Single Image Plankton 3D Reconstruction from Extended Depth of Field Shadowgraph

Marine plankton occurs in the ocean with strongly varying degrees of sparsity. For in-situ plankton measurements the shadowgraph has been established as the observation device of choice in recent years. In this paper a novel depth from defocus based approach to partially coherent 3D reconstruction of marine plankton volumes is presented. With a combination of recent advances in coherent image restoration and deep learning, we create a 3D view of the shadowgraph observation volume. For the selection of in-focus images we develop a novel training data generation technique. This kind of reconstruction was previously only possible with holographic imaging systems, which require laser illumination with high coherence, which often causes parasitic interferences on optical components and speckles. The new 3D visualization gives easily manageable data by resulting in a sharp view of each plankton together with its depth and position. Moreover, this approach allows the creation of all-in-focus images of larger observation volumes, which is otherwise impossible due to the physically limited depth of field. We show an effective increase in depth of field by a factor of 7, which allows marine researchers to use larger observation volumes and thus a much more effective observation of marine plankton.

[1]  Frédo Durand,et al.  Understanding and evaluating blind deconvolution algorithms , 2009, CVPR.

[2]  N. Otsu A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[3]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[4]  G. Settles Schlieren and shadowgraph techniques , 2001 .

[5]  R. Cowen,et al.  In situ ichthyoplankton imaging system (ISIIS): system design and preliminary results , 2008 .

[6]  Adam T. Greer,et al.  Evaluation of the In Situ Ichthyoplankton Imaging System (ISIIS): comparison with the traditional (bongo net) sampler , 2013 .

[7]  Jian Sheng,et al.  Microalga propels along vorticity direction in a shear flow. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[8]  Roger Harris,et al.  ICES zooplankton methodology manual , 2000 .

[9]  L. Repetto,et al.  Lensless digital holographic microscope with light-emitting diode illumination. , 2004, Optics letters.

[10]  Dumitru Erhan,et al.  Going deeper with convolutions , 2014, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[11]  Phil F. Culverhouse,et al.  Comparison of a Cost-Effective Integrated Plankton Sampling and Imaging Instrument with Traditional Systems for Mesozooplankton Sampling in the Celtic Sea , 2018, Front. Mar. Sci..

[12]  J. Katz,et al.  Applications of Holography in Fluid Mechanics and Particle Dynamics , 2010 .

[13]  Amrita Mazumdar Principles and Techniques of Schlieren Imaging Systems , 2013 .

[14]  Jian Sun,et al.  Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[15]  J. Garcia-Sucerquia,et al.  Digital in-line holographic microscopy with partially coherent light: micrometer resolution , 2010 .

[16]  Peter H. Wiebe,et al.  Zooplankton Methodology Manual , 2000 .

[17]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge , 2014, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[18]  Rob Fergus,et al.  Depth Map Prediction from a Single Image using a Multi-Scale Deep Network , 2014, NIPS.

[19]  Reinhard Koch,et al.  Improved wavefront correction for coherent image restoration. , 2017, Optics express.