The Effect of Personality on Collaborative Task Performance and Interaction

Collocated, multi-user technologies, which support group-work are becoming increasingly popular. Examples include MERL’s Diamondtouch and Microsoft’s Surface, both of which have evolved from research prototypes to commercial products. Many applications have been developed for such technologies which support the work and entertainment needs of small groups of people. None of these applications however, have been studied in terms of the interactions and performances of their users with regards to their personality. In this paper, we address this research gap by conducting a series of user studies involving dyads working on a number of multi-user applications on the DiamondTouch tabletop device.

[1]  P. Costa,et al.  Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO-Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) , 1992 .

[2]  R. W. Pickford,et al.  Psychology and Visual Aesthetics , 1973 .

[3]  Darren Leigh,et al.  DiamondTouch: a multi-user touch technology , 2001, UIST '01.

[4]  Marisa E. Campbell CHI 2004 , 2004, INTR.

[5]  Alan F. Smeaton,et al.  TRECVid 2006 Experiments at Dublin City University , 2012, TRECVID.

[6]  Alan F. Smeaton,et al.  TRECVID 2004 Experiments in Dublin City University , 2004, TRECVID.

[7]  Jeff Moad Psych tests for MIS staff: is this nuts? , 1994 .

[8]  Paul Over,et al.  Evaluation campaigns and TRECVid , 2006, MIR '06.

[9]  Richard E. Potter,et al.  Expertise, extraversion and group interaction styles as performance indicators in virtual teams: how do perceptions of IT's performance get formed? , 2004, DATB.

[10]  Arvid Karsvall,et al.  Personality preferences in graphical interface design , 2002, NordiCHI '02.

[11]  D. Byrne,et al.  ATTRACTION AS A LINEAR FUNCTION OF PROPORTION OF POSITIVE REINFORCEMENTS. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  R. R. Abidin Psychological Assessment Resources , 1995 .

[13]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  DiamondSpin: an extensible toolkit for around-the-table interaction , 2004, CHI.

[14]  Narasimhaiah Gorla,et al.  Who should work with whom?: building effective software project teams , 2004, CACM.

[15]  Dan Cosley,et al.  Think different: increasing online community participation using uniqueness and group dissimilarity , 2004, CHI.

[16]  Rebecca H. Rutherfoord Using personality inventories to form teams for class projects: a case study , 2006, SIGITE '06.