Tolerance analysis using skin model shapes and linear complementarity conditions

Abstract The aim of tolerance analysis is to find a balance between manufacturing cost and product geometric quality. Earlier research usually considered ideal surface-based deviation models to conduct simulations, which ignore form defects. With the increasing demands on quality control, a skin model shape that includes form defects has its advantages. First, the effects of the chosen geometrical model on the assembly simulation are analyzed; the geometrical models considered are: nominal model, ideal surface-based deviation model, and skin model shape. The importance of form defects and assembly load conditions is highlighted. However, it is not easy to integrate all these factors into tolerance analysis. Difficulties in assembly simulation are discussed, such as the mating between non-ideal surfaces, model balance under external and internal loads, the consistency of simulation results, etc. Based on the analysis, a skin model shape-based tolerance analysis method, which also considers the load and displacement boundary conditions, is proposed. The assembly of the skin model shape is transformed into the objective function of a quadratic optimization problem, links between physical properties and optimization constraints are established. Corresponding simulation results are generated by conducting the optimization iteratively. To illustrate the method and validate its simulation result, various models are used as examples. Lastly, a simplified hand saw model is used as a case study.

[1]  Bharat Bhushan,et al.  Generalized fractal analysis and its applications to engineering surfaces , 1995 .

[2]  Aristides A. G. Requicha,et al.  Toward a Theory of Geometric Tolerancing , 1983 .

[3]  Junkang Guo,et al.  Integration of geometric variation and part deformation into variation propagation of 3-D assemblies , 2016 .

[4]  Liu Ting,et al.  Assembly Error Calculation with Consideration of Part Deformation , 2016 .

[5]  Nabil Anwer,et al.  A Discrete Geometry Framework for Geometrical Product Specifications , 2011 .

[6]  Rikard Söderberg,et al.  Using Morphing Techniques in Early Variation Analysis , 2014, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[7]  Jean-Yves Dantan,et al.  Geometrical product specifications - model for product life cycle , 2008, Comput. Aided Des..

[8]  BING LI,et al.  Relative positioning of toleranced polyhedral parts in an assembly , 2001 .

[9]  Pierre-Antoine Adragna,et al.  Modeling of 2D and 3D Assemblies Taking Into Account Form Errors of Plane Surfaces , 2009, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[10]  Nabil Anwer,et al.  A novel representation method of non-ideal surface morphologies and its application in shaft-hole sealing simulation analysis , 2019 .

[11]  Antonio Armillotta Tolerance Analysis Considering form Errors in Planar Datum Features , 2016 .

[12]  S. Jack Hu,et al.  Variation simulation for deformable sheet metal assemblies using finite element methods , 1997 .

[13]  Xiaoli Qiu,et al.  Assembly sequence optimization for minimizing the riveting path and overall dimensional error , 2018 .

[14]  Denis Teissandier,et al.  Operations on polytopes: application to tolerance analysis , 2011, ArXiv.

[15]  Rikard Söderberg,et al.  Toward a Digital Twin for real-time geometry assurance in individualized production , 2017 .

[16]  Wilma Polini,et al.  Manufacturing Signature for Tolerance Analysis , 2015, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[17]  Denis Teissandier,et al.  Applying screw theory for summing sets of constraints in geometric tolerancing , 2017 .

[18]  Sandro Wartzack,et al.  Approaches for the assembly simulation of skin model shapes , 2015, Comput. Aided Des..

[19]  Wenzhen Huang,et al.  Mode-based Decomposition of Part Form Error by Discrete-Cosine-Transform with Implementation to Assembly and Stamping System with Compliant Parts , 2002 .

[20]  Li Bo,et al.  Geometrical Simulation of Multiscale Toleranced Surface With Consideration of the Tolerancing Principle , 2015 .

[21]  Pasquale Franciosa,et al.  Simulation of variational compliant assemblies with shape errors based on morphing mesh approach , 2011 .

[22]  Robert Scott Pierce,et al.  A Method for Integrating Form Errors Into Geometric Tolerance Analysis , 2005, DAC 2005.

[23]  David H. Evans,et al.  Statistical Tolerancing: The State of the Art, Part I. Background , 1974 .

[24]  Sandro Wartzack,et al.  Discrete shape modeling for skin model representation , 2013 .

[25]  Giovanni Moroni,et al.  Manufacturing signature and operating conditions in a variational model for tolerance analysis of rigid assemblies , 2017 .

[26]  A. Clément,et al.  A dimensioning and tolerancing assistance model for CAD/CAM systems , 1994 .

[27]  Valtteri Tuominen Validating the virtual clamp with CMM correlation on automotive production lines , 2017 .

[28]  Xingyu Yan,et al.  Generation of consistent skin model shape based on FEA method , 2017 .

[29]  Lazhar Homri,et al.  Geometrical variations management for additive manufactured product , 2017 .

[30]  Lazhar Homri,et al.  Tolerance analysis - Form defects modeling and simulation by modal decomposition and optimization , 2017, Comput. Aided Des..

[31]  Vincent Richefeu,et al.  Contact dynamics as a nonsmooth discrete element method , 2009 .

[32]  Spencer P. Magleby,et al.  Generalized 3-D tolerance analysis of mechanical assemblies with small kinematic adjustments , 1998 .

[33]  Doriane Gouyou,et al.  Tolerance analysis of overconstrained and flexible assemblies by polytopes and finite element computations: application to a flange , 2017, Research in Engineering Design.

[34]  Arnab Banerjee,et al.  Historical Origin and Recent Development on Normal Directional Impact Models for Rigid Body Contact Simulation: A Critical Review , 2017 .

[35]  Evan Drumwright,et al.  A Fast and Stable Penalty Method for Rigid Body Simulation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[36]  Hugo Falgarone,et al.  Variation Simulation During Assembly of Non-rigid Components. Realistic Assembly Simulation with ANATOLEFLEX Software , 2016 .

[37]  Chris Evans,et al.  Precision engineering : an evolutionary view , 1989 .

[38]  Yanlong Cao,et al.  A comprehensive review of tolerance analysis models , 2018 .

[39]  Alex Ballu,et al.  A scientific point of view of a simple industrial tolerancing process , 2011 .

[40]  Darek Ceglarek,et al.  Physics-driven shape variation modelling at early design stage , 2016 .

[41]  Sandro Wartzack,et al.  Contact and Mobility Simulation for Mechanical Assemblies Based on Skin Model Shapes , 2015, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[42]  Jody Muelaner,et al.  A new paradigm in large-scale assembly—research priorities in measurement assisted assembly , 2014 .

[43]  Alex Attridge,et al.  Moving towards in-line metrology: evaluation of a Laser Radar system for in-line dimensional inspection for automotive assembly systems , 2017 .

[44]  Serge Samper,et al.  Form Defects Tolerancing by Natural Modes Analysis , 2007, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[45]  Serge Samper,et al.  Modal Expression of Form Defects , 2007 .

[46]  Bernard Rolfe,et al.  The kernel density estimate/point distribution model (KDE-PDM) for statistical shape modeling of automotive stampings and assemblies , 2010 .

[47]  Jean-François Fontaine,et al.  Modeling of interference fits taking form defects of the surfaces in contact into account , 2011 .

[48]  Sandro Wartzack,et al.  A Concept for the Consideration of Dimensional and Geometrical Deviations in the Evaluation of the Internal Clearance of Roller Bearings , 2016 .

[49]  Jean-Yves Dantan,et al.  Statistical tolerance analysis of bevel gear by tooth contact analysis and Monte Carlo simulation , 2007 .

[50]  Sandro Wartzack,et al.  Skin Model Shapes: A new paradigm shift for geometric variations modelling in mechanical engineering , 2014, Comput. Aided Des..

[51]  Min Hu,et al.  Simulation and analysis of assembly processes considering compliant, non-ideal parts and tooling variations , 2001 .

[52]  Nabil Anwer,et al.  The skin model, a comprehensive geometric model for engineering design , 2013 .

[53]  Alain Desrochers,et al.  Application of a Unified Jacobian-Torsor Model for Tolerance Analysis , 2003, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[54]  David C. Gossard,et al.  Modeling the assembly of compliant, non-ideal parts , 1997, Comput. Aided Des..

[55]  Zhihua Zou,et al.  A gap-based approach to capture fitting conditions for mechanical assembly , 2004, Comput. Aided Des..

[56]  K. D. Summerhays,et al.  Methods for evaluation of systematic geometric deviations in machined parts and their relationships to process variables , 1999 .

[57]  Xin Jin,et al.  A novel modelling method of geometric errors for precision assembly , 2018 .

[58]  Qiang Huang,et al.  Machine learning in tolerancing for additive manufacturing , 2018 .

[59]  Inna Sharf,et al.  Literature survey of contact dynamics modelling , 2002 .

[60]  Rikard Söderberg,et al.  Statistical shape modeling in virtual assembly using PCA-technique , 2013 .

[61]  P. Fettke,et al.  Industry 4.0 , 2014, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[62]  Min Zhang,et al.  Geometric Product Specification of Gears: The GeoSpelling Perspective☆ , 2015 .

[63]  Joseph K. Davidson,et al.  A New Mathematical Model for Geometric Tolerances as Applied to Round Faces , 2002 .

[64]  Serge Samper,et al.  On the role of form defects in assemblies subject to local deformations and mechanical loads , 2012, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[65]  Hoai-Nam Le,et al.  Experimental and Theoretical Investigations of Mechanical Joints With Form Defects , 2014, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[66]  M. Anitescu,et al.  Formulating Dynamic Multi-Rigid-Body Contact Problems with Friction as Solvable Linear Complementarity Problems , 1997 .

[67]  Alex Ballu,et al.  A Model for a Coherent and Complete Tolerancing Process , 2007 .

[68]  Maxence Bigerelle,et al.  Multiscale roughness analysis of engineering surfaces: A comparison of methods for the investigation of functional correlations , 2016 .

[69]  Jean-Yves Dantan,et al.  Formal Language for GeoSpelling , 2015, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[70]  Arthur Bender Statistical Tolerancing as it Relates to Quality Control and the Designer (6 times 2.5 = 9) , 1968 .

[71]  Robert Scott Pierce,et al.  Simulation of Mating Between Nonanalytic Surfaces Using a Mathematical Programing Formulation , 2007, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[72]  Antoine Tahan,et al.  CAD/Tolerancing integration: Mechanical assembly with form defects , 2017, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[73]  Serge Samper,et al.  Form Errors Impact in a Rotating Plane Surface Assembly , 2013 .

[74]  Nabil Anwer,et al.  An Improved Tolerance Analysis Method Based on Skin Model Shapes of Planar Parts , 2016 .

[75]  Sandro Wartzack,et al.  Shaping the digital twin for design and production engineering , 2017 .

[76]  Jeffrey C. Trinkle,et al.  Interactive Simulation of Rigid Body Dynamics in Computer Graphics , 2014, Eurographics.

[77]  Giovanni Moroni,et al.  Geometric Inspection Planning as a Key Element in Industry 4.0 , 2018 .