Enhancing information scent: identifying and recommending quality tags

We describe a scenario of tag use and an empirical study of tags as socio-cognitive artifacts providing information scent. We articulated a three-step use scenario of tags, and used it to conceptualize tag "quality" as determined by use. We designed and conducted a user study to explore what attributes of tags and taggers predict the user-rated "quality" of tags. We found that frequency best predicted tag quality, while information entropy provided further refinement. We found that people rated our identified quality tags as higher in quality than general tags. But these identified quality tags were not perceived as better than self-generated tags. We derived a regression model for tag quality and discussed implications for social computing.

[1]  Michael J. Muller Comparing tagging vocabularies among four enterprise tag-based services , 2007, GROUP.

[2]  Allan Collins,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .

[3]  John Riedl,et al.  tagging, communities, vocabulary, evolution , 2006, CSCW '06.

[4]  Melanie Tory,et al.  Evaluating Visualizations: Do Expert Reviews Work? , 2005, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[5]  Stuart K. Card,et al.  Information foraging in information access environments , 1995, CHI '95.

[6]  Kerry Rodden,et al.  How do people manage their digital photographs? , 2003, CHI '03.

[7]  Vannevar Bush,et al.  As we may think , 1945, INTR.

[8]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Making use: a design representation , 1994, CACM.

[9]  M. Roseman,et al.  A usability study of awareness widgets in a shared workspace groupware system , 1996, CSCW '96.

[10]  N. J. Slamecka,et al.  The Generation Effect: Delineation of a Phenomenon , 1978 .

[11]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  Understanding Navigability of Social Tagging Systems , 2006 .

[12]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  Understanding the efficiency of social tagging systems using information theory , 2008, ICWSM.

[13]  Mor Naaman,et al.  Why do tagging systems work? , 2006, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[14]  Yang Song,et al.  Evaluating tagging behavior in social bookmarking systems: metrics and design heuristics , 2007, GROUP.

[15]  Vittorio Loreto,et al.  Vocabulary growth in collaborative tagging systems , 2007, ArXiv.

[16]  Gary Klein,et al.  Naturalistic Decision Making , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[17]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  The vocabulary problem in human-system communication , 1987, CACM.

[18]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces , 1992, CSCW '92.

[19]  T. Rickards Sense making in organizations , 1997 .

[20]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[21]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Why CSCW Applications Fail: Problems in the Design and Evaluation of Organization of Organizational Interfaces. , 1988 .

[22]  Peter Pirolli,et al.  Information Foraging , 2009, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[23]  S. Lundgren Exploring the Interplay Between Emotions and Interaction , 2009, Nordes 2009: Engaging Artifacts.

[24]  P. Berger,et al.  The Social Construction of Reality , 1966 .

[25]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Cognitive artifacts , 1991 .

[26]  Robert W. Proctor,et al.  Metacognitive Processes in Human-Computer Interaction: Self-Assessments of Knowledge as Predictors of Computer Expertise , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[27]  Stuart K. Card,et al.  The cost structure of sensemaking , 1993, INTERCHI.

[28]  Wai-Tat Fu The microstructures of social tagging: a rational model , 2008, CSCW.

[29]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Why CSCW applications fail: problems in the design and evaluationof organizational interfaces , 1988, CSCW '88.

[30]  Valentin Robu,et al.  The complex dynamics of collaborative tagging , 2007, WWW '07.

[31]  George Macgregor,et al.  Collaborative tagging as a knowledge organisation and resource discovery tool , 2006 .

[32]  Mark S. Ackerman,et al.  Expertise recommender: a flexible recommendation system and architecture , 2000, CSCW '00.

[33]  Vittorio Loreto,et al.  Collaborative Tagging and Semiotic Dynamics , 2006, ArXiv.

[34]  John Riedl,et al.  The quest for quality tags , 2007, GROUP.

[35]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems , 2006, J. Inf. Sci..