reactions to Collective Pay Disadvantage , 2008 .